Biomedical subjects

Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle

Publications and source records attributed to Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Poor knowledge of basic cancer facts of physicians-in-training.

PURPOSE: Since many physicians-in-training will play an important role in cancer screening, their understanding of cancer screening and basic cancer facts is paramount. This investigation was undertaken to determine their baseline knowledge in basic cancer facts. METHOD: A questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge of basic cancer facts of medical students, medical residents and surgical residents. Participants were asked to rank five different malignancies in their correct order for both mortality and incidence. Physicians-in-training were given separate questions for male and female patients. The questions were considered correct if at least the first three malignancies were ranked in the appropriate order. RESULTS: One-hundred-twelve second-year medical students and 78 residents were assessed. Few physicians-in-training ranked the malignancies in correct order for mortality (21% for female patients and 18% for male patients). Even fewer physicians-in-training ranked the malignancies in correct order for incidence (2% for female patients and 9% for male patients). CONCLUSION: Most physicians-in-training lack an understanding of basic cancer facts. If this poor basic cancer fact knowledge represents an overall lack of cancer knowledge, educational efforts need to be focused on cancer care for all levels and specialties of physician training.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Synchronous occurrence of glioblastoma multiforme and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Synchronous malignancies are rare occurrences for which there may be a genetic link between two cancers or which may be simply coincidental. Although glioblastoma multiforme and esophageal adenocarcinoma have few clinical similarities there are no known biochemical or genetic links between the two malignancies. This case discussion details the synchronous occurrences of these two lesions and highlights possible clinical, biochemical, and genetic commonalities.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2002

How early is early laparoscopic treatment of acute cholecystitis?

BACKGROUND: Despite the well-accepted success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elective treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis, the efficacy and timing of this technique has been subject to some debate in the setting of acute cholecystitis. This study was undertaken to evaluate our institution's experience with early cholecystectomy as a safe, effective treatment of acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Charts of all patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the length of time from onset of symptoms to surgical intervention: less than 48 hours in the early group (n = 14) and more than 48 hours in the late group (n = 31). RESULTS: Comparing the two groups, the conversion rate to an open procedure was significantly less (0 versus 29%, P <0.04) in the early treated patients. Furthermore, the operative time (73 versus 96 minutes, P <0.004), postoperative hospitalization (1.2 versus 3.9 days, P <0.001), and total hospital stay (2.1 versus 5.4 days, P <0.004) were significantly reduced in patients undergoing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by experienced surgeons is a safe, effective technique for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Patients treated within 48 hours of onset of symptoms experience a lower conversion rate to an open procedure, shorter operative time and reduced hospitalization.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2002

Education of medical students in clinical breast examination during surgical clerkship.

BACKGROUND: Medical student training in clinical breast examination is deficient at most medical schools. The use of silicone breast models may allow the education of abnormal and normal findings. This study examines the efficacy of silicone breast models to educate medical students in clinical breast examinations during their third-year surgical rotation. METHODS: Medical students were randomly selected to participate in formalized training sessions in clinical breast examination or as a control group. Presession and postsession testing with silicone breast models were performed. True positives (masses that were present and documented by the student) and false positives (masses that were not present but were documented by the student) were recorded. RESULTS: Medical students undergoing the training sessions demonstrated improved true positive scores (2.2 to 2.8; P <0.05) as well as improved false positive scores (3.0 to 2.0; P = 0.30) and total scores (-0.8 to 0.8; P = 0.07). Students who documented an increase in the number of breast examinations during their rotations had statistically lower false positive scores. CONCLUSIONS: Students after formalized clinical breast examination sessions do improve their ability to detect breast masses, although they continue to detect masses that are not present. Experience of actual breast examinations during their surgical rotations may refine their clinical skills.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Physicians-in-training recommendations for prophylactic bilateral mastectomies.

The decision to recommend bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (PBM), one treatment modality used to reduce the development of breast carcinoma, may be influenced by physician bias. This investigation tested the hypothesis that there are physician-in-training biases in recommendations of PBM. All second-year medical students, general surgical residents, and internal medicine residents at our institution participated in a survey in which they were asked at what percent risk of developing breast carcinoma the physicians-in-training would recommend PBM for 1) their patients, 2) themselves, and 3) their significant others, as applicable. A total of 198 physicians-in-training responded. Univariate analysis demonstrated an association between both the type of physician-in-training (p<0.03) and gender (p<0.004) with the percent risk for which respondents would recommend PBM. However, with multivariate analysis, only gender was associated with percent risk (p<0.05). Physicians-in-training also chose PBM at a lower risk for their significant others than for themselves (67.5% versus 57.2%; p<0.02). Respondents also chose PBM at a similar risk for themselves or significant others as for their patients (r=0.83, r=0.98; p<0.001). This investigation suggests that males (compared to females) are more likely to recommend PBM for the prevention of breast cancer.

Adult↗