PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Shandra S Wilson

Publications and source records attributed to Shandra S Wilson.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Baseline factors as predictors of clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men treated with placebo.

PURPOSE: We analyzed data from the placebo arm of the MTOPS trial to determine clinical predictors of BPH progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3,047 patients with LUTS were randomized to either placebo, doxazosin (4 to 8 mg), finasteride (5 mg), or a combination of doxazosin and finasteride. Average length of followup was 4.5 years. The primary outcome was time to overall clinical progression of BPH, defined as either a confirmed 4-point or greater increase in AUA SS, acute urinary retention, incontinence, renal insufficiency, or recurrent urinary tract infection. We analyzed BPH progression event data from the 737 men who were randomized to placebo. RESULTS: The rate of overall clinical progression of BPH events in the placebo group was 4.5 per 100 person-years, for a cumulative incidence (among men who had at least 4 years of followup data) of 17%. The risk of BPH progression was significantly greater in patients on placebo with a baseline TPV of 31 ml or greater vs less than 31 ml (p <0.0001), a baseline PSA of 1.6 ng/dl or greater vs PSA less than 1.6 ng/dl (p = 0.0009), a baseline Qmax of less than 10.6 ml per second vs 10.6 ml per second or greater (p = 0.011), a baseline PVR of 39 ml or greater vs less than 39 ml (p = 0.0008) and baseline age 62 years or older vs younger than 62 years (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Among men in the placebo arm, baseline TPV, PSA, Qmax, PVR and age were important predictors of the risk of clinical progression of BPH.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗

Controversies of androgen ablation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer.

Ever since Huggins and Hodges won a Nobel Prize in 1966 for their work describing the relationship between testosterone and prostate cancer, androgen deprivation has continued to be an important component in the treatment of prostate cancer. Refinements in the therapy have occurred in the past 50 years, yet controversies still exist. This review details the controversies and advances in androgen deprivation for prostate cancer including: neoadjuvant androgen deprivation, combined androgen blockade, early versus late androgen deprivation treatment, intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation monotherapy, anti-androgen monotherapy, anti-androgen and 5-alpha reductase inhibitor combinations, androgen deprivation with periodic intravenous bisphosphonate infusions, and androgen deprivation in conjunction with chemotherapy.

Androgen Antagonists↗

Prostate cancer screening.

Prostate cancer is the leading noncutaneous cancer in men of the Western world. Because of its prevalence and ability to cause morbidity and mortality,prostate cancer screening continues to be an important area of focus in health care. This article covers the sensitivity and specificity of prostate-specific antigen and current techniques used to improve the test's validity, the importance of detecting clinically important cancers with screening, as well as the downward stage migration, decreased disease-specific mortality, and decreased metastases rate seen inpatients screened and treated for prostate cancer.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Clinical staging of prostate cancer: a computer-simulated study of transperineal prostate biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the precise location of prostate cancer within the gland and thus possibly permit more aggressive therapy of the lesion, while potentially sparing the noncancerous gland from ablative therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional "solid" computer models were reconstructed for 86 autopsy specimens and 20 stage T1c radical prostatectomy specimens. Transperineal biopsies were simulated for grid sizes of 5-mm (method A) and 10-mm (method B) with an 18 G, 23-mm long biopsy needle. One or two biopsies per grid point were obtained for a total of 12-108 biopsies, depending on the size of the prostate. Clinically threatening cancers were defined as having volumes of > or = 0.5 mL or Gleason sum > or = 7. RESULTS: Method A detected significantly more carcinomas than method B in both the autopsy and prostatectomy specimens (autopsy, 72 vs 51; prostatectomy, 50 vs 32, both P < 0.001). Method A also detected more clinically threatening cancers found at autopsy (38/40 vs 31/40, P = 0.008). Among autopsy patients with negative sextant biopsies whose disease was localized to one side, method A detected 72% and method B detected 29-43% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this computer simulation show that 5- and 10-mm grid biopsies detect three-quarters and a third, respectively, at autopsy, of patients with the disease localized to one side of the prostate, which may be useful when planning highly selective ablative treatments in the future.

Adult↗

Screening for prostate cancer: current recommendations.

Recent studies have questioned the efficacy of PSA as a marker for the early detection of prostate cancer, but techniques are being investigated to improve the sensitivity and specificity of screening. It is hoped that new methods can differentiate between lethal and nonlethal cancers, thereby avoiding lead-time bias. Even with the current limitations of PSA, the combination of stage migration seen with screening, the recent Scandinavian study showing decrease of disease progression following surgical extirpation, and the known mortality in patients presenting with advanced disease help support PSA screening for prostate cancer. It is hoped that prospective, randomized, long-term screening studies, such as the PLCO and ERSCP trials, will show improved survival using the admittedly imperfect PSA marker in prostate cancer screening.

Aged↗

Screening for prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is a highly prevalent disease in the Western world. In the United States alone, prostate cancer affects approximately 230,000 men and causes the death of 30,000 American men annually. Several theoretical health care measures may be implemented to decrease the morbidity and mortality of any disease. These measures include prevention, screening, improved curative treatment, and the transformation of an acute lethal disease to a chronic, tolerable one. This summary focuses on the screening aspects of prostate cancer.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗