PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sharon K Shipley

Publications and source records attributed to Sharon K Shipley.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading.

OBJECTIVE: Variations in pregnancy rates (PR) between IVF programs are due to multiple factors, including embryo quality. Standardized embryo grading systems have been developed to improve communication between embryologists and clinicians. However, these grading systems have not been validated. We sought to quantify both interobserver and intraobserver variability using a standardized day 3 embryo grading system (Veeck scale). DESIGN: Prospective, sample-randomized, controlled, blinded study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Twenty-six practicing embryologists. INTERVENTION(S): Observation and grading of 35 video clips of day 3 embryos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Interobserver and intraobserver variability. Embryologists were also assessed by education level, years of experience, size of IVF program, and type of grading system used. Kappa scores and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULT(S): Practicing embryologists differed from control (Lucinda Veeck) by as much as two grades, despite using the same grading system (Kappa = 0.24, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.98). There was also variability in grading the same embryo (Kappa = 0.69, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.88). Programs with higher cycle numbers per year had lower variability. CONCLUSION(S): There is substantial interobserver variability and moderate intraobserver variability among embryologists. Such variability could alter both the expected quality of embryos transferred, as well as the number transferred, both of which directly impact IVF program success.

Embryo Transfer↗

Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate viability and implantation potential of cryopreserved blastocysts according to the day of blastocyst expansion and cryopreservation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Private ART center. PATIENT(S): Three hundred and seventy-five patients undergoing embryo transfer with cryopreserved blastocysts. INTERVENTION(S): Blastocyst cryopreservation on day 5, 6, or 7 after oocyte retrieval according to the day of blastocyst expansion and subsequent embryo transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate (PR) per embryo transfer. RESULT(S): Clinical PRs were similar between blastocysts cryopreserved on day 5 and blastocysts cryopreserved on day 6 (32% vs. 28%). The clinical PR was lower for blastocysts cryopreserved on day 7 (15%), but this difference was not statistically significant after accounting for the number of embryos per transfer (P=.15). CONCLUSION(S): Viability and implantation potential are similar for day 5 and day 6 blastocyst cryopreservation. Viability may be reduced for blastocysts cryopreserved on day 7, but not to the extent suggested by reports of fresh transfers. These results suggest that reduced success rates associated with fresh transfers of later developing blastocysts may be the result of asynchrony with endometrial receptivity instead of poorer embryo quality.

Adult↗