PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sharon Straus

Publications and source records attributed to Sharon Straus.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Decision analysis in aerospace medicine: costs and benefits of a hyperbaric facility in space.

INTRODUCTION: Assembly and maintenance of the International Space Station (ISS) requires an unprecedented number of spacewalks, which expose astronauts to the risk of decompression sickness (DCS). We illustrate the use of decision analysis to compare a hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) chamber to currently available therapy for DCS treatment on the ISS. METHODS: A decision-analytic model that simulates events over the lifespan of the ISS was constructed. Inputs to the model for probabilities, costs, and measures of morbidity and mortality were derived from a variety of sources, including a systematic literature review and an iterative consultation process with personnel at the Canadian Space Agency and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The decision model was analyzed using the methods of Monte-Carlo simulation and expected value calculation. Main outcome measures included the present value of costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and the cumulative probability of mission-related events over the life cycle of the ISS. Sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: The HBO chamber strategy is associated with a mean cost of -12.5 million dollarsw (a net cost saving of 12.5 million dollars) with a 95% CI (-112.8 million dollars, 51.3 million dollars). An HBO chamber reduces the likelihood of a premature shuttle return and a premature Soyuz return by 8% and 3%, respectively. The result is sensitive to the lifespan of the ISS. CONCLUSIONS: At a 50 million dollars cost, an HBO chamber is likely, though not certain, to result in cost savings. Decision analysis is a useful tool for use in priority setting in aerospace medicine.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed2005

Analysis of treatment practices for elderly cancer patients in Ontario, Canada.

PURPOSE: Older patients are underrepresented in many areas of cancer services utilization and in clinical trial enrollment. This study evaluates whether age, when adjusted for sex, comorbidity, stage, tumor site, geography, and time period, is predictive of cancer treatment practice. METHODS: First, we used the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR) to examine for any apparent differences in treatment practices between elderly (> or = 70 years) and younger patients in the last three decades. Second, we performed a chart review of 1,505 patients with lung, breast, and colorectal cancers seen in Ontario either at an urban center, the Princess Margaret Hospital, or at a rural center, the Northwestern Regional Cancer Centre. Patients were randomly selected from two time periods, 1977 to 1978 and 1997; and the study population was to comprise at least 50% elderly patients. RESULTS: OCR data demonstrated that, in some settings, such as colorectal cancer, the proportions of elderly cancer patients who were referred to cancer centers and who received any cancer treatment were lower than their younger counterparts. The chart review data showed that increasing age was a significant negative predictor for receiving any cancer treatment (P < .001, multivariate analysis) and for having a clinical trial discussion with the treating specialist (P < .001, multivariate analysis). CONCLUSION: Independent of other factors, older age is consistently a cause of disparity in cancer treatment practice and in clinical trial discussion with patients. By increasing the accrual rate of elderly cancer patients in clinical trials, a better understanding of appropriate therapies for this patient population can be obtained and may, thereby, impact on their cancer-related morbidity and mortality.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2003

A case of 'circling seizures' and an intratumoral abscess.

We describe a case of a 38-year-old woman who presented with 'circling' seizures and was found to have an intracranial mass with features consistent with a meningioma. Three weeks prior to her presentation she underwent an uncomplicated vaginal hysterectomy. However, after discharge to home she developed a 4-day history of fever, chills and night sweats that eventually resolved. She underwent surgical removal of her intracranial mass without difficulty but intra-operative pathology showed features of acute cerebritis at the margins of the tumor. Further sectioning of the mass revealed evidence of an intratumoral abscess. Culture of the meningioma revealed heavy growth of Bacteroides fragilis. The patient was treated with intravenous antibiotics, discharged home in excellent health and has had no recurrence of seizures. In our case report we will review the historical literature on the incidence and features of intratumoral abscess. Although it is considered a rare event, our case demonstrates both common and unique features about this occurrence and highlights an unusual chain of events in the natural history of the patient's meningioma and the way in which it became clinically apparent.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Management of patients with hypertensive urgencies and emergencies: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive urgencies and emergencies are common clinical occurrences in hypertensive patients. Treatment practices vary considerably to because of the lack of evidence supporting the use of one therapeutic agent over another. This paper was designed to review the evidence for various pharmacotherapeutic regimens in the management of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies, in terms of the agents' abilities to reach predetermined "safe" goal blood pressures (BPs), and to prevent adverse events. METHODS: medline was searched from 1966 to 2001, and the reference lists of all the articles were retrieved and searched for relevant references, and experts in the field were contacted to identify other relevant studies. The Cochrane Library was also searched. Studies that were eligible for inclusion in this review were systematic reviews of randomized control trials (RCTs) and individual RCTs, all-or-none studies, systematic reviews of cohort studies and individual cohort studies, and outcomes research. No language restrictions were used. RESULTS: None of the trials included in this review identified an optimal rate of BP lowering in hypertensive emergencies and urgencies. The definitions of hypertensive emergencies and urgencies were not consistent, but emergencies always involved target end-organ damage, and urgencies were without such damage. Measures of outcome were not uniform between studies. The 4 hypertensive emergency and 15 hypertensive urgency studies represented 236 and 1,074 patients, respectively. The evidence indicated a nonsignificant trend toward increased efficacy with urapidil compared to nitroprusside for hypertensive emergencies (number needed to treat [NNT] for urapidil to achieve target BP, 12; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], number of patients needed to harm [NNH], 5 to NNT, 40 compared to nitroprusside). Several medications were efficacious in treating hypertensive urgencies, including: nicardipine (NNT for nicardipine compared to plabebo, 2 in one study [95% CI, 1 to 5] and 1 in another [95% CI, 1 to 1]); lacidipine (NNT, 2; 95% CI, 1 to 8 for lacidipine vs nifedipine) or urapidil (NNT for urapidil compared to enalaprilat and nifedipine, 4; 95% CI, 3 to 6); and nitroprusside and fenoldopam (all patients reached target BP in 2 studies). The studies reported 2 cases of cerebral ischemia secondary to nifedipine. CONCLUSIONS: Many effective agents exist for the treatment of hypertensive crises. Because of the lack of large randomized controlled trials, many questions remain unanswered, such as follow-up times and whether any of the studied agents have mortality benefit.

Antihypertensive Agents↗