PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Shea Polancich

Publications and source records attributed to Shea Polancich.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Birth certificate methods in five hospitals.

This study evaluated the methods of data collection of birth certificate information by five high-delivery hospitals in northern Texas. Research purposes were to identify sources and methods of birth certificate data collection and identify the most-reliable methods. This descriptive study involved interviews of each hospital's data collectors and review of 1999 Texas birth certificate data. Medical record clerks, whose training varied, but usually consisted of orientation by another medical record clerk, collected birth certificate data within 24 hours of birth. There was no standard method for training, nor was there a minimum level of education required. In four of the five hospitals studied, a birth certificate clerk collected most of the information with limited input from other medical sources. The information obtained on birth certificates therefore varied according to the collector and the priority placed upon the accuracy of information. Birth certificate data contain questionable reliability, which undermines data use in research, funding, and policy decisions.

Bias↗

Cautious use of administrative data for decubitus ulcer outcome reporting.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that caution should be exercised when using administrative data, exclusively, to report quality and safety outcomes. Investigators identified hospital-acquired decubitus ulcers using Agency for Health-care Research and Quality (AHRQ) patient safety indicator definitions. As validation of this method, investigators abstracted 123 medical charts of patients identified through AHRQ methodology as having hospital-acquired decubitus ulcers. Abstraction of these cases produced a change in rate from 23.3 decubitus ulcers per 1000 patients, derived through administrative data, to a true rate of 7.9 decubitus ulcers per 1000 patients, a 66% reduction. Investigators found 2 additional flaws (1 internal and 1 methodological) that further decreased the decubitus ulcer rate to 6.14 per 1000, a 74% variance. The results of this study suggest that administrative data, when used alone, are not sufficient in measuring the true rate of hospital-acquired decubitus ulcers.

Cross Infection↗