PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Shigeyuki Kuwada

Publications and source records attributed to Shigeyuki Kuwada.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Transformations in processing interaural time differences between the superior olivary complex and inferior colliculus: beyond the Jeffress model.

Interaural time differences (ITDs) are used to localize sounds and improve signal detection in noise. Encoding ITDs in neurons depends on specialized mechanisms for comparing inputs from the two ears. Most studies have emphasized how the responses of ITD-sensitive neurons are consistent with the tenets of the Jeffress model. The Jeffress model uses neuronal coincidence detectors that compare inputs from both sides and delay lines so that different neurons achieve coincidence at different ITDs. Although Jeffress-type models are successful at predicting sensitivity to ITDs in humans, in many respects they are a limited representation of the responses seen in neurons. In the superior olivary complex (SOC), ITD-sensitive neurons are distributed across both the medial (MSO) and lateral (LSO) superior olives. Similar response types are found in neurons sensitive to ITDs in two signal types: low-frequency sounds and envelopes of high-frequency sounds. Excitatory-excitatory interactions in the MSO are associated with peak-type responses, and excitatory-inhibitory interactions in the LSO are associated with trough-type responses. There are also neurons with responses intermediate between peak- and trough-type. In the inferior colliculus (IC), the same basic types remain, presumably due to inputs arising from the MSO and LSO. Using recordings from the SOC and IC, we describe how the response types can be described within a continuum that extends to very large values of ITD, and compare the functional organization at the two levels.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response.

The scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR) is gaining recognition as an objective audiometric tool, but little is known about the neural sources that underlie this potential. We hypothesized, based on our human studies and single-unit recordings in animals, that the scalp-recorded AMFR reflects the interaction of multiple sources. We tested this hypothesis using an animal model, the unanesthetized rabbit. We compared AMFRs recorded from the surface of the brain at different locations and before and after the administration of agents likely to enhance or suppress neural generators. We also recorded AMFRs locally at several stations along the auditory neuraxis. We conclude that the surface-recorded AMFR is indeed a composite response from multiple brain generators. Although the response at any modulation frequency can reflect the activity of more than one generator, the AMFRs to low and high modulation frequencies appear to reflect a strong contribution from cortical and subcortical sources, respectively.

Acoustic Stimulation↗