PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Shin Onizuka

Publications and source records attributed to Shin Onizuka.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration is not the only cause of lidocaine-induced cell damage in the cultured neurons of Lymnaea stagnalis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration induced by lidocaine produces neurotoxicity, we compared morphological changes and Ca2+ concentrations, using fura-2 imaging, in the cultured neurons of Lymnaea stagnalis. METHODS: We used BAPTA-AM, a Ca2+ chelator, to prevent the increase in the intracellular Ca2+ concentration, and Calcimycin A23187, a Ca2+ ionophore, to identify the relationship between increased intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations and neuronal damage without lidocaine. Morphological changes were confirmed using trypan blue to stain the cells. RESULTS: Increasing the dose of lidocaine increased the intracellular Ca2+ concentration; however, there was no morphological damage to the cells in lidocaine at 3 x 10(-3) M. Lidocaine at 3 x 10(-2) M increased the intracellular Ca2+ concentration in both saline (from 238 +/- 63 to 1038 +/- 156 nM) and Ca2+-free medium (from 211 +/- 97 to 1046 +/- 169 nM) and produced morphological damage and shrinkage, with the formation of a rugged surface. With the addition of BAPTA-AM, lidocaine at 3 x 10(-2) M moderately increased the intracellular Ca2+ concentration (from 150 +/- 97 to 428 +/- 246 nM) and produced morphological damage. These morphologically changed cells were stained dark blue with trypan blue dye. The Ca2+ ionophore increased the intracellular Ca2+ concentration (from 277 +/- 191 to 1323 +/- 67 nM) and decreased it to 186 +/- 109 nM at 60 min. Morphological damage was not observed during the 60 min, but became apparent a few hours later. CONCLUSION: These results indicated that the increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration is not the only cause of lidocaine-induced cell damage.

Anesthetics, Local↗

Long-term exposure to local but not inhalation anesthetics affects neurite regeneration and synapse formation between identified lymnaea neurons.

BACKGROUND: General and local anesthetics are used in various combinations during surgical procedures to repair damaged tissues and organs, which in almost all instances involve nervous system functions. Because synaptic transmission recovers rapidly from various inhalation anesthetics, it is generally assumed that their effects on nerve regeneration and synapse formation that precede injury or surgery may not be as detrimental as that of their local counterparts. However, a direct comparison of most commonly used inhalation (sevoflurane, isoflurane) and local anesthetics (lidocaine, bupivacaine), vis-a-vis their effects on synapse transmission, neurite regeneration, and synapse formation has not yet been performed. METHODS: In this study, using cell culture, electrophysiologic and imaging techniques on unequivocally identified presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons from the mollusc Lymnaea, the authors provided a comparative account of the effects of both general and local anesthetics on synaptic transmission, nerve regeneration, and synapse formation between cultured neurons. RESULTS: The data show that clinically used concentrations of both inhalation and local anesthetics affect synaptic transmission in a concentration-dependent and reversal manner. The authors provided the first direct evidence that long-term overnight treatment of cultured neurons with sevoflurane and isoflurane does not affect neurite regeneration, whereas both lidocaine and bupivacaine suppress neurite outgrowth completely. The soma-soma synapse model was then used to compare the effects of both types of agents on synapse formation. The authors found that local but not inhalation anesthetics drastically reduced the incidence of synapse formation. The local anesthetic-induced prevention of synapse formation most likely involved the failure of presynaptic machinery, which otherwise developed normally in the presence of both sevoflurane and isoflurane. CONCLUSION: This study thus provides the first comparative, albeit preclinical, account of the effects of both general and local anesthetics on synaptic transmission, nerve regeneration, and synapse formation and demonstrates that clinically used lidocaine and bupivacaine have drastic long-term effects on neurite regeneration and synapse formation as compared with sevoflurane and isoflurane.

Action Potentials↗

Sevoflurane blocks cholinergic synaptic transmission postsynaptically but does not affect short-term potentiation.

BACKGROUND: As compared with their effects on both inhibitory and excitatory synapses, little is known about the mechanisms by which general anesthetics affect synaptic plasticity that forms the basis for learning and memory at the cellular level. To test whether clinically relevant concentrations of sevoflurane affect short-term potentiation involving cholinergic synaptic transmission, the soma-soma synapses between identified, postsynaptic neurons were used. METHODS: Uniquely identifiable neurons visceral dorsal 4 (presynaptic) and left pedal dorsal 1 (postsynaptic) of the mollusk Lymnaea stagnalis were isolated from the intact ganglion and paired overnight in a soma-soma configuration. Simultaneous intracellular recordings coupled with fluorescent imaging of the FM1-43 dye were made in either the absence or the presence of sevoflurane. RESULTS: Cholinergic synapses, similar to those observed in vivo, developed between the neurons, and the synaptic transmission exhibited classic short-term, posttetanic potentiation. Action potential-induced (visceral dorsal 4), 1:1 excitatory postsynaptic potentials were reversibly and significantly suppressed by sevoflurane in a concentration-dependent manner. Fluorescent imaging with the dye FM1-43 revealed that sevoflurane did not affect presynaptic exocytosis or endocytosis; instead, postsynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors were blocked in a concentration-dependent manner. To test the hypothesis that sevoflurane affects short-term potentiation, a posttetanic potentiation paradigm was used, and synaptic transmission was examined in either the presence or the absence of sevoflurane. Although 1.5% sevoflurane significantly reduced synaptic transmission between the paired cells, it did not affect the formation or retention of posttetanic potentiation at this synapse. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that sevoflurane blocks cholinergic synaptic transmission postsynaptically but does not affect short-term synaptic plasticity at the visceral dorsal 4-left pedal dorsal 1 synapse.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗

Lidocaine excites both pre- and postsynaptic neurons of reconstructed respiratory pattern generator in Lymnaea stagnalis.

Lidocaine causes both inhibition and excitation in the central nervous system, including the respiratory pattern. The excitation induced by an excessive dose of local anesthetic is thought to be the result of an initial blockade of an inhibitory pathway in the cerebral cortex. To clarify the effect of lidocaine on the pre- and postsynaptic neurons of an inhibitory synapse, a cultured soma-soma respiratory pattern generator model consisting of two neurons from the snail Lymnaea stagnalis were reconstructed in vitro. First we investigated the effects of lidocaine on single presynaptic (RPeD1) or postsynaptic (VD4) neurons. While RPeD1 and VD4 were simultaneously recorded, the number of action potentials, the membrane potential, and the wavelength of the action potential were compared before and after lidocaine (0.01, 0.1, and 1 mM) administration. Lidocaine increased the number of action potentials and the wavelength of a single action potential, and it depolarized the resting membrane potential in both RPeD1 and VD4 neurons in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, lidocaine decreased outward potassium currents. In soma-soma pairs, RPeD1 excitation and VD4 suppression occurred in 0.01 mM lidocaine, whereas both RPeD1 and VD4 neurons were excited by 0.1 and 1 mM lidocaine. In conclusion, lidocaine causes a reduction in synaptic transmission and general neuronal excitation in both presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons.

Action Potentials↗

Lidocaine increases intracellular sodium concentration through voltage-dependent sodium channels in an identified lymnaea neuron.

BACKGROUND: The local anesthetic lidocaine affects neuronal excitability in the central nervous system; however, the mechanisms of such action remain unclear. The intracellular sodium concentration ([Na]i) and sodium currents (INa) are related to membrane potential and excitability. Using an identifiable respiratory pacemaker neuron from Lymnaea stagnalis, the authors sought to determine whether lidocaine changes [Na]i and membrane potential and whether INa is related to these changes. METHODS: Intracellular recording and sodium imaging were used simultaneously to measure membrane potentials and [Na]i, respectively. Measurements for [Na]i were made in normal, high-Na, and Na-free salines, with membrane hyperpolarization, and with tetrodotoxin pretreatment trials. Furthermore, changes of INa were measured by whole cell patch clamp configuration. RESULTS: Lidocaine increased [Na]i in a dose-dependent manner concurrent with a depolarization of the membrane potential. In the presence of high-Na saline, [Na]i increased and the membrane potential was depolarized; the addition of lidocaine further increased [Na]i, and the membrane potential was further depolarized. In Na-free saline or in the presence of tetrodotoxin, lidocaine did not change [Na]i. Similarly, hyperpolarization of the membrane by current injections also prevented the lidocaine-induced increase of [Na]i. In the patch clamp configuration, membrane depolarization by lidocaine led to an inward sodium influx. A persistent reduction in membrane potential, resulting from lidocaine, brings the cell within the window current of INa where sodium channel activation occurs. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine increases intracellular sodium concentration and promotes excitation through voltage-dependent sodium channels by altering membrane potential in the respiratory pacemaker neuron.

Anesthetics, Local↗

Procaine and mepivacaine have less toxicity in vitro than other clinically used local anesthetics.

UNLABELLED: The neurotoxicity of local anesthetics can be demonstrated in vitro by the collapse of growth cones and neurites in cultured neurons. We compared the neurotoxicity of procaine, mepivacaine, ropivacaine, bupivacaine, lidocaine, tetracaine, and dibucaine by using cultured neurons from the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis. A solution of local anesthetics was added to the culture dish to make final concentrations ranging from 1 x 10(-6) to 2 x 10(-2) M. Morphological changes in the growth cones and neurites were observed and graded 1 (moderate) or 2 (severe). The median concentrations yielding a score of 1 were 5 x 10(-4) M for procaine, 5 x 10(-4) M for mepivacaine, 2 x 10(-4) M for ropivacaine, 2 x 10(-4) M for bupivacaine, 1 x 10(-4) M for lidocaine, 5 x 10(-5) M for tetracaine, and 2 x 10(-5) M for dibucaine. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed between mepivacaine and ropivacaine, bupivacaine and lidocaine, lidocaine and tetracaine, and tetracaine and dibucaine. The order of neurotoxicity was procaine = mepivacaine < ropivacaine = bupivacaine < lidocaine < tetracaine < dibucaine. Although lidocaine is more toxic than bupivacaine and ropivacaine, mepivacaine, which has a similar pharmacological effect to lidocaine, has the least-adverse effects on cone growth among clinically used local anesthetics. IMPLICATIONS: Systematic comparison was assessed morphologically in growth cones and neurites exposed to seven local anesthetics. The order of neurotoxicity was procaine = mepivacaine < ropivacaine = bupivacaine < lidocaine < tetracaine < dibucaine. Although lidocaine is more toxic than bupivacaine and ropivacaine, mepivacaine, which has a similar pharmacological effect to lidocaine, is the safest among clinically used local anesthetics.

Anesthetics, Local↗