Hormone replacement therapy: the right choice for your patient?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
Biomedical subjects
Shou Ling Leong
Publications and source records attributed to Shou Ling Leong.
Integrating Web-based computer cases into a required clerkship: development and evaluation.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a five-year experience (1995-2000) developing and integrating computer cases into a required clerkship. METHOD: In Study 1, 54 volunteer students were randomly assigned to study articles, a paper case, or a computer case on low back pain/kidney stones. Students were given an exam immediately after the exercise and one week later. In Study 2, 325 clerkship students were asked to select and complete two computer cases or to prepare assignments on unrelated topics. Among the cases offered were two test cases on low back pain/kidney stones and pneumonia. Questions specific to the computer test cases (CC) and other noncomputer cases (NCC) were in the final exam. Exam scores related to CC questions and NCC questions were compared between the groups of students who did and did not complete the computer cases. Students also rated the computer cases on a questionnaire. RESULTS: In Study 1, reading articles required the most time and received the most negative comments. The students who completed the computer case scored the best on the exam one week later. In Study 2, the students who completed the two computer cases scored significantly higher on the CC questions than did students who studied only one or none of the computer cases (p <.001). There was no difference among groups for the NCC scores (p =.76). Students rated the computer cases with a mean of 6 on a seven-point scale (7 = strongly agree). CONCLUSION: Computer cases are effective learning tools, are well-received by students, and can be successfully integrated into existing clerkships.
Clinical Clerkship↗
Enhancing doctor-patient communication using email: a pilot study.
BACKGROUND: The doctor-patient relationship has been eroded by many factors. Would e-mail enhance communication and address some of the barriers inherent to our medical practices? METHODS: Of our study population, 4 physicians offered e-mail communication to participating patients and 4 did not. Both patients and physicians completed questionnaires regarding satisfaction, perceived quality, convenience, and promptness of the communication. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction significantly increased in the e-mail group compared with the control group in the areas of convenience (P < .0001) and the amount of time spent contacting their physician (P < .0001). Physician satisfaction in the e-mail group increased regarding convenience, amount of time spent on messages, and volume of messages. The response time was longer with e-mail. When asked if patients should be able to e-mail their physicians, most patients in the e-mail group and all but 2 of the physicians in the non-e-mail group responded "yes." CONCLUSION: E-mail communication was found to be a more convenient form of communication. Satisfaction by both patients and physicians improved in the e-mail group. The volume of messages and the time spent answering messages for the e-mail group physicians was not increased. E-mail has the potential to improve the doctor-patient relationship as a result of better communication.
Adult↗