Biomedical subjects

Sidney Delgado

Publications and source records attributed to Sidney Delgado.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The amelogenin story: origin and evolution.

Genome sequencing and gene mapping have permitted the identification of HEVIN (SPARC-Like1) as the probable ancestor of the enamel matrix proteins (EMPs), amelogenin (AMEL), ameloblastin (AMBN) and enamelin (ENAM). We have undertaken a phylogenetic analysis to elucidate their relationships. AMEL genes available in databases, and new sequences obtained in blast searching genomes or expressed sequence tags, were compiled (22 full-length sequences), aligned, and the ancestral sequence calculated and used to search for similarities using psi-blast. Hits were obtained with the N-terminal region of AMBN, ENAM, and HEVIN. We retrieved all available AMBN (n=8), ENAM (n=3), and HEVIN (n=4) sequences. The sequences of the four proteins were aligned and analyzed phylogenetically. AMEL and AMBN are sister genes, which diverged after duplication of a common ancestor issued from ENAM. The latter derived from a copy of HEVIN. Comparisons of gene organization, amino acid sequences and location of ENAM and AMBN, adjacent on the same chromosome, suggest that AMBN is closer to ENAM than AMEL. This supports AMEL as being derived from AMBN duplication. This duplication occurred long before tetrapod differentiation, probably in an ancestral osteichthyan. The story of AMEL origin is completed as follows: SPARC-->HEVIN-->ENAM-->AMBN-->AMEL.

Amelogenin↗

PubMed2005

Molecular evolution of amelogenin in mammals.

An evolutionary analysis of mammalian amelogenin, the major protein of forming enamel, was conducted by comparison of 26 sequences (including 14 new ones) representative of the main mammalian lineages. Amelogenin shows highly conserved residues in the hydrophilic N- and C-terminal regions. The central hydrophobic region (most of exon 6) is more variable, but it has conserved a high amount of proline and glutamine located in triplets, PXQ, indicating that these residues play an important role. This region evolves more rapidly, and is less constrained, than the other well-conserved regions, which are subjected to strong constraints. The comparison of the substitution rates in relation to the CpG richness confirmed that the highly conserved regions are subjected to strong selective pressures. The amino acids located at important sites and the residues known to lead to amelogenesis imperfecta when substituted were present in all sequences examined. Evolutionary analysis of the variable region of exon 6 points to a particular zone, rich in either amino acid insertion or deletion. We consider this region a hot spot of mutation for the mammalian amelogenin. In this region, numerous triplet repeats (PXQ) have been inserted recently and independently in five lineages, while most of the hydrophobic exon 6 region probably had its origin in several rounds of triplet insertions, early in vertebrate evolution. The putative ancestral DNA sequence of the mammalian amelogenin was calculated using a maximum likelihood approach. The putative ancestral protein was composed of 177 residues. It already contained all important amino acid positions known to date, its hydrophobic variable region was rich in proline and glutamine, and it contained triplet repeats PXQ as in the modern sequences.

Amelogenin↗

PubMed2005

Amelogenin: lessons from evolution.

Amelogenin plays a crucial role in enamel structure and mineralization, but the function of its various domains is far to be understood. Evolutionary analysis seems to be a promising way to approach structure/function relationships. In this paper, we review the knowledge of amelogenin with a particular focus on what we have learnt from evolution, and we bring new data on the origin and evolution of this molecule. The comparison of amniote (reptiles and mammals) amelogenin sequences reveals that, in contrast to the well-conserved C- and N-terminal domains, the central region (most of exon 6) is highly variable. The evolutionary analysis indicates that it was created by repeated insertion of three amino acids (triplets ProXGlu or ProXX). In several mammalian lineages a new run of triplet insertions and deletions has occurred independently in a locus considered a hot spot of mutation for mammalian amelogenin. In lizard and snake amelogenin evolves rapidly. Sequence alignment reveals that several residues in the N- and C-terminal regions were kept unchanged during 250 million years (MY), proving their importance for amelogenin structure and function. This alignment permits a rapid validation of the amelogenin mutations in human. Genome sequencing and gene mapping permitted to refine the amelogenin story, in relation to the common location (chromosome 4 in human) of several genes coding for dental proteins and SPARCL1, a SPARC (osteonectin) relative. Amelogenin shares a similar organisation with these genes and a blast search in databanks indicates a strong relationship between amelogenin, ameloblastin and enamelin. Taken together these data suggest that amelogenin could have originated from either ameloblastin or enamelin, themselves being created from SPARCL1, which itself originated from a SPARC duplication, 600 millions years ago.

Amelogenesis↗

PubMed2004

Tooth development in a scincid lizard, Chalcides viridanus (Squamata), with particular attention to enamel formation.

Comparative analysis of tooth development in the main vertebrate lineages is needed to determine the various evolutionary routes leading to current dentition in living vertebrates. We have used light, scanning and transmission electron microscopy to study tooth morphology and the main stages of tooth development in the scincid lizard, Chalcides viridanus, viz., from late embryos to 6-year-old specimens of a laboratory-bred colony, and from early initiation stages to complete differentiation and attachment, including resorption and enamel formation. In C. viridanus, all teeth of a jaw have a similar morphology but tooth shape, size and orientation change during ontogeny, with a constant number of tooth positions. Tooth morphology changes from a simple smooth cone in the late embryo to the typical adult aspect of two cusps and several ridges via successive tooth replacement at every position. First-generation teeth are initiated by interaction between the oral epithelium and subjacent mesenchyme. The dental lamina of these teeth directly branches from the basal layer of the oral epithelium. On replacement-tooth initiation, the dental lamina spreads from the enamel organ of the previous tooth. The epithelial cell population, at the dental lamina extremity and near the bone support surface, proliferates and differentiates into the enamel organ, the inner (IDE) and outer dental epithelium being separated by stellate reticulum. IDE differentiates into ameloblasts, which produce enamel matrix components. In the region facing differentiating IDE, mesenchymal cells differentiate into dental papilla and give rise to odontoblasts, which first deposit a layer of predentin matrix. The first elements of the enamel matrix are then synthesised by ameloblasts. Matrix mineralisation starts in the upper region of the tooth (dentin then enamel). Enamel maturation begins once the enamel matrix layer is complete. Concomitantly, dental matrices are deposited towards the base of the dentin cone. Maturation of the enamel matrix progresses from top to base; dentin mineralisation proceeds centripetally from the dentin-enamel junction towards the pulp cavity. Tooth attachment is pleurodont and tooth replacement occurs from the lingual side from which the dentin cone of the functional teeth is resorbed. Resorption starts from a deeper region in adults than in juveniles. Our results lead us to conclude that tooth morphogenesis and differentiation in this lizard are similar to those described for mammalian teeth. However, Tomes' processes and enamel prisms are absent.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Dentition and tooth replacement pattern in Chalcides (Squamata; Scincidae).

This study was undertaken as a prerequisite to investigations on tooth differentiation in a squamate, the Canarian scincid Chalcides. Our main goal was to determine whether the pattern of tooth replacement, known to be regular in lizards, could be helpful to predict accurately any stage of tooth development. A growth series of 20 laboratory-reared specimens, aged from 0.5 month after birth to about 6 years, was used. The dentition (functional and replacement teeth) was studied from radiographs of jaw quadrants. The number of tooth positions, the tooth number in relation to age and to seasons, and the size of the replacement teeth were recorded. In Chalcides, a single row of pleurodont functional teeth lies at the labial margin of the dentary, premaxillary, and maxillary. Whatever the age of the specimens, 16 tooth positions were recorded, on average, in each quadrant, suggesting that positions are maintained throughout life. Replacement teeth were numerous whatever the age and season, while the number of functional teeth was subject to variation. Symmetry of tooth development was evaluated by comparing teeth two by two from the opposite side in the four jaw quadrants of several specimens. Although the relative size of some replacement teeth fitted perfectly, the symmetry criterion was not reliable to predict the developmental stage of the opposite tooth, whether the pair of teeth compared was left-right or upper-lower. The best fit was found when comparing the size of successive replacement teeth from the front to the back of the jaw. Every replacement tooth that is 40-80% of its definitive size is followed, in the next position on the arcade, by a tooth that is, on average, 20% less developed. Considering teeth in alternate positions (even and odd series), each replacement tooth was a little more developed than the previous, more anterior, one (0.5-20% when the teeth are from 10-40% of their final size). The latter pattern showed that tooth replacement occurred in alternate positions from back to front, forming more or less regular rows (i.e., "Zahnreihen"). In Chalcides, the developmental stage of a replacement tooth in a position p can be accurately predicted provided the developmental stage of the replacement tooth in position p-1 or, to a lesser degree, in position p-2 is known. This finding will be particularly helpful when starting our structural and ultrastructural studies of tooth differentiation in this lizard.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

First-generation teeth in nonmammalian lineages: evidence for a conserved ancestral character?

The present study focuses on the main characteristics of first-generation teeth (i.e., the first teeth of the dentition to develop in a given position and to become functional) in representatives of the major lineages of nonmammalian vertebrates (chondrichthyans, actinopterygians, and sarcopterygians: dipnoans, urodeles, squamates, and crocodiles). Comparative investigations on the LM and TEM level reveal the existence of two major types of first-generation teeth. One type (generalized Type 1) is characterized by its small size, conical shape, atubular dentine, and small pulp cavity without capillaries and blood vessels. This type is found in actinopterygians, dipnoans, and urodeles and coincides with the occurrence of short embryonic periods in these species. The other type assembles a variety of first-generation teeth, which have in common that they represent miniature versions of adult teeth. They are generally larger than the first type, have more complex shapes, tubular dentine, and a large pulp cavity containing blood vessels. These teeth are found in chondrichtyans, squamates, and crocodiles, taxa which all share an extended embryonic period. The presence in certain taxa of a particular type of first-generation teeth is neither linked to their phylogenetic relationships nor to adult body size or tooth structure, but relates to the duration of embryonic development. Given that the plesiomorphic state in vertebrates is a short embryonic development, we consider the generalized Type 1 first-generation tooth to represent an ancestral character for gnathostomes. We hypothesize that an extended embryonic development leads to the suppression of tooth generations in the development of dentition. These may still be present in the form of rudimentary germs in the embryonic period. In our view, this generalized Type 1 first-generation teeth has been conserved through evolution because it represents a very economic and efficient way of building small and simple teeth adapted to larval life. The highly adapted adult dentition characteristic for each lineage has been possible only through polyphyodonty.

Animals↗