PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sieto Bosgra

Publications and source records attributed to Sieto Bosgra.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Proceedings in uncovering the mechanism behind peroxisome proliferator-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.

The cancer risk assessment of peroxisome proliferators (PPs) has been a matter of debate for decades. PPs are non-genotoxic carcinogens that cause liver tumours in rodents. There is considerable evidence that humans are refractory to the carcinogenic effect of PPs. Still, some toxicologists argue that these chemicals should be considered carcinogenic until the opposite has been proven. To solve this matter, much work has been dedicated to uncovering the mode of action of PPs. The proceedings are reviewed and it is discussed whether these provide an explanation for the observed interspecies differences and shed a new light on human health risk assessment. The efforts in the past years have significantly increased our understanding of the pathways involved, but have also raised new questions. The question why humans seem to be refractory is yet to be answered. From this point of view, the safety assessment of PPs to humans therefore remains an issue of discussion.

Animals↗

Probabilistic risk characterization: an example with di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.

While probabilistic methods gain attention in hazard characterization and are increasingly used in exposure assessment, full use of the available probabilistic information in risk characterization is still uncommon. Usually, after probabilistic hazard characterization and/or exposure assessment, percentiles from the obtained distributions are used as point estimates in risk characterization. In this way, all information on variability and uncertainty is lost, while these aspects are crucial in any risk assessment. In this paper, we present a method to integrate the entire distributions from probabilistic hazard characterization and exposure assessment into one risk characterization plot. This method is illustrated using di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate as an example. The final result of this probabilistic risk assessment is summarized in a single plot, containing two pieces of information: the confidence we may have in concluding there is no risk, and the fraction of the population this conclusion applies to. This information leads to a better informed conclusion on the risk of a substance, and may be very useful to define the necessary measures for risk reduction.

Adult↗