Complex regional pain syndrome and methionine-enkephalin.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Silvana F Marasco.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Primary graft failure (PGF) is the leading cause of early mortality after cardiac transplantation, accounting for 27.1% of deaths within 30 days. PGF is defined as severe dysfunction of the cardiac allograft without any obvious anatomic or immunological cause. The purpose of this study was to analyze our last 9 years of experience with cardiac transplantation to determine predictors of PGF and the influence on survival of our policy of early institution of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in these patients. METHODS: Data on 214 consecutive cardiac transplants performed at The Alfred Hospital between January 1996 and August 2004 were reviewed. PGF was defined as right or left or biventricular failure manifesting as hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg), low cardiac output (cardiac index <2.0 liter/min/m2 and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >20 mm Hg after coming off cardiopulmonary bypass despite inotropic support of up to 5 mug/min adrenaline and without any other obvious cause for the graft dysfunction. RESULTS: PGF developed in 51 patients (24%). Significant factors in the development of PGF were long ischemic time, which became significant over 4 hours (odds ratio, 1.43; p = 0.01) and increased donor age (odds ratio, 1.027; p = 0.045). Fifteen patients required mechanical support, and of these, 10 survived to leave hospital. CONCLUSIONS: PGF is the major cause of early mortality after cardiac transplantation. Significant risks for PGF are long allograft ischemic time and increased donor age. Once the patient has survived 30 days, however, the longer-term survival is not influenced by PGF. Our management strategy of early mechanical support has yielded good outcomes in this population with a high risk of early death.
Clinical report cards are at the centre of an escalating debate on ways in which the performance of hospitals and individual doctors can be monitored. Report cards are a method of publishing outcome data that can be focused on a particular hospital, clinical unit, or an individual doctor. Following the public disclosure of results of individual cardiac surgeons in New York State, USA, and the recent Inquiry into paediatric cardiac surgical deaths at the Bristol Royal Infirmary, UK, there is increasing focus on the possibility of the introduction of report cards in Australia. At present, the increasing momentum and implementation of report cards is focused squarely on surgeons, and particularly on cardiac surgeons. This review outlines the events in the USA and UK and looks into the possible impact of the introduction of report cards in Australia.
The incidence of true coronary artery aneurysms varies between 0.3% and 4.9% in patients undergoing coronary angiography. There is a predilection for the right coronary artery and a slightly higher incidence in male patients. We describe a case of right coronary artery aneurysm in a patient presenting with exertional angina. The aneurysm was successfully managed using beating-heart surgical techniques.
BACKGROUND: Heterotopic heart transplantation was first performed in humans in 1974, the main advantage being the continuing function of the patient's native heart, in the event of life-threatening acute rejection. The effect of cyclosporine on acute rejection saw the heterotopic transplantation technique wane. Our unit revisited heterotopic transplantation in response to a growing number of waiting list patients with high pulmonary artery pressures. We also anticipated an increased cardiac allograft utilization, and improvement of our waiting list times. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 151 patients undergoing heart transplantation by our unit between August 1997 and September 2003. Twenty received allografts in the heterotopic position. This cohort was compared with the 131 contemporary orthotopic heart transplant recipients with respect to their outcomes. RESULTS: The indication for transplantation was ischemic cardiomyopathy in 14 (70%) of the heterotopic cohort and 47 (36%) of the orthotopic cohort (p = 0.004), and dilated cardiomyopathy in 3 (15%) and 48 (37%) in the heterotopic and orthotopic groups, respectively (p = 0.06). Heterotopic recipients were significantly older than orthotopic recipients, and they had higher pulmonary artery pressures. The heterotopic donors were also older and the ischemic times were longer. A subgroup analysis was made among those patients who had high pulmonary artery pressures as these groups were better matched. Major morbidity in the heterotopic heart transplantation group consisted of reversible allograft dysfunction in 4 patients, renal dysfunction requiring hemofiltration in 3 patients, profound myopathy in 4 patients, and cerebrovascular events in 2 patients. There were two early deaths in the heterotopic transplant group and eight in the orthotopic group (p = 0.87). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of survival was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Heterotopic heart transplantation is a viable transplant option for selected high-risk heart transplant recipients in spite of somewhat poorer outcomes.
We summarise recent advances in transfusion medicine applicable to cardiac surgery and cardiac transplantation. It is important that clinicians know the risks of blood transfusion in Australia. They should also be aware of the different types of transfusion reaction so that there is early recognition and investigation. Blood conservation strategies including acceptance of normovolaemic anaemia in clinically stable patients are important in reducing the requirement for red cell transfusion. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative blood products are recommended for heart transplant recipients with no evidence of prior CMV infection. Leucodepletion of units of unknown CMV status reduces the risk of CMV infection and are an acceptable alternative when seronegative units are unavailable. Leucodepletion of cellular blood products has been shown to reduce infection rates postoperatively in a large trial involving cardiac surgical patients. Further studies are needed to confirm this promising finding. Irradiation of blood products eliminates the risk of transfusion-associated graft versus host disease. Routine preoperative screening for cold agglutinins is no longer recommended.
BACKGROUND: With the introduction of beating heart surgery, there has been a renewed interest in the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A small number of studies have reported markedly decreased incidences of postoperative AF in patients undergoing off-pump CABG. AIMS: The aim of the present study was to review the incidence of AF in patients undergoing off-pump CABG at Royal Melbourne Hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of 80 patients who had elective first-time CABG off-pump over a 16-month period. These patients were matched with 80 patients who underwent CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Data on preoperative and operative variables were collected. Incidences of postoperative AF in both groups were recorded. RESULTS: The incidence of AF in the off-pump group was 27 of 80 patients (34%) and in the CPB group it was 25 of 80 patients (31%; NS). Increasing age was a significant risk factor for developing postoperative AF, and beta-blockade was identified as a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump CABG does not decrease the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation. A randomised prospective trial has been commenced at Royal Melbourne Hospital to further investigate postoperative outcomes of off-pump CABG.