Biomedical subjects

Simon J Watt

Publications and source records attributed to Simon J Watt.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Depth information from focus cues--accommodation and the gradient of retinal blur--is typically incorrect in three-dimensional (3-D) displays because the light comes from a planar display surface. If the visual system incorporates information from focus cues into its calculation of 3-D scene parameters, this could cause distortions in perceived depth even when the 2-D retinal images are geometrically correct. In Experiment 1 we measured the direct contribution of focus cues to perceived slant by varying independently the physical slant of the display surface and the slant of a simulated surface specified by binocular disparity (binocular viewing) or perspective/texture (monocular viewing). In the binocular condition, slant estimates were unaffected by display slant. In the monocular condition, display slant had a systematic effect on slant estimates. Estimates were consistent with a weighted average of slant from focus cues and slant from disparity/texture, where the cue weights are determined by the reliability of each cue. In Experiment 2, we examined whether focus cues also have an indirect effect on perceived slant via the distance estimate used in disparity scaling. We varied independently the simulated distance and the focal distance to a disparity-defined 3-D stimulus. Perceived slant was systematically affected by changes in focal distance. Accordingly, depth constancy (with respect to simulated distance) was significantly reduced when focal distance was held constant compared to when it varied appropriately with the simulated distance to the stimulus. The results of both experiments show that focus cues can contribute to estimates of 3-D scene parameters. Inappropriate focus cues in typical 3-D displays may therefore contribute to distortions in perceived space.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

PubMed2004

Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination.

How does the visual system combine information from different depth cues to estimate three-dimensional scene parameters? We tested a maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) model of cue combination for perspective (texture) and binocular disparity cues to surface slant. By factoring the reliability of each cue into the combination process, MLE provides more reliable estimates of slant than would be available from either cue alone. We measured the reliability of each cue in isolation across a range of slants and distances using a slant-discrimination task. The reliability of the texture cue increases as |slant| increases and does not change with distance. The reliability of the disparity cue decreases as distance increases and varies with slant in a way that also depends on viewing distance. The trends in the single-cue data can be understood in terms of the information available in the retinal images and issues related to solving the binocular correspondence problem. To test the MLE model, we measured perceived slant of two-cue stimuli when disparity and texture were in conflict and the reliability of slant estimation when both cues were available. Results from the two-cue study indicate, consistent with the MLE model, that observers weight each cue according to its relative reliability: Disparity weight decreased as distance and |slant| increased. We also observed the expected improvement in slant estimation when both cues were available. With few discrepancies, our data indicate that observers combine cues in a statistically optimal fashion and thereby reduce the variance of slant estimates below that which could be achieved from either cue alone. These results are consistent with other studies that quantitatively examined the MLE model of cue combination. Thus, there is a growing empirical consensus that MLE provides a good quantitative account of cue combination and that sensory information is used in a manner that maximizes the precision of perceptual estimates.

Cues↗

PubMed2004

The effects of a pre-movement delay on the kinematics of prehension in middle childhood.

The present study examined the effects of a pre-movement delay on the kinematics of prehension in middle childhood. Twenty-five children between the ages of 5 and 11 years made visually open-loop reaches to two different sized objects at two different distances along the midline. Reaches took place either (i) immediately, or (ii) 2 s after the occlusion of the stimulus. In all age groups, reaches following the pre-movement delay were characterised by longer movement durations, lower peak velocities, larger peak grip apertures and longer time spent in the final slow phase of the movement. This pattern of results suggests that the representations that control the transport and grasp component are affected similarly by delay, and is consistent with the results previously reported for adults. Such representations therefore appear to develop before the age of 5.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

PubMed2004

Binocular cues and the control of prehension.

The present study was designed to assess the importance of binocular information (i.e. binocular disparity and angle of convergence) in the control of prehension. Previous studies which have addressed this question have typically used the same experimental manipulation: comparing prehensile movements executed either under binocular conditions to those executed when one eye was occluded (monocular). However this may not be the correct comparison as in addition to depriving the subject of binocular depth cues. it also deprives the subject of any visual information in one eye. Therefore we determined the prehensile performance when the subject viewed the target object and scene with either (i) two different views (binocular), (ii) two identical views (bi-ocular), or (iii) one view only (monocular). Overall, the qualitative and quantitative performance in the bi-ocular and monocular control conditions was very similar on all the main measures (and different from the performance in the binocular condition). We conclude that the deficits in performance observed found for 'monocular' reaches should be attributed to the lack of local depth information specified by the binocular cues. In addition we speculate that convergence angle and binocular disparity, although involved in both the pre-movement and movement-execution phases of the reach, the cues may be weighted differently in both phases of a prehension movement depending on the behavioural strategy involved.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Binocular vision and prehension in middle childhood.

Binocular cues have been shown previously to make an important contribution to the control of natural prehensile movements in adults [Visual Cognition 4 (1997) 113, Vision Research 32 (1992) 1513, Neuropsychologia 38 (2000) 1473]. The present study examined the role of binocular vision in the control of prehension in middle childhood. Fourteen children aged 5-6 years, and 16 children aged 10-11 years reached out and grasped different sized objects at different distances, in either binocular or monocular viewing conditions. In contrast to adult data, many of the principal kinematic indices of the children's reaches were unaffected by the removal of binocular information. The older children, like adults, spent an increased amount of time in the final approach to the object when only monocular information was available. However, both peak wrist velocities and peak grip apertures were unaffected by the removal of binocular information and continued to scale with object properties in the normal way. These results suggest that the use of binocular cues to control prehensile movements is not yet mature at the age of 10-11 years.

Child↗

PubMed2003

The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax.

The primary visual sources of depth and size information are binocular cues and motion parallax. Here, the authors determine the efficacy of these cues to control prehension by presenting them in isolation from other visual cues. When only binocular cues were available, reaches showed normal scaling of the transport and grasp components with object distance and size. However, when only motion parallax was available, only the transport component scaled reliably. No additional increase in scaling was found when both cues were available simultaneously. Therefore, although equivalent information is available from binocular and motion parallax information, the latter may be of relatively limited use for the control of the grasp. Binocular disparity appears selectively important for the control of the grasp.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2002

A dissociation of perception and action in normal human observers: the effect of temporal-delay.

Neuropsychological results support the proposal that the human visual system is organised into distinct processing pathways, one for conscious perception and one for the control of action. Here, we compare perceptual and action responses following a pre-response-delay. Experiment 1 required participants to reproduce remembered locations and found that although perceptual matches were unaffected by delays of up to 4 s, pointing responses were significantly biased after only 2 s. Experiment 2 examined whether both the transport and grasp components of a natural prehensile movement were similarly affected by delay. Both peak wrist velocities and peak grip-apertures were affected equivalently by delay, suggesting that the two components of a prehensile movement have similar temporal constraints. The results from both experiments are consistent with the general perception-action dichotomy as originally proposed by Milner and Goodale [The visual brain in action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995].

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Binocular information in the control of prehensile movements in multiple-object scenes.

Recent evidence suggests that the visual control of prehension may be less dependent on binocular information than has previously been thought. Studies investigating this question, however, have generally only examined reaches to single objects presented in isolation, even though natural prehensile movements are typically directed at objects in cluttered scenes which contain many objects. The present study was designed, therefore, to assess the contribution of binocular information to the control of prehensile movements in multiple-object scenes. Subjects reached for and grasped objects presented either in isolation or in the presence of one, two or four additional 'flanking' objects, under binocular and monocular viewing conditions. So that the role of binocular information could be clearly determined, subjects made reaches both in the absence of a visible scene around the target objects (self-illuminated objects presented in the dark) and under normal ambient lighting conditions. Analysis of kinematic parameters indicated that the removal of binocular information did not significantly affect many of the major indices of the transport component, including peak wrist velocity. However, peak grip apertures increased and subjects spent more time in the final slow phase of movement, prior to grasping the object, during monocularly guided reaches. The dissociation between effects of binocular versus monocular viewing on transport and grasp parameters was observed irrespective of the presence of flanking objects. These results therefore further question the view that binocular vision is pre-eminent in the control of natural prehensile movements.

Adult↗