Biomedical subjects

Simon Kirchberg

Publications and source records attributed to Simon Kirchberg.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Visual estimation versus quantitative assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction: a comparison by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the visual and quantitative assessment for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in normal subjects and patients with impaired LV function. METHODS: One hundred subjects (40 normal subjects, 40 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, and 20 patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy) were investigated using a 1.5-T cardiovascular magnetic resonance imager. Images were acquired by a fast gradient-echo sequence with steady-state free precession using the standard short-axis method. Left ventricular EF was calculated from the sums of the outlined areas using the Simpson rule. Interobserver variability between the calculated and the visual EF was assessed. Analyses were performed randomly and blinded by 2 independent observers. RESULTS: Left ventricular EF was significantly underestimated by the visual read in all 3 groups (mean difference: normal subjects -2.6% +/- 2.6%, ischemic cardiomyopathy -1.7% +/- 2.1%, and nonischemic cardiomyopathy -1.2% +/- 2.1%; P < or = .02). The difference was larger in normal subjects than in patients with cardiomyopathy (P = .04). The interobserver variability was smaller for the quantitative assessment than for the visual estimation. CONCLUSION: Left ventricular EF is underestimated by visual estimation compared with the quantitative assessment. The visual approach for EF assessment may be used for rapid assessment of left ventricular function in clinical practice where accuracy is of less concern. For most accurate analysis, the quantitative standard short axis approach is required.

Female↗

PubMed2005

Impact of the ECG gating method on ventricular volumes and ejection fractions assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: Most MRI centers currently use prospective ECG triggering and fast gradient-echo sequences for image acquisition. Retrospectively gated sequences allow the coverage of the entire cardiac cycle. There is concern about whether ventricular volumes and ejection fraction (EF) differ according to the gating method used for image acquisition. We sought to evaluate the impact of the gating method on measurements of right and left ventricular volumes and EF in normal subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen subjects with no cardiovascular disease were investigated by MRI using a 1.5 Tesla scanner. Images were acquired with a gradient-echo sequence with steady-state free precession (SSFP) using the standard short-axis method for volume and EF measurements. Images were acquired with 6-mn-thick slices using both prospective triggering and retrospective gating. Left and right ventricular volumes (EDV, ESV, SV) and EF were determined with a commercially available software package (Argus, Siemens). RESULTS: EDV and SV calculated from short-axis images were significantly smaller with the prospectively triggered SSFP sequence (mean difference: EDV left: 13.9 +/- 4.4 mL, p < 0.0001; SV left: 13.5 +/- 4.8 mL, p < 0.0001; EDV right: 14.2 +/- 3.9 mL, p < 0.0001; SV right: 14.7 +/- 5.9 mL, p < 0.0001). EF was significantly smaller for the right ventricle (mean difference -3.6 +/- 3.3%, p = 0.0008) and the left ventricle (mean difference -2.3 +/- 3.3%, p = 0.02). ESV remained unchanged (mean difference: ESV left: 0.47 +/- 3.5 mL, p = 0.6179; right ESV: 0.5 +/- 3.7 mL, p = 0.6083). CONCLUSION: The gating method has a significant impact on volume and EF measurements. The global ventricular EF is underestimated by using the prospective triggering technique. However, the difference in the left ventricle is small and might not be of clinical relevance.

Cardiac Output↗

PubMed2005

How much are atrial volumes and ejection fractions assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging influenced by the ECG gating method?

PURPOSE: Most magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers currently use prospective electrocardiographic (ECG) triggering for image acquisition. Retrospectively gated sequences allow the coverage of the entire cardiac cycle. It has been recently shown that ventricular volumes and ejection fraction (EF) differ according to the gating method used for image acquisition. The authors sought to evaluate how much measurements of atrial volumes and EF differ depending on the gating method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen subjects with no cardiovascular disease were investigated by MRI using a 1.5 Tesla scanner. Images were acquired with a gradient-echo sequence with steady-state free precession (SSFP) using the standard short-axis method for volume and EF measurements. Images were acquired with 6 mm thick slices using both prospective triggering and retrospective gating. Left and right atrial volumes (end diastolic volume [EDV]; end systolic volume [ESV]; stroke volume [SV]) and EF were determined with a commercially available software package. RESULTS: ESV was significantly smaller with the retrospectively gated SSFP sequence than with the prospectively triggered sequence (mean difference: ESV left 3.97 +/- 1.3 ml, p < 0.0001; ESV right 4.34 +/- 1.8 ml, p < 0.0001). EF and SV were significantly smaller with prospective triggering (mean difference: EF left -5.94 +/- 0.9%, p < 0.0001; EF right -5.52 +/- 1.3 %, p < 0.0001; SV left -3.99 +/- 1.3 ml, p < 0.0001; SV right -4.32 +/- 1.9 ml, p < 0.0001). EDV remained unchanged (mean difference: EDV left -0.03 +/- 0.8 ml, p = 0.902; right EDV 0.04 +/- 0.7 ml, p = 0.882). CONCLUSION: The gating method has a significant impact on atrial volume and EF measurements. Atrial EF is underestimated by using the prospective triggering technique.

Cardiac Volume↗

PubMed2005

Determination of normal gender-specific left atrial dimensions by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Because cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is becoming increasingly available in clinical practice, there is a need to establish normal values for left atrial dimensions as determined by this method to allow accurate assessment of cardiac dimensions and to provide standardization for follow up studies. For clinical purpose measurements of the left atrial end diastolic diameter (LAEDD) are most appropriate to assess left atrial size. We aimed to establish normal values for LAEDD using CMR and a fast gradient-echo sequence with steady-state free precession (SSFP). METHODS: A total of 111 healthy subjects (52 women and 59 men, mean age 51.5 +/- 14.5 years) were examined by CMR. Images were acquired using SSFP in the horizontal (HLA) and vertical (VLA) long axis planes and the left ventricular outflow tract plane (LVOT) to measure the LAEDD. RESULTS: Age between men and women was not different (p = 0.7050). CMR yielded the following normal ranges for LAEDD: HLA 4.5 +/- 0.4 cm for men and 4.2 +/- 0.5 for women, VLA 4.5 +/- 0.5 cm for men and 4.2 +/- 0.4 for women, and LVOT 2.8 +/- 0.3 cm for men and 2.8 +/- 0.4 for women. LAEDD were significantly larger in HLA and VLA than in LVOT (p < or = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the measurements between HLA and VLA (p = 0.4617). Gender-related differences for LAEDD were found in HLA (p = 0.0087) and VLA (p = 0.0015) but not in LVOT (p = 0.5281). LAEDD were not found to be age-related (p > or = 0.0994). CONCLUSIONS: LAEDD differ significantly according to the image plane. We provide reference values for CMR using prospective triggering in the evaluation of left atrial diameters to identify patients with enlarged left atria and for follow-up studies.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Impact of papillary muscles in ventricular volume and ejection fraction assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an accurate tool for the determination of right and left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions. However, the current standard short-axis technique is time-consuming and thus, often not practicable for routine daily use, because papillary muscles and trabeculations have to be marked and their volumes subtracted from the total ventricular volume. To reduce calculation time we evaluated the volumetric data that included papillary muscle and trabecular volumes and compared the outcome with the results of the standard technique. Thirty patients (17 healthy, 13 with coronary heart disease) were examined by CMR using TrueFISP (Magnetom, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Right and left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions were calculated using the standard short-axis technique and then again without subtracting papillary and trabecular volumes. The two methods were compared by determining the differences in results for ventricular volumes and ejection fractions. Statistically significant differences were found between the two methods for right and left ventricular stroke volumes and end-systolic volumes, and left ventricular end-diastolic volumes (EDV) (p < or = 0.011). No significant difference was found for right ventricular end-diastolic volumes (p > or = 0.149) or left or right ventricular ejection fraction (p > or = 0.130). Except in the case of left ventricular EDV, the deviations in the results of method 1 and method 2 did not vary significantly with the presence or absence of heart disease. Measurements were obtained considerably more quickly with the modified method than with the standard short-axis method (25 +/- 4 min vs. 13 +/- 3 min, p = 0.000). Although systematic differences were found when papillary and trabecular volumes were not subtracted, these differences are small and may not be of clinical relevance in healthy subjects or patients with coronary heart disease. Not subtracting the volumes of these structures enables faster determination of right and left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions without loss of the accuracy associated with the standard short-axis technique.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Assessment of left atrial volumes in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation using the biplane area-length method and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging with TrueFISP.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the biplane area-length method can be used for the evaluation of left atrial volumes and ejection fraction with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) by TrueFISP in normal subjects and patients with atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in elderly patients. Left atrial size and volumes play an important role in predicting short and long-term success after cardioversion. METHODS: Fifteen healthy subjects (mean age 65.6+/-6.4 years) and 18 patients (mean age 67.2+/-8.8 years) with atrial fibrillation were examined by CMR (Magnetom, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Images were acquired by TrueFISP using the horizontal and vertical long-axis plane to measure left atrial end-diastolic and end-systolic areas and longitudinal dimensions. Volumes were determined with commercially available software. Left atrial end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF) were determined by the biplane area-length method and compared to findings obtained by the standard short-axis method. Images were acquired and analyzed a second time in the patients with atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: There was no difference in age between men and women (p=0.147) and healthy subjects and patients (p=0.128) included in the study. EDV and ESV were significantly higher and SV and EF significantly lower in patients with atrial fibrillation than in healthy subjects (p < or = 0.009), regardless of the method used. The values obtained for EDV and ESV by the biplane area-length method were significantly higher in both healthy subjects (p<0.001) and patients with atrial fibrillation (p<0.001) than those obtained by the standard short-axis approach, whereas SV (p> or = 0.057) and EF (p> or = 0.118) did not differ significantly. In the second investigation in patients with atrial fibrillation, ESV, SV, and EF did not differ significantly between the two methods (p> or =0.481). Assessment of interobserver variability revealed good agreement in the findings of the two observers, both in normal sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation (overall variability 0.8+/-6.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The biplane area-length method can be used in CMR images obtained by TrueFISP to assess left atrial volumes and ejection fraction in normal subjects and patients with varying cardiac cycle length, as in atrial fibrillation.

Aged↗