Biomedical subjects

Simona Panni

Publications and source records attributed to Simona Panni.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Selectivity and promiscuity in the interaction network mediated by protein recognition modules.

A substantial fraction of protein interactions in the cell is mediated by families of protein modules binding to relatively short linear peptides. Many of these interactions have a high dissociation constant and are therefore suitable for supporting the formation of dynamic complexes that are assembled and disassembled during signal transduction. Extensive work in the past decade has shown that, although member domains within a family have some degree of intrinsic peptide recognition specificity, the derived interaction networks display substantial promiscuity. We review here recent advances in the methods for deriving the portion of the protein network mediated by these domain families and discuss how specific biological outputs could emerge in vivo despite the observed promiscuity in peptide recognition in vitro.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Protein interaction networks by proteome peptide scanning.

A substantial proportion of protein interactions relies on small domains binding to short peptides in the partner proteins. Many of these interactions are relatively low affinity and transient, and they impact on signal transduction. However, neither the number of potential interactions mediated by each domain nor the degree of promiscuity at a whole proteome level has been investigated. We have used a combination of phage display and SPOT synthesis to discover all the peptides in the yeast proteome that have the potential to bind to eight SH3 domains. We first identified the peptides that match a relaxed consensus, as deduced from peptides selected by phage display experiments. Next, we synthesized all the matching peptides at high density on a cellulose membrane, and we probed them directly with the SH3 domains. The domains that we have studied were grouped by this approach into five classes with partially overlapping specificity. Within the classes, however, the domains display a high promiscuity and bind to a large number of common targets with comparable affinity. We estimate that the yeast proteome contains as few as six peptides that bind to the Abp1 SH3 domain with a dissociation constant lower than 100 microM, while it contains as many as 50-80 peptides with corresponding affinity for the SH3 domain of Yfr024c. All the targets of the Abp1 SH3 domain, identified by this approach, bind to the native protein in vivo, as shown by coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Finally, we demonstrate that this strategy can be extended to the analysis of the entire human proteome. We have developed an approach, named WISE (whole interactome scanning experiment), that permits rapid and reliable identification of the partners of any peptide recognition module by peptide scanning of a proteome. Since the SPOT synthesis approach is semiquantitative and provides an approximation of the dissociation constants of the several thousands of interactions that are simultaneously analyzed in an array format, the likelihood of each interaction occurring in any given physiological settings can be evaluated. WISE can be easily extended to a variety of protein interaction domains, including those binding to modified peptides, thereby offering a powerful proteomic tool to help completing a full description of the cell interactome.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

In vitro evolution of recognition specificity mediated by SH3 domains reveals target recognition rules.

We have designed a repertoire of 10(7) different SH3 domains by grafting the residues that are represented in the binding surfaces of natural SH3 domains onto the scaffold of the human Abl-SH3 domain. This phage-displayed library was screened by affinity selection for SH3 domains that bind to the synthetic peptides, APTYPPPLPP and LSSRPLPTLPSP, which are peptide ligands for the human Abl or Src SH3 domains, respectively. By characterizing the isolates, we have observed that as few as two or three amino acid substitutions lead to dramatic changes in recognition specificity. We propose that the ability to shift recognition specificity with a small number of amino acid replacements is an important evolutionary characteristic of protein binding modules. Furthermore, we have used the information obtained by these in vitro evolution experiments to generate a scoring matrix that evaluates the probability that any SH3 domain binds to the peptide ligands for the Abl and Src SH3 domains. A table of predictions for the 28 SH3 domains of baker's yeast is presented.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

Can we infer peptide recognition specificity mediated by SH3 domains?

Protein interaction domain families that modulate the formation of macromolecular complexes recognize specific sequence or structural motifs. For instance SH3 and WW domains bind to polyproline peptides while SH2 and FHA domains bind to peptides phosphorylated in Tyr and Thr respectively. Within each family, variations in the chemical characteristics of the domain binding pocket modulate a finer peptide recognition specificity and, as a consequence, determine the selection of functional protein partners in vivo. In the proteomic era there is the need for reliable inference methods to help restricting the sequence space of the putative targets to be confirmed experimentally by more laborious experimental approaches. Here we will review the published data about the peptide recognition specificity of the SH3 domain family and we will propose a classification of SH3 domains into eight classes. Finally, we will discuss whether the available information is sufficient to infer the recognition specificity of any uncharacterized SH3 domain.

Amino Acid Sequence↗