Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Siwan Thomas-Gibson.
The authors hope that the combination of ScopeGuide imager (to make sense of colon looping) and the new-generation Colonoscopy Simulator (allowing structured teaching and repetitive practice) will make it possible to accelerate colonoscopy training and perhaps also will provide an acceptable way of re-honing the skills of existing endoscopists.
Colonoscopy traditionally has been taught using the apprenticeship approach. Assessment of competence has been, at best, informal and based largely on the number of procedures trainees have performed. The advent of colorectal cancer screening has demanded formalization of training and assessment using structured teaching and state-of-the-art training tools, such as computer simulation. New-generation approaches and technology have the ability to raise the standard of coloscopy provided by competent practitioners.
INTRODUCTION: Self-expanding metal stents are now an established treatment for malignant colonic obstruction. Favorable outcomes have been reported both for cancer palliation and treatment of acute obstruction as a "bridge" to surgery. However, little data exists regarding the use of stents for benign colonic obstruction. METHODS: All cases of colonic stent insertion occurring between December 1996 to October 2002 were reviewed. During the study period, 36 patients with malignant obstruction and 6 patients with benign obstructive disease underwent placement of self-expandable stents using a combined endoscopic and fluoroscopic technique. RESULTS: Stent placement was successful in 36 of 42 patients (86 percent). Complications occurred in 16 of 36 patients (44 percent): migration (n = 7), reobstruction (n = 5), perforation (n = 2), fistula formation (n = 1), and stent fracture (n = 1). Stent placement was successful in 100 percent of patients with benign strictures but poststent migration was frequent (2/6). CONCLUSIONS: Stent insertion provided an effective outcome in patients with malignant colonic obstruction as a palliative and preoperative therapy. Although a relatively high migration rate was observed in patients with benign strictures, stenting was still effective in providing luminal patency (median follow-up, 7.5 months). Stenting should be considered as a first-line treatment for malignant strictures and as a potential therapy for selected benign strictures.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Injectable lipid emulsion is an important component of parenteral nutrition. ClinOleic is a lipid emulsion composed of olive oil (80%) and soybean oil (20%). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ClinOleic in adults already receiving parenteral nutrition, comparing it to their usual lipid (soybean-oil-based). METHODS: Thirteen adults dependent on home parenteral nutrition were recruited from a single hospital. ClinOleic was administered for 6 months. Two-monthly assessments were made. In addition, clinical and adverse events were recorded for 6-month periods before, during and after the study. RESULTS: Total numbers of important complications for the 6 months before, during and after the study were 13, 9 and 9, respectively. There were, respectively, 5, 3 and 2 line infections, and 2, 0 and 5 thrombotic episodes in the 3 periods. The numbers of unplanned admissions were, respectively, 8, 5 and 7, with in-patient days accounting for 3.4%, 1.5%, and 2.6% of feeding days, respectively. One patient died (pneumonia). One new case of cholecystolithiasis appeared. CONCLUSION: ClinOleic may be used as a safe alternative to standard soybean-oil-based lipid emulsions.
OBJECTIVE: To study the long-term outcomes of patients who have had endoscopic balloon dilation of Crohn's strictures. DESIGN: Retrospective case-note review over a 16-year period. PATIENTS: Patients with a Crohn's stricture causing obstructive symptoms and who had at least 6 months' follow-up data or a surgical outcome following dilation were sought; 59 patients (124 dilations) were identified. INTERVENTION: Patients all underwent endoscopic balloon dilation. RESULTS: Strictures were anastomotic in 53 patients (111 dilations) and de novo in six patients (13 dilations). The median stricture length was 3.0 cm. Median follow-up time was 29.4 months. Out of the total group, 41% of patients achieved long-term clinical benefit following dilation and in 17% after only a single dilation. The median number of dilations per patient was one. A total of 35 (59%) patients required surgery for their stricture during follow-up. There were two (1.6%) perforations as a result of dilation, one in an anastomotic stricture (managed conservatively) and one in a de-novo stricture (requiring surgery). There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopic balloon dilation of Crohn's strictures can achieve long-term clinical benefit in many patients. Repeat dilations are justified in initial non-responders. In this series, the procedure appears safe with low morbidity.
BACKGROUND: Counting the number of procedures performed provides at best a crude measure of technical competence in colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a qualitative and a quantitative score for measuring technical competency in colonoscopy using videotape evaluation. METHODS: Eighteen endoscopists with varying levels of experience were prospectively videotaped during colonoscope insertion. The following were recorded simultaneously: a closed circuit television view showing instrument handling, the endoscopic luminal view, and a continuous display of the colonoscope configuration (magnetic endoscope imaging). Videotapes were reviewed blindly and in random order by 3 experts. Performance in 3 categories was evaluated: (1) manipulation of instrument controls (0-10), (2) manipulation of the insertion tube (0-6) and (3) depth of insertion (0-4). A global assessment of competence was given for each endoscopist. RESULTS: Comparing the total scores as assessed by the 3 blinded experts, for each individual endoscopist, there were significant differences. However, there was good interobserver agreement and correlation between the individual scores and global assessment ratings of competence (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The video assessment tool described appears to measure technical competence at colonoscopy, although in its present form it lacks reliability. Refinement of the score may improve reliability and deserves further evaluation.
Provisional reports from the Intercollegiate British Society of Gastroenterology National Colonoscopy audit show completion rates of 57-77% for the procedure and poor levels of training and supervision. We prospectively audited all aspects of colonoscopy performed at a combined district general hospital and specialist endoscopy unit. Details of referral, examination, endoscopist, complications and follow-up were recorded and patients were sent questionnaires for long-term follow-up. 505 patients (246 male) underwent colonoscopy by 27 different endoscopists. Their median age was 57 years (range 13-92) and 93% were outpatients. 64% patients were symptomatic and 36% were having surveillance or follow-up colonoscopy. The overall caecal intubation rate was 93%, with little difference between surgeons, physicians and experienced trainees (89%, 92%, 94%) and specialist endoscopists (98%). In only one case was an inexperienced trainee (<100 procedures) unsupervised. Pain scores estimated by the endoscopist were well matched with those given by the patient-medians 29 and 26 (maximum 100) respectively. Median satisfaction score was 96 (maximum 100). Polyp pick-up rate was 26.9% and there were 11 new cancers. 16 (3%) minor immediate complications were recorded-5 oversedation, 6 vasovagal attacks, 3 polypectomy haemorrhages and 2 mucosal injuries (neither requiring treatment). 3 patients died within 6 months of follow-up but no death was colonoscopy related. Completion rates in this setting were adequate for all endoscopists studied. Patient satisfaction with the procedure was high and very few immediate or long-term complications were encountered.