PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Soile Tapio

Publications and source records attributed to Soile Tapio.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Radioadaptive response revisited.

Radiation-induced adaptive response belongs to the group of non-targeted effects that do not require direct exposure of the cell nucleus by radiation. It is described as the reduced damaging effect of a challenging radiation dose when induced by a previous low priming dose. Adaptive responses have been observed in vitro and in vivo using various indicators of cellular damage, such as cell lethality, chromosomal aberrations, mutation induction, radiosensitivity, and DNA repair. Adaptive response can be divided into three successive biological phenomena, the intracellular response, the extracellular signal, and the maintenance. The intracellular response leading to adaptation of a single cell is a complex biological process including induction or suppression of gene groups. An extracellular signal, the nature of which is unknown, may be sent by the affected cell to neighbouring cells causing them to adapt as well. This occurs either by a release of diffusible signalling molecules or by gap-junction intercellular communication. Adaptive response can be maintained for periods ranging from of a few hours to several months. Constantly increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or nitric oxide (NO) have been observed in adapted cells and both factors may play a role in the maintenance process. Although adaptive response seems to function by an on/off principle, it is a phenomenon showing a high degree of inter- and intraindividual variability. It remains to be seen to what extent adaptive response is functional in humans at relevant dose and dose-rate exposures. A better understanding of adaptive response and other non-targeted effects is needed before they can be confirmed as risk estimate factors for the human population at low levels of ionising radiation.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Arsenic in the aetiology of cancer.

Arsenic, one of the most significant hazards in the environment affecting millions of people around the world, is associated with several diseases including cancers of skin, lung, urinary bladder, kidney and liver. Groundwater contamination by arsenic is the main route of exposure. Inhalation of airborne arsenic or arsenic-contaminated dust is a common health problem in many ore mines. This review deals with the questions raised in the epidemiological studies such as the dose-response relationship, putative confounders and synergistic effects, and methods evaluating arsenic exposure. Furthermore, it describes the metabolic pathways of arsenic, and its biological modes of action. The role of arsenic in the development of cancer is elucidated in the context of combined epidemiological and biological studies. However, further analyses by means of molecular epidemiology are needed to improve the understanding of cancer aetiology induced by arsenic.

Arsenic↗

Combined effects of gamma radiation and arsenite on the proteome of human TK6 lymphoblastoid cells.

Arsenic present in drinking water and mining environments in some areas has been associated with an increased rate of skin and internal cancers. Contrary to the epidemiological evidence in humans, arsenic does not induce cancer in animal models, but is able to enhance the mutagenicity of other agents. In order to achieve a better understanding of the interaction between arsenic and ionising radiation, an investigation was conducted to detect differences at the proteome level of human TK6 lymphoblastoid cells exposed to these agents. Cells were exposed to either a single dose of 1-Gy 137Cs-gamma-rays or to 1 microM arsenite (As(III)) or to both agents in combination. Two-dimensional (2D) electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) were employed for the screening and identification of proteins, respectively. It proved possible to identify seven proteins with significantly affected abundance, three of which showed increased levels and the remaining four showed decreased levels under at least one of the exposure conditions. Following arsenite treatment or irradiation, a significant increase compared with that of the control was observed for glutathione (GSH) transferase omega 1 and proteasome subunit beta type 4 precursor. The combined exposure did not result in an induction of the enzymes. The expression of electron-transfer flavoprotein subunit alpha was found to be enhanced under all three-exposure conditions. Ubiquinol-cytochrome C reductase complex core protein I, adenine phosphoribosyl transferase and endoplasmic reticulum protein hERp29 showed decreased levels after irradiation or arsenite treatment, but not after the combined exposure. The level of serine/threonine protein phosphatase 1 alpha decreased with all treatments. The main conclusions are that both arsenite and gamma-radiation influence the levels of several proteins involved in major metabolic and regulatory pathways, either directly or by triggering the defence mechanisms of the cell. The combined effect of both exposures on the level of some essential proteins such as glutathione transferase, proteasome or serine/threonine phosphatase may contribute to the co-carcinogenic effect of arsenic.

Animals↗