Biomedical subjects

Sonja I Berndt

Publications and source records attributed to Sonja I Berndt.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Identification of immune cell type-specific susceptibility genes in multiple cancers using transcriptome-wide association studies.

BACKGROUND: Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) integrate gene expression and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify disease susceptibility genes. Because gene expression varies substantially across cell types within tissues, cell type-specific prediction models may enhance the power of TWAS. METHODS: We conducted cell type-specific TWAS leveraging single-cell RNA sequencing data from the OneK1K cohort (14 immune cell types, 1.27 million cells) and GWAS summary statistics for 7 cancers (>290 000 cases in total). To improve prediction accuracy, we developed a modeling framework that incorporates shared gene expression effects across cell types. RESULTS: At a false discovery rate of 5%, we identified 106 (Bonferroni 5%: 13) previously unreported loci for breast cancer, 51 (4) loci for prostate cancer, 11 (4) loci for lung cancer, 39 (5) loci for melanoma, 9 (1) loci for ovarian cancer, and 2 (1) loci for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, with most genes exhibiting cell type specificity. Gene set analyses confirmed joint associations of unreported genes with breast and prostate cancer risk in UK Biobank data. Additional lung tissue single-cell RNA sequencing data with 113 individuals validated 18 of 32 (56.3%) statistically significant genes for lung cancer. Across cancers, 139 statistically significant genes were shared by at least 2 cancer types and were primarily enriched in specific immune cell types. CONCLUSION: Cell type-specific TWAS improve the identification of novel cancer susceptibility loci and provide insights into the immune landscape of cancer etiology.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

MyGeneRisk Colon: A Web-Based Tool for Personalized Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction Based on Genetics and Lifestyle.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death, with incidence rising substantially among individuals under 50 years of age. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) hold promise for identifying high-risk individuals; when combined with lifestyle factors, they substantially improve prediction accuracy compared with models based on lifestyle factors alone. However, few clinical tools currently exist that facilitate this integrated, PRS-enhanced risk assessment. To bridge this gap, we developed MyGeneRisk Colo n, a publicly accessible web portal that delivers individualized CRC risk prediction by incorporating genetic, demographic, family history, and lifestyle factors. This paper details the development of the underlying risk prediction model, the portal's architecture and data security, our reporting framework, and engagement with a community advisory panel. Designed as a user-friendly platform, MyGeneRisk Colon aims to effectively communicate personalized CRC risk profiles and educate users and healthcare providers about prevention strategies.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2025

Genetic risk factors modulate the association between physical activity and colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) is an established protective factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), but it is unclear if genetic variants modify this effect. To investigate this possibility, we conducted a genome-wide gene-PA interaction analysis. METHODS: Using logistic regression and two-step and joint tests, we analyzed interactions between common genetic variants across the genome and PA in relation to CRC risk. Self-reported PA levels were categorized as active (≥ 8.75 MET-h/wk) vs. inactive (< 8.75 MET-h/wk) and as study- and sex-specific quartiles of activity. RESULTS: PA had an overall protective effect on CRC (OR [active vs. inactive] = 0.85; 95%CI = 0.81-0.90). The two-step GxE method identified an interaction between rs4779584, an intergenic variant near the GREM1 and SCG5 genes, and PA for CRC risk (p-interaction = 2.6×10- 8). Stratification by genotype at this locus showed a significant reduction in CRC risk by 20% in active vs. inactive participants with the CC genotype (OR = 0.80; 95%CI = 0.75-0.85), but no significant PA-CRC association among CT or TT carriers. When PA was modeled as quartiles, the 1-d.f. GxE test identified that rs56906466, an intergenic variant near the KCNG1 gene, modified the association between PA and CRC (p-interaction = 3.5×10- 8). Stratification at this locus showed that increase in PA (highest vs. lowest quartile) was associated with a lower CRC risk solely among TT carriers (OR = 0.77; 95%CI = 0.72-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we identified two genetic variants that modified the association between PA and CRC risk. One of them, related to GREM1 and SCG5, suggests that the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-related, inflammatory, and/or insulin signaling pathways may be associated with the protective influence of PA on colorectal carcinogenesis.

GWAS↗