PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stéphane Zaza

Publications and source records attributed to Stéphane Zaza.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

[Hepatorenal syndrome in patients with liver cirrhosis].

Hepatorenal syndrome is a particular form of functional renal failure which may develop in patients with liver cirrhosis. On a clinical standpoint, precise diagnostic criteria have been established to clearly define this entity, whereas recent advances in the understanding of the biology of vasoactive mediators and the physiology of microcirculation have allowed to better anticipate its pathophysiological mechanisms. During the course of cirrhosis, sinusoidal portal hypertension leads to splanchnic and systemic vasodilation, responsible for a reduction of effective arterial blood volume. As a result, a state of intense renal vasoconstriction develops, leading to renal failure in the absence of any organic renal disease. At this stage, liver transplantation is the only definitive therapy able to reverse renal dysfunction. In recent years, innovative therapies have shown promise to prolong survival in patients with hepatorenal syndrome, including the administration of analogs of vasopressin (mainly terlipressin), the insertion of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and the use of novel techniques of dialysis. On a preventive viewpoint, several simple measures have been shown to reduce the risk of hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhotic patients, including the appropriate use of diuretics, the avoidance of nephrotoxic drugs, the prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and optimal fluid management in patients undergoing large volume paracentesis.

Hepatorenal Syndrome↗

Optimizing sequential biventricular pacing using radionuclide ventriculography.

BACKGROUND: Biventricular pacemakers are usually programmed with the default setting of synchronous biventricular pacing, although the ventricles may be paced sequentially. Whether this parameter is important for optimizing resynchronization therapy is not clear. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether sequential pacing acutely improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and dyssynchrony and to assess the feasibility of nuclear ventriculography for device optimization. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients implanted with a biventricular pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for heart failure were studied. LVEF was measured using planar radionuclide ventriculography during simultaneous biventricular pacing and during sequential pacing at four different interventricular intervals ranging from LV-40 (preexciting the left ventricle by 40 ms) to LV+40 (preexciting the right ventricle). Interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony were analyzed by phase analysis at each setting. RESULTS: There was great heterogeneity in individual response to VV interval programming. Twenty-four of 27 patients (89%) had significant changes (both favorable and unfavorable) in LVEF at different interventricular delays, with variations of up to 10% in absolute terms. Simultaneous biventricular pacing yielded maximal LVEF in 9 of 27 patients (33%), with a relative increase in LVEF of 18 +/- 14% by optimized sequential pacing in the remaining patients. Interventricular dyssynchrony varied significantly, with least dyssynchrony at the LV-20 setting (P = .024). There were no significant differences in intraventricular dyssynchrony at the different settings. CONCLUSION: Programming VV intervals has considerable impact on LVEF. However, there is a great degree of variation between patients in response to these settings, requiring individual assessment for device optimization.

Aged↗