PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stefano Riccio

Publications and source records attributed to Stefano Riccio.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Lip-splitting in transmandibular resections: is it really necessary?

Mandibular resection approach (Commando or Composite resection) is one of the fundamental techniques for oral and oropharyngeal large tumour resection. We reviewed the charts of patients who underwent a transmandibular resection for an oral and/or oropharyngeal cancer between 1980 and 2002. Of 700 patients who underwent a mandibular resection for cancer, 332 had been operated without lower lip splitting. A mono or bilateral en-block neck dissection was always performed, except in cases of relapses after a prior surgical treatment with neck dissection. We repaired 307 patients with flaps (pedicled or free flaps, with or without bone). Unsplitting of the lip never complicated resection and reconstruction. Furthermore the procedure was time sparing, as we avoided haemostasis and suture of the lip. The cosmetic results were better than those obtained by traditional technique. We used a non-lip-splitting technique also for pull-through, marginal mandibulectomy and, sometimes, for mandibular-swing approaches. In the latter case, the technique has some advantages and disadvantages and must be applied according to circumstances. We can conclude that lip-splitting in transmandibular resection for oral and oropharyngeal tumours is not necessary.

Humans↗

Craniofacial resection for malignant tumours involving the anterior skull base.

Ethmoid malignant tumours are rare, but nearly all at least approach or involve the lamina cribrosa. An anterior craniofacial resection is almost always mandatory for a radical resection. While almost everything has been written about technical details, few studies reported meaningful analysis about prognostic factors and long-term results, for a series of reasons: the infrequency of these tumours, the variety of histologies, small patients cohorts presented by each author, a medley of untreated and pre-treated patients, the lack of a universally accepted classification. We perform a review of the literature in the light of our experience of 330 anterior craniofacial resections for ethmoid malignant tumours. We present our classification of ethmoid malignant tumours (called INT, Istituto Nazionale Tumori). It turned out to be more prognostic than AJCC-UICC classification.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Which classification for ethmoid malignant tumors involving the anterior skull base?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare three systems of classification for malignant ethmoidal tumors in patients undergoing anterior craniofacial resection. METHODS: A radiologic locoregional evaluation of 241 patients with malignant ethmoid tumors was performed before patients underwent an anterior craniofacial resection. Disease in each case was staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer-Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (AJCC-UICC) 1997 classification, the AJCC-UICC 2002 classification, and the Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT) classification. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models were used to investigate the prognostic value of each classification system on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The classifications were compared in terms of prognostic discrimination capability, measured by use of an index of agreement between each classification and DFS or OS time. RESULTS: All three classification systems yielded statistically significant results in the Cox analysis, both for DFS and OS. In the AJCC-UICC 2002 system, minor differences were observed between T1 and T3 tumors. The INT classification showed a progressive worsening of the prognosis with increasing stage. The index of prognostic discrimination favored the INT classification over both the 1997 and 2002 AJCC-UICC classifications. CONCLUSIONS: Both the 1997 and 2002 AJCC-UICC classifications seemed to have limited prognostic value. By contrast, the INT classification satisfied one of the main goals of tumor staging, demonstrating the progressive worsening of prognosis with different tumor classes.

Adolescent↗

Absence of otoacoustic emissions in insulin-dependent diabetic patients: is there evidence for diabetic cochleopathy?

In order to evaluate cochlear function in Type 1 diabetes mellitus, this study analyses otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) on normal hearing subjects with diabetes and on controls. Patients with Type 1 diabetes (n=60), with a mean age of 31+/-6.23 years, mean disease duration of 17.5+/-8.9 years, and mean HbA1c of 8.1+/-1.8%, of whom 43% had signs of retinopathy and 28% had clinical signs of neuropathy, were studied. All patients underwent an OAE analysis and brainstem-evoked potentials. Fifty-eight normal volunteers were used as controls for the OAE analysis. Seventeen patients (28.3%) had no OAEs in at least one ear and 10% in both ears. The mean intensity of the response was lower in diabetic subjects [7.1+/-4.4 vs. 10.9+/-9.3 dB SPL (sound pressure level)] than in controls. The cochlear impairment was over 5 dB for the 1-kHz frequency, which is the critical level for speech understanding. These findings suggest that cochleopathy can be detected in a relatively high proportion of subjects with Type 1 diabetes in spite of a normal audiometric hearing threshold.

Adult↗

Prophylactic thyroidectomy in MEN 2A syndrome.

Genetic testing is the appropriate procedure in MEN 2A syndrome for the early diagnosis of medullary carcinoma even at a preclinical stage. Prophylactic total thyroidectomy represents the standard preventive and therapeutic surgical approach in the treatment of medullary thyroid carcinoma in MEN 2A syndrome. Our experience has confirmed the presence of CCH and medullary thyroid carcinoma even in clinically negative patients, in agreement with reports in the literature.

Adult↗