PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stephanie Wilson

Publications and source records attributed to Stephanie Wilson.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A method for determining information flow breakdown in clinical systems.

This paper presents Determining Information flow Breakdown (DIB), a method for analyzing adverse events in clinical environments from the perspective of breakdowns in information flow. The larger context for DIB is that it is the first stage in a process that promotes organizational learning in response to adverse events through the design of novel IT solutions. DIB is based on the theoretical view of distributed cognition and adopts a system-wide view of failures. DIB is both a reactive and a proactive method in that it aims to locate the causes of either actual or potential adverse events by investigating all elements of the system related to a chosen aspect of patient care. It was developed and evolved using a case study approach whereby data on actual and potential adverse events in clinical environments was collected, modeled and analyzed using successive versions of the method. We provide an explanation and overview of the DIB method, and discuss our experiences of applying it in practice via a detailed example.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: predicting success using contrast-enhanced sonography.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study compared the utility of immediate postprocedural contrast-enhanced sonography with that of delayed enhanced sonography and CT or MRI in assessing the success of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two lesions (1.5-3.7 cm) were studied in 19 patients. Enhanced sonography was performed before and within 1 hr after radiofrequency ablation. At routine 2-week follow-up CT or MRI, additional enhanced sonography was performed. The findings of preablation CT or MRI and enhanced sonography were compared with those of postprocedural and follow-up enhanced sonography by three radiologists experienced in these techniques. The reviewers were unaware of the follow-up CT or MRI results (reference standard). Technical adequacy, ablation zone targeting, and identification of residual disease were assessed by each reviewer, and the results were analyzed by consensus. RESULTS: One postprocedural sonographic study was considered technically inadequate. Postprocedural sonography predicted the follow-up CT or MRI results in 76% (16/21) of subjects (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 40%; positive predictive value [PPV], 82%; negative predictive value, [NPV] 50%). Follow-up CT or MRI identified accurate targeting in 17 of 22 subjects. Follow-up sonography agreed with CT or MRI in 82% (18/22) of subjects (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 67%; PPV, 88%; NPV, 67%). Postprocedural sonography predicted the follow-up CT or MRI results in 81% (17/21) of subjects (sensitivity, 40%; specificity, 94%; PPV, 66%; NPV, 83%). Follow-up CT or MRI detected residual disease in six subjects. Follow-up sonography agreed with CT or MRI in 91% (20/22) of subjects (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 94%; PPV, 83%; NPV, 94%). CONCLUSION: Postprocedural enhanced sonography has the potential to guide completion of radiofrequency ablation at the time of initial therapy when residual disease is detected. The procedure is less accurate in detection of residual disease than is either delayed enhanced sonography or CT or MRI.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Improved detection of hepatic metastases with pulse-inversion US during the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A: multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To compare conventional B-mode ultrasonography (US) alone with the combination of conventional B-mode US and contrast material-enhanced (SHU 508A) late-phase pulse-inversion US for the detection of hepatic metastases by using dual-phase spiral computed tomography (CT) as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients underwent conventional US, US in the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A, and single-section spiral CT. US and CT images were assessed by blinded readers. Differences in sensitivity, specificity, and the number and smallest size of metastases at conventional and contrast-enhanced US were compared by using CT as the standard of reference. Lesion conspicuity was assessed objectively (quantitatively) and subjectively by one reader before and after contrast material administration. RESULTS: In 45 of 80 (56%) patients with metastases, more metastases were seen at contrast-enhanced US than at conventional US. In three of these patients, conventional US images appeared normal. The addition of contrast-enhanced US improved sensitivity for the detection of individual metastases from 71% to 87% (P <.001). On a patient basis, sensitivity improved from 94% to 98% (P =.44), and specificity improved from 60% to 88% (P <.01). Contrast enhancement improved the subjective conspicuity of metastases in 66 of 75 (88%) patients and the objective contrast by a mean of 10.8 dB (P <.001). Contrast-enhanced US showed more metastases than did CT in seven patients, and CT showed more than did contrast-enhanced US in one of 22 patients in whom an independent reference (magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative US, or pathologic findings) was available. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced US improved sensitivity and specificity in the detection of hepatic metastases.

Adolescent↗