PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stephen Bridgman

Publications and source records attributed to Stephen Bridgman.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Total knee arthroplasty: good agreement of clinical severity scores between patients and consultants.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 20,000 patients per year in the UK receive total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One of the problems faced by the health services of many developed countries is the length of time patients spend waiting for elective treatment. We therefore report the results of a study in which the Salisbury Priority Scoring System (SPSS) was used by both the surgeon and their patients to ascertain whether there were differences between the surgeon generated and patient generated Salisbury Priority Scores. METHODS: The Salisbury Priority Scoring System (SPSS) was used to assign relative priority to patients with knee osteoarthritis as part of a randomised controlled trial comparing the standard medial parapatellar approach versus the sub-vastus approach in TKA. The operating surgeons and each patient completed the SPSS at the same pre-assessment clinic. The SPSS assesses four criteria, namely progression of disease, pain or distress, disability or dependence on others, and loss of usual occupation. Crosstabs and agreement measures (Cohen's kappa) were performed. RESULTS: Overall, the four SPSS criteria showed a kappa value of 0.526, 0.796, 0.813, and 0.820, respectively, showing moderate to very good agreement between the patient and the operating consultant. Male patients showed better agreement than female patients. CONCLUSION: The Salisbury Priority Scoring System is a good means of assessing patients' needs in relation to elective surgery, with high agreement between the patient and the operating surgeon.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee↗
PubMed2006

Sub-vastus approach versus the medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN44544446].

BACKGROUND: Thirty thousand knee replacements are performed annually in the UK. There is uncertainty as to the best surgical approach to the knee joint for knee arthroplasty. We planned a randomised controlled trial to compare a standard medial parapatellar arthrotomy with sub-vastus arthrotomy for patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty in terms of short and long term knee function. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty at the local NHS Trust are to be recruited into the study. Patients are to be randomised into either the sub-vastus or medial parapatellar approach to knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome measures will be the American Knee Society and WOMAC Scores. The secondary outcome measures will be patient based measures of EuroQol and SF-36. All outcomes will be measured pre-operatively, 1, 6, 12 and 52 weeks post-operatively. We will also review pain intensity using a pain and analgesia diary. Ease of surgical exposure and complications will also be analysed. DISCUSSION: Evidence is lacking concerning the best surgical approach to the knee joint for patients undergoing primary total knee replacement. This pragmatic randomised trial tests the hypothesis that the sub-vastus approach is significantly superior to the standard medial parapatellar approach in terms of short and long term knee function.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2005

Psychosexual health 5 years after hysterectomy: population-based comparison with endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

BACKGROUND: We report a population-based comparison of psychosexual health 5 years after contrasting amounts of surgical treatments for heavy periods [dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB)]. Women's fears about sexual function after hysterectomy might not be unfounded. The psychosexual problems may return and/or develop with time. The removal of ovaries at the time of hysterectomy is associated with greater deterioration of self-reported sexual function. Surgical menopause significantly impairs sexual wellbeing. We failed to observe uniform beneficial effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on reported psychosexual health. OBJECTIVE: To compare self-reported bothersome sexual function; loss of interest in sex, difficulty in becoming sexually excited and vaginal dryness 5 years after surgical management of DUB [transcervical endometrial resection/ablation (TCRE) or subtotal and total hysterectomy, with and without prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy (BO)]. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study up to 5 years post-surgery for DUB, TCRE or hysterectomy, with or without BO. SETTING: Over 400 NHS and private hospitals in England, Northern Ireland and Wales. COHORT: Of 11,325 women who responded to the 5-year questionnaire, over 9500 (84%) were valid cases, and over 8900 (94%) did complete the questions relating to psychosexual function. Most were between the ages of 39 and 45 years, married or cohabiting. MAIN OUTCOMES: Self-reported experience of bother, recorded as 'some', 'severe' and 'extreme', to questions on (1) libido loss, (2) difficulty with sexual arousal, and (3) vaginal dryness during the past 4 weeks, 5 years after surgery. RESULTS: Five years after surgery for DUB, the crude and adjusted prevalence of psychosexual problems was higher after hysterectomy than after TCRE. Amongst the women with concurrent BO, the age- and HRT-adjusted odds ratios for extreme psychosexual problems were increased by 80% (libido loss), 82% (difficult sex arousal) and 69% (vaginal dryness) compared with TCRE. CONCLUSIONS: Five years after hysterectomy more women reported having bothersome psychosexual function than did the women who had a less invasive operation. Hormone therapy, although related to surgical method, did not reduce this long-term detrimental effect. The odds were particularly high amongst women with concurrent BO. Women should be advised that they might be at higher risk of psychosexual problems following hysterectomy, compared with a less invasive procedure.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Does the North Staffordshire slot system control demand of orthopaedic referrals from primary care?: A population-based survey in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Attempts to manage general practice demand for orthopaedic outpatient consultations have been made in several areas of the NHS, with little robust evidence on whether or not they work. AIM: To evaluate the effect of the North Staffordshire 'orthopaedic slot system' on the demand for general practice referrals to orthopaedic outpatients. METHOD: A prospective study of 12 general practices in the slot system, 24 controls, and the 63 other general practices in North Staffordshire. Comparison periods were the baseline year (0); the first calendar year (1); and the first half of the second calendar year (2). A multifactor linear regression model was used. RESULTS: Mean referral rate decreased 22% in the slot group in period 1, and was maintained in period 2 (9.40, 7.29, 7.31 referrals per 10,000 population per month for periods 0, 1 and 2, respectively). The control and other groups showed a small decrease in period 1, but in period 2 higher referral rates were observed. The reduction in referrals of 20-40% in participating practices compared to other practices equates to 2-4 referrals per 10,000 patients per month. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that practices willing and able to take up an offer of a slot system for managing their orthopaedic referrals will be able to significantly reduce referral rates for their patients when compared to similar practices who do not. Further research on the generalisability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of such systems is warranted.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in the abdominal trial, and laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy in the vaginal trial. DESIGN: Two parallel, multicentre, randomised trials. SETTING: 28 UK centres and two South African centres. PARTICIPANTS: 1380 women were recruited; 1346 had surgery; 937 were followed up at one year. Primary outcome Rate of major complications. RESULTS: In the abdominal trial laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher rate of major complications than abdominal hysterectomy (11.1% v 6.2%, P = 0.02; difference 4.9%, 95% confidence interval 0.9% to 9.1%) and the number needed to treat to harm was 20. Laparoscopic hysterectomy also took longer to perform (84 minutes v 50 minutes) but was less painful (visual analogue scale 3.51 v 3.88, P = 0.01) and resulted in a shorter stay in hospital after the operation (3 days v 4 days). Six weeks after the operation, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with less pain and better quality of life than abdominal hysterectomy (SF-12, body image scale, and sexual activity questionnaires). In the vaginal trial we found no evidence of a difference in major complication rates between laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy (9.8% v 9.5%, P = 0.92; difference 0.3%, -5.2% to 5.8%), and the number needed to treat to harm was 333. We found no evidence of other differences between laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy except that laparoscopic hysterectomy took longer to perform (72 minutes v 39 minutes) and was associated with a higher rate of detecting unexpected pathology (16.4% v 4.8%, P = < 0.01). However, this trial was underpowered. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a significantly higher rate of major complications than abdominal hysterectomy. It also took longer to perform but was associated with less pain, quicker recovery, and better short term quality of life. The trial comparing vaginal hysterectomy with laparoscopic hysterectomy was underpowered and is inconclusive on the rate of major complications; however, vaginal hysterectomy took less time.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Practical aspects of randomization and blinding in randomized clinical trials.

Randomization and blinding are important tools in determining the effectiveness of a new intervention and ensuring the validity of a clinical trial. However, randomness and haphazardness are not equivalent. Randomization cannot overcome poor experimental design or technique. Several types of randomization including historical controls and pseudorandomization are discussed, as well as methods of treatment allocation, stratification, and minimization techniques. The importance of decreasing bias and the advantages and disadvantages of blinding in randomized clinical trials are also covered.

Bias↗