PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stephen C Weber

Publications and source records attributed to Stephen C Weber.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Pain scores in the management of postoperative pain in shoulder surgery.

PURPOSE: Recent public opinion has focused on the lay perception that postoperative pain control is inadequate. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has attempted to address this issue by mandating patient-reported numeric pain scores as part of postoperative pain assessment. No studies exist to validate these scores in orthopaedics. The purpose of this study was 3-fold: (1) to determine which preoperative variables were associated with elevated postoperative pain scores, (2) to identify whether pain scores correlated with more traditional signs and symptoms of pain, and (3) to identify whether patients with a high pain score (HPS) affect perioperative and postoperative complication rates. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 105 patients who underwent routine arthroscopic rotator cuff repair over a 12-month period. Correlations and linear regression analysis were used to assess factors associated with postoperative pain scores. Logistic regression analysis was used to construct a model of preoperative, demographic, surgical, and postoperative variables associated with HPSs. RESULTS: Wide variability existed in pain scores despite the similarity of the surgical stimulus. What subtle differences that were present in the surgical procedures had no bearing on pain scores. No correlation existed between pain scores and any physiologic correlate of pain. Pain scores were correlated with Workers' Compensation insurance, preoperative antianxiety medications, antidepressant medications, preoperative narcotics, and alcohol use. HPS patients had a longer recovery room stay (P < .05) and a higher incidence of postoperative nausea than those with a normal pain tolerance. HPS patients also had a significantly delayed return to work, as well as significantly lower Simple Shoulder Test scores at 6 weeks, although the final shoulder scores were similar to those in patients with a normal pain tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported pain scores have been mandated, but they vary widely among patients undergoing virtually the same procedure and correlate poorly with physiologic manifestations of pain. Pain scores tend to correlate with other types of variables, most of which would be expected by the experienced surgeon. The exclusive use of pain scores in postoperative pain management should be limited to prevent complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic case series.

Aged↗

Complications associated with arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

We review the literature on complication of arthroscopic shoulder surgery and their management. Computer data based searches were used to identify articles regarding complications of shoulder arthroscopy, as well as hand searches of Arthroscopy and Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery over the last decade. Arthroscopic shoulder surgery has become a popular therapeutic and diagnostic procedure during the past two decades. As with all interventions complications can occur which require recognition and management by the orthopedic surgeon. While the literature is helpful with identifying types of complications, establishing the rate of these complications remains elusive. These complications can be divided into general complications, complications generic to all shoulder procedures, and complications specific to the type of procedure performed. General complications such as infection and anesthesia problems continue to show low incidences. Shoulder arthroscopy presents increased risk of complications over knee arthroscopy in regard to vascular and neurologic injury, fluid extravasation, stiffness, iatrogenic tendon injury, and equipment failure. New techniques of increased complexity for subacromial surgery, rotator cuff repair, and arthroscopic instability present new problems related to implant failure, nerve injury, iatrogenic fracture, and capsular necrosis. While the rate of complications especially with newer procedures remain elusive, most studies suggest that the rate is low, 5.8-9.5% in all recent review studies published. Underreporting complications makes assessment of incidence rates of complication difficult. Proper patient selection, attention to operative detail, and careful post-operative monitoring can minimize the morbidity associated with these complications.

Arthroscopy↗

Scalene regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery in a community setting: an assessment of risk.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective review of shoulder procedures using scalene block anesthesia was performed. METHODS: The records of all 218 patients who had undergone scalene block anesthesia over a three-year period at two facilities were retrospectively reviewed. All blocks were performed with use of a standard blunt-needle technique with the patient awake and with use of preoperative nerve stimulation to localize the brachial plexus. RESULTS: Adjunctive general anesthesia was used for 179 (82%) of the 218 patients. Seventy-two patients (33%) required intravenous pain medication immediately on arrival in the recovery room, and twenty-eight blocks (13%) failed. One grand mal seizure, one episode of cardiovascular collapse, and four episodes of severe respiratory distress were noted. Two patients had temporary neurologic injuries that persisted at six weeks. The mean duration of the block was 9 +/- 4.6 hours. Two hundred (92%) of the 218 patients required parenteral narcotics despite the use of scalene block anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Informed consent discussions regarding scalene block anesthesia should include information on the prevalence of complications and the efficacy of the technique.

Adult↗