Pharmacological profile and clinical characteristics of frovatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine: introduction.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Stephen D Silberstein.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A), a neurotoxin, is effective for treating a variety of disorders of involuntary muscle contraction, including cervical dystonia, blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm. It inhibits neurouscular signaling by blocking the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. The biological effects of the toxin are transient with normal neuronal signaling returning within approximately 3-6 months post injection. Recently, clinical findings suggest that BoNT/A may inhibit pain associated with migraine and other headache types. The mechanism by which this toxin inhibits pain is under investigation, recent findings suggest that it inhibits the release of neurotransmitters from nociceptive nerve terminals and in this way may exert an analgesic effect. A number of retrospective open-label chart reviews and three placebo-controlled double-blind trials have demonstrated that localized injections of BTX-A significantly reduce migraine frequency, severity, and migraine-associated disability. The majority of patients in these studies experienced no BoNT/A mediated side effects; however, a small percentage of patients did report transient minor side effects including blepharoptosis, dipolpia, and injection-site weakness. Currently there are several large-scale randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials in progress evaluating the efficacy, optimal dosing and side effect profile of this toxin as a novel treatment for migraine and other headache types. These studies may provide further evidence that BoNT/A is an effective option for the preventive treatment of migraine.
Headache is a common symptom caused by a wide variety of diseases. Primary headaches include migraine, cluster headache, tension-type headache, and other less common diseases. It is important to differentiate these headaches from secondary headaches caused by vascular, neoplastic, infectious, metabolic, or toxic disorders. Most primary headaches have a genetic basis, with environmental factors acting as triggers. Recent advances in basic research resulted in the development of more specific and effective therapies. Medication-overuse headache is a very common cause of chronic daily headache. Detoxification from the offending drug is essential for headache improvement. Cervicogenic headache is common and needs to be diagnosed correctly since it may require specific therapy. Nerve blocks are useful for some patients with primary, as well as secondary, headaches.
We analyzed the results of treating patients who had chronic daily headaches that were refractory to standard medications with repetitive low-dose boluses of intravenous propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol). Patients were treated over a 1-year period at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. A total of 18 patients were treated a total of 21 times. Over 90% of patients had at least some headache relief after treatment. The headache cycle was broken in eight patients. There were no complications. Intravenous propofol is safe and effective when used under monitored conditions and should be considered for patients who have refractory chronic daily headache and have failed other interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability and validity of the Migraine Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (MTAQ). DESIGN/METHODS: Eligible patients between ages 18 and 65 with at least one migraine per month, a physician visit in the preceding 6 months, and a migraine diagnosis were recruited from physician offices in the Philadelphia area. Participants completed the MTAQ, Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Migraine Disability Assessment Score (MIDAS), the Beck Depression Inventory, a demographic questionnaire, and a medication use survey. The first 100 participants completed a second MTAQ approximately 2 weeks later. The test-retest reliability, construct, and predictive validity of the MTAQ were assessed. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one patients were recruited; 243 patients were assessable. All MTAQ questions had a kappa statistic of.5 or higher and an agreement of at least 76%. There was a significant level of agreement (.71) for the MTAQ summary score. MTAQ items regarding control, frequency, work loss, resource use, and satisfaction were associated with significant differences in SF-36 scores. MTAQ items related to work loss, emergency department use, headache frequency, and control were associated with days missed from work and degree of disability as measured by MIDAS. Suboptimal migraine management was significantly associated with MTAQ items indicating three or more headaches per month, missing time from work or school, taking daily medication for headaches, and having an emergency department visit in the last 6 months. CONCLUSION: MTAQ is a reliable and valid questionnaire to identify migraineurs whose migraine management may be suboptimal in a primary care setting.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Migraine is a common, chronic, incapacitating, neurovascular disorder that affects an estimated 12% of the population. Understanding the basic mechanisms of pain is important when treating patients with chronic pain disorders. Pain, an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience, is usually triggered by stimulation of peripheral nerves and often associated with actual or potential tissue damage. Peripheral nerve fibers transmit pain signals from the periphery toward the spinal cord or brain stem. The different diameter pain fibers (A and C) vary in the speed of conduction and the type of pain transmitted (eg, sharp versus dull). When stimulated, peripheral pain fibers carrying sensory input from the body enter at different layers of the dorsal horn, which is then propagated toward the thalamus via the spinothalamic tract within the spinal cord. Conversely, sensory input from the face does not enter the spinal cord but enters the brain stem via the trigeminal nerve. This review describes in detail the neurobiological mechanisms and pathways for pain sensation, with a focus on migraine pain.
Ten patients with migraine with prolonged aura were studied for the presence of mitochondrial DNA point mutations utilizing DNA isolated from blood and hair samples. We analyzed for nine point mutations reported in patients with MELAS (A3243G, C3256T, T3271C, T3291C, A5814G, T8356C, T9957C, G13513A, and A13514G) and three secondary LHON mutations (T4216C, A4917G, and G13708A). None of the patients tested had any of these mutations in mitochondrial DNA. However, one patient was found to have a tRNA(Gln) A4336G mitochondrial DNA variant. From this study it appears that migraine with prolonged aura is not an oligosymptomatic form of MELAS and is not related to secondary LHON mutations. The significance of the tRNA A4336G variant is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To compare tramadol/acetaminophen (APAP) and placebo for the management of acute migraine pain. BACKGROUND: Tramadol/APAP tablets reduced moderate-to-moderately severe acute pain in controlled studies of other painful conditions. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study enrolled adults with migraine pain as per International Headache Society criteria. Subjects took tramadol/APAP (total dose, 75 mg/650 mg) or placebo for a typical migraine with moderate-to-severe pain. Severity of pain and migraine-related symptoms were recorded before study medication and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours after study medication. RESULTS: Efficacy analyses included 305 subjects (154 tramadol/APAP and 151 placebo). Treatment response was higher for tramadol/APAP than a placebo at 2 hours after dosing (55.8% vs. 33.8%, P < .001) and at every other assessment from 30 minutes (12.3% vs. 6.6%) through 6 hours (64.9% vs. 37.7%) (all P< or = .022). Subjects in the tramadol/APAP group were more likely than those in the placebo group to be pain-free at 2 hours (22.1% vs. 9.3%), 6 hours (42.9% vs. 25.2%), and 24 hours (52.7% vs. 37.9%) (all P< or = .007). Two hours after dosing, moderate-to-severe symptoms that were less common for tramadol/APAP than placebo included photophobia (34.6% vs. 52.2%, P= .003) and phonophobia (34.3% vs. 44.9%, P = .008), but not migraine-related nausea (38.5% vs. 29.4%, P= .681). Treatment-related adverse events included nausea, dizziness, vomiting, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: Tramadol/APAP reduces the severity of pain, photophobia, and phonophobia associated with migraine headache, but does not reduce migraine-associated nausea. Tramadol/APAP might be an appropriate option for the management of moderate-to-severe migraine headache.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.