PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stephen D Wiviott

Publications and source records attributed to Stephen D Wiviott.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

A polygenic risk score for peripheral artery disease and major adverse limb events.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Large-scale genome-wide association studies have identified common genetic variants that predict the risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD). This study assessed whether a polygenic risk score (PRS) is associated with PAD and the incidence of major adverse limb events (MALE) independent of clinical risk factors in patients with established cardiometabolic disease. METHODS: A genetic analysis was performed, pooling individual patient-level data from six TIMI trials. The association of a recently validated PAD PRS with prevalent PAD and the incidence of MALE (acute limb ischaemia, chronic limb-threatening ischaemia, major amputation, or peripheral revascularization) was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 68 816 patients were included in this analysis, with a median follow-up of 2.6 years. Of these, 5986 (8.7%) had known PAD at baseline. After adjusting for clinical risk factors, a higher PAD PRS was independently associated with a 15% greater odds of prevalent PAD (adjusted odds ratio per 1-SD: 1.15 [95% confidence interval 1.12-1.18], P < .0001), a magnitude of risk as strong as established clinical risk factors. A total of 577 patients experienced MALE during follow-up. A higher PAD PRS was associated with a 30% increased risk of MALE (adjusted hazard ratio per 1-SD: 1.30 [1.19-1.42], P < .0001). Adding the PAD PRS to clinical risk factors resulted in a statistically significant but modest improvement in discrimination (area under the curve went from 0.651 to 0.662 P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a broad spectrum of patients with cardiometabolic disease, the PAD PRS is associated with an increased risk of PAD and the incidence of MALE beyond clinical risk factors; however, the improvement in discrimination was statistically significant but clinically modest.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Identification of plasma proteomic markers underlying polygenic risk of type 2 diabetes and related comorbidities.

Genomics can provide insight into the etiology of type 2 diabetes and its comorbidities, but assigning functionality to non-coding variants remains challenging. Polygenic scores, which aggregate variant effects, can uncover mechanisms when paired with molecular data. Here, we test polygenic scores for type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic comorbidities for associations with 2,922 circulating proteins in the UK Biobank. The genome-wide type 2 diabetes polygenic score associates with 617 proteins, of which 75% also associate with another cardiometabolic score. Partitioned type 2 diabetes scores, which capture distinct disease biology, associate with 342 proteins (20% unique). In this work, we identify key pathways (e.g., complement cascade), potential therapeutic targets (e.g., FAM3D in type 2 diabetes), and biomarkers of diabetic comorbidities (e.g., EFEMP1 and IGFBP2) through causal inference, pathway enrichment, and Cox regression of clinical trial outcomes. Our results are available via an interactive portal ( https://public.cgr.astrazeneca.com/t2d-pgs/v1/ ).

Humans↗
PubMed2007

A comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel loading doses on platelet function: magnitude of platelet inhibition is related to active metabolite formation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare rate of onset, magnitude, and consistency of platelet inhibition after administration of prasugrel or clopidogrel and to relate platelet inhibition to systemic exposure to each active metabolite. Thienopyridines are prodrugs, metabolized in vivo to active metabolites that inhibit the platelet P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor. METHODS: This was an open-label, 2-way, crossover study that randomized healthy subjects (n = 68) to an oral loading dose (LD) of prasugrel 60 mg or clopidogrel 300 mg. Platelet aggregation response to 5 and 20 micromol/L of ADP was measured by turbidometric aggregometry. Plasma concentrations of the active metabolites of prasugrel and clopidogrel were quantified by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection methods. RESULTS: Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) after prasugrel was significantly higher (P < .01) than that after clopidogrel from 15 minutes through 24 hours (5 micromol/L ADP) and from 30 minutes through 24 hours (20 micromol/L ADP). For 20 micromol/L ADP, the median time to reach > or = 20% IPA was 30 minutes for prasugrel and 1.5 hours for clopidogrel (P < .001). The maximum IPA was 84.1% +/- 9.5% with prasugrel versus 48.9% +/- 27.0% with clopidogrel for 5 micromol/L ADP and 78.8% +/- 9.2% versus 35.0% +/- 24.5%, respectively, for 20 micromol/L ADP (P < .001). Response to prasugrel was more consistent compared to clopidogrel (P < .01). The lower IPA response to clopidogrel was associated with lower plasma concentrations of its active metabolite (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Prasugrel 60 mg LD results in more rapid, potent, and consistent inhibition of platelet function than clopidogrel 300 mg LD. Lower IPA responses to clopidogrel were associated with lower concentrations of its active metabolite.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Clopidogrel response variability, resistance, or both?

Dual antiplatelet therapy represents an important advance for patients with established cardiovascular disease. Variable platelet response and potential resistance to therapy have emerged with aspirin and clopidogrel. There is no clear and accepted definition of clopidogrel resistance, but patients with lower responses to clopidogrel are at risk for ischemic events, particularly when they undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. Inconsistent nomenclature about this lower response has led to confusion about its potential clinical importance. The concern about nomenclature is less important than answers to key questions such as its mechanisms, how and in whom to measure platelet function, what levels of inhibition are associated with failure of therapy, what levels are adequate for improved clinical outcomes, and in what ways therapy could be altered in patients with lower responses to improve measures of platelet function and clinical outcomes. One option may be to target more aggressive intervention (higher loading and maintenance doses of clopidogrel or alternative agents) to specific patients who are at greater risk and/or least responsive to standard therapies. Clinically useful risk stratification requires an easily performed and reproducible measure of platelet aggregation, as well as standardized definitions of response that correlate with clinical outcomes. Point-of-care assays of platelet function may ultimately improve the ability of clinicians to modify therapy on the basis of response.

Aspirin↗
PubMed2006

Benefits of achieving the NCEP optional LDL-C goal among elderly patients with ACS.

AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of the achievement of the NCEP goal of LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L in elderly patients with ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS: The relationship between LDL-C at 30 days after ACS and subsequent clinical outcomes were compared among elderly patients (aged > or =70 years) vs. younger counterparts in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial, using the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina. Among 634 elderly patients, the achievement of the NCEP goal was associated with an 8% absolute and a 40% relative lower risk of events [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.87, P = 0.008] vs. corresponding benefits of 2.3 and 26% in 3150 younger patients (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.94, P = 0.013). The estimated number of events preventable among the elderly by the achievement of these goals was 80 events at 2 years for every 1000 patients at goal vs. those not at goal, compared with 23 events potentially prevented in younger patients. The incidence of major side effects among the elderly was similar to that in younger patients and did not differ with the intensity of the statin regimen. CONCLUSION: Among elderly ACS patients, achieving the new NCEP LDL-C optional goal as part of a secondary prevention strategy can be both as safe and effective as in younger patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III algorithm for selecting candidates for statin therapy: insights from the A to Z trial.

The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III recommends an algorithm to integrate iterative risk-stratification information with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels to identify candidates for statin therapy. We used the Aggrastat to Zocor (A to Z) trial, in which all patients presented with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event in the absence of previous statin therapy, to evaluate the performance of this algorithm. Of 1,750 patients with ACS included in this analysis, 1,126 (64%) had an indication for statin therapy before enrollment and 624 (36%) did not have a statin indication before enrollment. We estimate that initiating statin therapy at moderate dosages (decreasing LDL by 1 mmol/L) according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines would have prevented approximately 15% of the ACS events leading to enrollment in the A to Z trial, whereas more intensive statin therapy (decreasing LDL by 1.5 mmol/L) would have prevented >21% of events. Aspirin use before enrollment was reported in only 38% of subjects with a statin indication. In conclusion, these observations represent missed opportunities for primary and secondary prevention and highlight the need for assessment of patient risk and better adherence to existing prevention guidelines.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Clinical relevance of C-reactive protein during follow-up of patients with acute coronary syndromes in the Aggrastat-to-Zocor Trial.

BACKGROUND: Elevated levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) are associated with higher risk of adverse outcomes in patients at risk for or with established coronary artery disease. Retrospective analyses suggest that this risk may be modified with statin therapy. However, a role for hsCRP in monitoring the success of therapy remains uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured the serum concentration of hsCRP at 30 days (n=3813) and 4 months in patients with non-ST-elevation or ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome randomly assigned to an early intensive versus delayed conservative simvastatin strategy in the Aggrastat-to-Zocor Trial. Patients with hsCRP >3 mg/L at 30 days had significantly higher 2-year mortality rates than those with hsCRP 1 to 3 mg/L or hsCRP <1 mg/L (6.1% versus 3.7% versus 1.6%, P<0.0001). Results were similar with hsCRP measured at 4 months. After adjusting for age, gender, diabetes, smoking, cardiovascular history, index event, lipid levels, and randomly assigned treatment, patients with hsCRP >3 mg/L were at more than 3-fold higher risk of death (HR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.9 to 7.2) compared with those with hsCRP <1 mg/L. "Average" levels of hsCRP (1 to 3 mg/L) were also associated with increased risk compared with those with hsCRP <1 mg/L (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.6). Patients allocated to early intensive statin therapy were more likely to achieve hsCRP levels <1 mg/L at 30 days (P=0.028) and 4 months (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Achieved levels of hsCRP at 30 days and 4 months after acute coronary syndrome are independently associated with long-term survival. Patients treated with more aggressive statin therapy are more likely to achieve lower levels of hsCRP.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

The role of clopidogrel in early and sustained arterial patency after fibrinolysis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the ECG CLARITY-TIMI 28 Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the relationship between clopidogrel and early ST-segment resolution (STRes) and the interaction of the two with clinical outcomes after fibrinolysis. BACKGROUND: ST-segment resolution is an early noninvasive marker of coronary reperfusion. METHODS: The CLARITY-TIMI 28 (Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Reperfusion Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 28) trial randomized 3,491 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing fibrinolysis to clopidogrel versus placebo. ST-segment resolution was defined as complete (>70%), partial (30% to 70%), or none (<30%). RESULTS: Electrocardiograms were valid for interpretation in 2,431 patients at 90 min and 2,087 at 180 min. There was no difference in the rate of complete STRes between the clopidogrel and placebo groups at 90 min (38.4% vs. 36.6% at 90 min). When patients were stratified by STRes category, treatment with clopidogrel resulted in greater benefit among those with evidence of early STRes, with greater odds of an open artery at late angiography in patients with partial (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, p = 0.04) or complete (OR 2.0, p < 0.001) STRes, but no improvement in those with no STRes at 90 min (OR 0.89, p = 0.48) (p for interaction = 0.003). Clopidogrel was also associated with a significant reduction in the odds of an in-hospital death or myocardial infarction in patients who achieved partial (OR 0.30, p = 0.003) or complete STRes at 90 min (OR 0.49, p = 0.056), whereas clinical benefit was not apparent in patients who had no STRes (OR 0.98, p = 0.95) (p for interaction = 0.027). By 30 days, the clinical benefit of clopidogrel was predominately seen in patients with complete STRes. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel appears to improve late coronary patency and clinical outcomes by preventing reocclusion of open arteries rather than by facilitating early reperfusion.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Application of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk index in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: evaluation of patients in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk index (TRI) to characterize the risk of death among patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). BACKGROUND: The TRI, calculated from baseline age, systolic pressure, and heart rate, was established in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and is predictive of mortality. Patients presenting with NSTEMI are increasing compared to STEMI and constitute a group with varied risk. METHODS: The TRI was calculated in 337,192 patients from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction with NSTEMI. Values and outcomes were compared with 153,486 patients with STEMI classified by reperfusion status. Comparisons of baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes stratified by TRI were made. RESULTS: There was a graded relationship between the TRI and mortality in patients with NSTEMI with a >30-fold difference in mortality rates between lowest and highest deciles (p < 0.0001). The index showed good discrimination (c = 0.73). Overall mortality in the group with NSTEMI was higher (10.9%) than patients with STEMI treated with (6.6%) but lower than for STEMI patients not receiving reperfusion therapy (18.7%). The higher risk in comparison to patients with STEMI treated with reperfusion therapy was explained largely by the higher-risk profile of the population with NSTEMI. CONCLUSIONS: There is a graded relationship between TRI and mortality in patients with NSTEMI. This simple risk index provides important information about mortality in patients across the spectrum of myocardial infarction, STEMI and NSTEMI. Early identification of NSTEMI patients who are at high risk of in-hospital mortality may provide clinicians with important information for initial triage and treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

A tale of two trials: a comparison of the post-acute coronary syndrome lipid-lowering trials A to Z and PROVE IT-TIMI 22.

BACKGROUND: The Aggrastat to Zocor (A to Z) and Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT) trials compared intensive and moderate statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes, with seemingly disparate results. We analyzed the design, implementation, and results of the two trials in an attempt to clarify the effects of early intensive statin therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Study design, end points, and definitions were compared. In each trial, comparisons were made between intensive and moderate arms for both trials' primary end points and death/myocardial infarction. Analyses were performed over various time points: at the end of the trials, < or =4 months, and >4 months. Subjects in A to Z had higher-risk demographics. More PROVE IT subjects were enrolled in the United States and underwent prerandomization revascularization. The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) difference was greater in A to Z than in PROVE IT early (< or =4 months) but less late. Significant C-reactive protein reduction was earlier in PROVE IT. With common end points, event rates were higher in A to Z, and early favorable separation of event curves was seen in PROVE IT but not in A to Z. Clinical end point rates and reductions were similar in both trials after 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: An early benefit was seen in PROVE IT but not in A to Z. Late-phase results were similar. Factors that may explain this disparity include the intensity of therapy in the early phase, timing, and magnitude of LDL and C-reactive protein lowering, differences in early revascularization, and the play of chance. Taken together, the results of these trials support a strategy of early intensive statin therapy coupled with revascularization when appropriate in patients after acute coronary syndrome.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: design and rationale for the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38).

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is standard for prevention of thrombotic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Prasugrel is a thienopyridine that is more potent, more rapid in onset, and more consistent in inhibition of platelets than clopidogrel. TRITON-TIMI 38 is designed to compare prasugrel with clopidogrel in moderate to high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). STUDY DESIGN: TRITON-TIMI 38 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multinational, clinical trial. Approximately 13,000 patients with moderate to high-risk ACS undergoing PCI (9500 unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [MI], 3500 ST-segment elevation MI) will be randomized to prasugrel 60 mg loading dose followed by 10 mg daily or clopidogrel 300 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg daily for up to 15 months. The primary end point is the time of the first event of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke. Analyses will be performed first in the unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation MI cohort and, conditionally, on the whole ACS population. Major safety end points include TIMI major and minor bleeding unrelated to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. CONCLUSIONS: TRITON-TIMI 38 is a phase 3 comparison of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with moderate to high-risk ACS undergoing PCI. In addition, it is the first large-scale clinical events trial to assess whether a thienopyridine regimen that achieves a higher level of inhibition of platelet aggregation than the standard therapy results in an improvement in clinical outcomes.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Update on lipid-lowering therapy and LDL-cholesterol targets.

Serum cholesterol has long been recognized as an important risk factor for the development and progression of atherosclerotic vascular disease. For more than 30 years, improved outcomes with lipid lowering have been demonstrated. As a result of these data, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) convened the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel I (NCEP ATP I). This panel and similar ones around the world have served to set the standards for lipid lowering in clinical practice. Subsequent revisions of these standards (NCEP ATP II and III) have led to greater focus being placed on LDL, and targets for lowering LDL levels being based on patients' risk of subsequent coronary disease events. Since the publication of the NCEP ATP III guidelines, several large-scale clinical trials of cholesterol lowering have been conducted, the findings of which have the potential to impact on clinical practice standards. In this article we focus on current guidelines for lipid-lowering therapy, review the results and implications of important completed clinical trials, and consider the utility of additional targets for preventive therapy, such as C-reactive protein and HDL. We also consider the prospects for treatments in development and future goals.

C-Reactive Protein↗
PubMed2006

The safety and efficacy of achieving very low LDL-cholesterol concentrations with high dose statin therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The benefits of lipid lowering with statins are established in patients with or at risk for coronary artery disease. Recent trials with high doses of potent statins have examined treating to very low levels of LDL-cholesterol. Concerns have been raised about the safety of this strategy. This review examines the safety and efficacy of treating to very low LDL-cholesterol. RECENT FINDINGS: Four clinical trials, Treating to New Targets (TNT) and Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) in stable coronary artery disease and Aggrastat to Zocor (A to Z) and Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT)-TIMI 22 following acute coronary syndromes, have examined intensive statin therapy compared to moderate statin therapy. These trials and a meta-analysis demonstrated that intensive statin therapy reduces cardiovascular events. Subsequent analyses from these trials suggest that very low levels of LDL-cholesterol can be achieved safely and may improve clinical outcomes. A note of caution regarding hemorrhagic events following stroke with intensive statin therapy was raised by the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction of Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial despite impressive reductions in cardiovascular events. SUMMARY: A growing body of evidence suggests progressive benefit for lowering LDL-cholesterol aggressively with intensive statin therapy in coronary artery disease. Future trials will be needed to define whether there is a level of LDL-cholesterol beyond which further benefit is not seen or safety concerns emerge.

Cholesterol, LDL↗
PubMed2006

Clinical applications of antiplatelet therapy.

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine has become the standard of care for patients undergoing percutaneous intervention with stenting, regardless of indication. This article will examine the evidence for and against the use of aspirin and thienopyridines, with emphasis on platelet resistance and nonresponsiveness. Data suggest that in some patients, clopidogrel plus aspirin is not superior to aspirin alone. Resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel has been reported. Patients exhibiting aspirin resistance, as measured by an elevated platelet aggregate ratio, have a 10-fold increase in the risk of recurrent vascular events as compared to aspirin-sensitive patients. Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness has been a consistently observed phenomenon in studies utilizing various P2Y12 receptor-specific assays. Nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel treatment has been suggested as a risk factor for the occurrence of ischemic events and stent thrombosis.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2006

Therapeutic goals for effective platelet inhibition: a consensus document.

Clopidogrel combined with aspirin is the mainstay of antiplatelet therapy for patients who present with acute coronary syndromes as well as following either bare metal or drug-eluting stent placement. Limitations of clopidogrel therapy include the relatively long time course required to achieve maximal inhibition of platelet aggregation, individual variability in response to its effect, the risk of bleeding during its administration, and the irreversible nature of P2Y12 receptor binding, which leads to a prolonged time course for recovery of platelet function following discontinuation of clopidogrel. Several investigational P2Y12 receptor antagonists have pharmacological properties that may overcome some or all of these limitations. These novel agents such as prasugrel, AZD6140, and cangrelor are in advanced stages of clinical development for potential use in patients with coronary artery disease.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗
PubMed2005

Can low-density lipoprotein be too low? The safety and efficacy of achieving very low low-density lipoprotein with intensive statin therapy: a PROVE IT-TIMI 22 substudy.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of achieving very low calculated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels with intensive statin therapy. BACKGROUND: Intensive statin therapy reduces clinical events occurring after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and may result in LDL levels markedly lower than guideline levels. Prior epidemiologic and preclinical studies raise concerns about the safety of very low cholesterol levels. METHODS: The Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) study compared intensive therapy (atorvastatin, 80 mg) and moderate therapy (pravastatin, 40 mg) in patients after ACS. Patients treated with atorvastatin were divided by four-month LDL values into groups: >100, >80 to 100 (reference-range-meeting guidelines), >60 to 80, >40 to 60, and <40 mg/dl. Baseline, clinical, and safety data were compared among groups achieving guideline recommendation levels or lower. RESULTS: Among 1,825 patients with four-month LDL, 91% were at goal (<100 mg/dl). The distribution was >80 to 100 mg/dl (14%), >60 to 80 mg/dl (31%), >40 to 60 mg/dl (34%), and <40 mg/dl (11%). Those with lower LDL levels were more often male, older, and diabetic, and had lower baseline LDL levels. They had prior statin therapy and fewer prior myocardial infarctions (MI). There were no significant differences in safety parameters, including muscle, liver, or retinal abnormalities, intracranial hemorrhage, or death, in the very low LDL groups. The <40 mg/dl and 40 to 60 mg/dl groups had fewer major cardiac events (death, MI, stroke, recurrent ischemia, revascularization). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients treated with an accepted LDL goal (80 to 100 mg/dl), there was no adverse effect on safety with lower achieved LDL levels, and apparent improved clinical efficacy. These data identify no intrinsic safety concern of achieving low LDL and, therefore, a strategy of intensive treatment need not be altered in patients achieving very low LDL levels.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Randomized comparison of prasugrel (CS-747, LY640315), a novel thienopyridine P2Y12 antagonist, with clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Joint Utilization of Medications to Block Platelets Optimally (JUMBO)-TIMI 26 trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the current standard antiplatelet regimen of aspirin and clopidogrel (with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors) in percutaneous coronary intervention patients, periprocedural and postprocedural ischemic events continue to occur. Prasugrel (CS-747, LY640315), a novel potent thienopyridine P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, has the potential to achieve higher levels of inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation than currently approved doses of clopidogrel. METHODS AND RESULTS: Joint Utilization of Medications to Block Platelets Optimally-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 26 (JUMBO-TIMI 26) was a phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging, double-blind safety trial of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in 904 patients undergoing elective or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were randomized to either standard dosing with clopidogrel or 1 of 3 prasugrel regimens. Subjects were monitored for 30 days for bleeding and clinical events. The primary end point of the trial was clinically significant (TIMI major plus minor) non-CABG-related bleeding events in prasugrel- versus clopidogrel-treated patients. Hemorrhagic complications were infrequent, with no significant difference between patients treated with prasugrel or clopidogrel in the rate of significant bleeding (1.7% versus 1.2%; hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.40, 5.08). In prasugrel-treated patients, there were numerically lower incidences of the primary efficacy composite end point (30-day major adverse cardiac events) and of the secondary end points myocardial infarction, recurrent ischemia, and clinical target vessel thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 2 study, which was designed to assess safety when administered at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention, prasugrel and clopidogrel both resulted in low rates of bleeding. The results of this trial serve as a foundation for the large phase 3 clinical trial designed to assess both efficacy and safety.

Adolescent↗