PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stephen E Kimmel

Publications and source records attributed to Stephen E Kimmel.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Comparison of cool tip versus 8-mm tip catheter in achieving electrical isolation of pulmonary veins for long-term control of atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare safety and efficacy of 8-mm versus cooled tip catheter in achieving electrical isolation (EI) of pulmonary veins (PV) for long-term control of atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: There is paucity of studies comparing safety/efficacy of 8-mm and cooled tip catheters in patients undergoing AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a randomized and patient-blinded study. Subjects were followed by clinic visits (at 6 weeks and 6 months) and transtelephonic monitoring (3-week duration) done around each visit. Primary endpoints were: (1) long-term AF control (complete freedom and/or >90% reduction in AF burden on or off antiarrhythmic drugs at 6 months after a single ablation), and (2) occurrence of serious adverse events (cardiac tamponade, stroke, LA-esophageal fistula, and/or death). Eighty-two patients (age 56 +/- 9 years, 60 males, paroxysmal AF = 59) were randomized (42 patients to 8-mm tip and 40 patients to cooled tip). EI of PVs was achieved in shorter time by the 8-mm tip as compared with cooled tip catheter (40 +/- 23 minutes vs 50 +/- 30 minutes; P < 0.05) but long-term AF control was not different between the two (32 patients [78%] vs 28 patients [70%], respectively; P = NS). One serious adverse event occurred in each group (LA-esophageal fistula and stroke, respectively) and no significant PV stenosis was observed in either. CONCLUSION: EI of PVs using either 8-mm or cooled tip catheter results in long-term AF control in the majority after a single ablation procedure, with comparable efficacy and safety.

Atrial Fibrillation↗
PubMed2006

The role of risk stratification in the decision to provide upstream versus selective glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We endeavored to determine under what conditions a strategy of upstream use of small molecule platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors for all acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients is cost effective compared to that of selective use of abciximab in only those patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have shown benefit in ACS, but abciximab, the more expensive GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, may be more effective during PCI. However, abciximab does not have proven efficacy in medical management. No prior study has attempted to balance these competing benefits. METHODS: A decision analysis was performed to examine two strategies: 1) treat all ACS patients upstream with a small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor and continue through medical management and PCI, if performed; or 2) wait, and selectively use abciximab only in patients who ultimately undergo PCI. Applicable randomized controlled trial data were used for the principal analysis. RESULTS: The strategy of upstream use of a small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was superior to selective use, and economically acceptable, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 18,000 dollars per year of life gained. The superiority of the upstream use strategy persisted over the majority of sensitivity analyses. When stratified by risk according to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score, a strategy of upstream use was only cost effective in those patients with moderate or high risk. CONCLUSIONS: Upstream use of small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in ACS patients with moderate or high risk for cardiovascular events is a cost-effective approach that should be considered in this subset of patients.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2006

Insulin sensitizing pharmacotherapy for prevention of myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance are associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI). Although differences exist in insulin sensitization among oral hypoglycemic drugs, it is unclear whether these differences translate into a differential risk of MI and whether differences exist among these drugs. We conducted a case-control study of first MI in a 5-county area during a 56-month period. The patients were those with type 2 diabetes mellitus hospitalized with a first MI and the controls were those with diabetes mellitus randomly selected from the same geographic area. Information on medication use and other clinical data were obtained by telephone interview. After adjustment for all confounders, the odds ratio for MI for current monotherapy with thiazolidinedione and monotherapy with metformin compared with monotherapy with sulfonylurea was 0.33 (95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.92, p = 0.03) and 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.27 to 0.82, p = 0.01), respectively. The addition of a thiazolidinedione, but not metformin, to sulfonylurea monotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in MI risk compared with sulfonylurea therapy alone. In conclusion, the use of insulin-sensitizing drugs is associated with a significantly reduced risk of MI compared with sulfonylurea use, and the addition of a thiazolidinedione to sulfonylurea monotherapy is associated with a lower risk of MI.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Predictors of recall of over-the-counter and prescription non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug exposure.

PURPOSE: Because of the difficulty in establishing a gold standard, data on accuracy of recall of over-the-counter (OTC) medication use are sparse. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 1889 persons living in the Philadelphia area to assess recall of non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NANSAID) use during the preceding 8 weeks. Our analyses were based on the assumption that among the group of subjects, on average, the reported usage of NANSAIDs should not vary over the previous 8 weeks. To model the effect of time on reported usage while allowing for the inherent correlation of responses within subjects over time, we employed alternating logistic regression. RESULTS: We documented a significant decline in reported use of OTC NANSAIDs but not prescription NANSAIDs during the 8-week study period (p = 0.3 for frequent prescription NANSAIDs, p = 0.2 for infrequent prescription NANSAIDs, p < 0.001 for frequent OTC NANSAIDs, and p < 0.001 for infrequent OTC NANSAIDs). Reported rates of frequent and infrequent OTC NANSAID consumption declined from 6.3 to 4.6% and from 17.1 to 12.8% between the most recent week and eight weeks prior, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Interviews focusing on medications used on an as needed basis should be performed as close as possible to the index date. Likewise, data on frequent use of OTC NANSAIDs may be more reliable than that on infrequent use, particularly when subjects are asked to recall more than a few weeks back in time.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Can atorvastatin improve the response to sildenafil in men with erectile dysfunction not initially responsive to sildenafil? Hypothesis and pilot trial results.

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) may be one manifestation of a generalized vascular disorder characterized by endothelial dysfunction. Statin drugs may improve endothelial function, even before altering the lipid profile. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether the addition of a statin with sildenafil would improve ED in men who initially responded poorly to sildenafil. METHODS: Men with moderate-to-severe ED despite an adequate sildenafil trial were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. ED was defined using a validated self-administered questionnaire as a score of <or=16 on the International Index of Erectile Function (erectile function domain score range of 6-30). Improvement in ED score with sildenafil was reassessed at 6 and 12 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin (80 mg daily) or matching placebo. RESULTS: Twelve men (mean age 58 +/- 13 years) with a mean domain score of 8.2 +/- 6.9 and a mean duration of ED of 3.7 years were enrolled in the study. Treatment with atorvastatin decreased mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 43% and resulted in an improvement with sildenafil in domain score of 7.8 (P = 0.036); an effect was apparent by 6 weeks. The increase in domain score in placebo patients was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with atorvastatin improved sexual function and the response to oral sildenafil in men who did not initially respond to treatment with sildenafil. The results of this pilot study support the hypothesis that vascular endothelial dysfunction contributes to ED in sildenafil nonresponders and deserves further testing in a large clinical trial.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Effectiveness of a two-part educational intervention to improve hypertension control: a cluster-randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To measure the effectiveness of a multifaceted educational intervention to improve ambulatory hypertension control. DESIGN: Cluster-randomized trial. SETTING: Academic health system using an ambulatory electronic medical record. SUBJECTS: A total of 10,696 patients with a diagnosis of hypertension cared for by 93 primary care providers. INTERVENTION: Academic detailing, provision of provider-specific data about hypertension control, provision of educational materials to the provider, and provision of educational and motivational materials to patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was blood pressure control, defined as a blood pressure measurement below 140/90 mm Hg, and was ascertained from electronic medical records over 6 months of follow-up. We determined the adjusted odds ratio for the association between the intervention and the achievement of controlled blood pressure. When we accounted for clustering by provider, this adjusted odds ratio was 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.47). Adjusted odds ratios were 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.36) in patients whose blood pressure was controlled at baseline and 1.25 (95% confidence interval 0.94-1.65) in those whose blood pressure was not. These odds ratios were not significantly different (p=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: These results were consistent with no effect or, at best, a relatively modest effect of the intervention among patients with hypertension. Had we not included a concurrent control group, the data would have provided an unduly optimistic view of the effectiveness of the program. The effectiveness of future interventions may be improved by focusing on patients whose blood pressure is uncontrolled at baseline.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2005

The effect of primary graft dysfunction on survival after lung transplantation.

RATIONALE: Primary graft dysfunction is a severe acute lung injury syndrome after lung transplantation. Long-term outcomes of subjects with primary graft dysfunction have not been studied. OBJECTIVES: We sought to test the relationship of primary graft dysfunction with both short- and long-term mortality using a large registry. METHODS: We used data collected on 5,262 patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing/International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation registry between 1994 and 2000. We assessed outcomes in all subjects; to assess potential bias from the effects of early mortality, we also evaluated subjects who survived at least 1 year, using Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates. MAIN RESULTS: The overall incidence of primary graft dysfunction was 10.2% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 9.2, 10.9). The incidence did not vary by year over the period of observation (p = 0.22). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 42.1% for primary graft dysfunction versus 6.1% in patients without graft dysfunction (relative risk = 6.95; 95% CI, 5.98, 8.08; p < 0.001); among subjects who died by 30 days, 43.6% had primary graft dysfunction. Among patients surviving at least 1 year, those who had primary graft dysfunction had significantly worse survival over ensuing years (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.07, 1.70; p = 0.011). Adjustment for clinical variables including bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome did not change this relationship. CONCLUSION: Primary graft dysfunction contributes to nearly half of the short-term mortality after lung transplantation. Survivors of primary graft dysfunction have increased risk of death extending beyond the first post-transplant year.

Cause of Death↗
PubMed2005

Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors.

CONTEXT: Hospital computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems are widely regarded as the technical solution to medication ordering errors, the largest identified source of preventable hospital medical error. Published studies report that CPOE reduces medication errors up to 81%. Few researchers, however, have focused on the existence or types of medication errors facilitated by CPOE. OBJECTIVE: To identify and quantify the role of CPOE in facilitating prescription error risks. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a qualitative and quantitative study of house staff interaction with a CPOE system at a tertiary-care teaching hospital (2002-2004). We surveyed house staff (N = 261; 88% of CPOE users); conducted 5 focus groups and 32 intensive one-on-one interviews with house staff, information technology leaders, pharmacy leaders, attending physicians, and nurses; shadowed house staff and nurses; and observed them using CPOE. Participants included house staff, nurses, and hospital leaders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Examples of medication errors caused or exacerbated by the CPOE system. RESULTS: We found that a widely used CPOE system facilitated 22 types of medication error risks. Examples include fragmented CPOE displays that prevent a coherent view of patients' medications, pharmacy inventory displays mistaken for dosage guidelines, ignored antibiotic renewal notices placed on paper charts rather than in the CPOE system, separation of functions that facilitate double dosing and incompatible orders, and inflexible ordering formats generating wrong orders. Three quarters of the house staff reported observing each of these error risks, indicating that they occur weekly or more often. Use of multiple qualitative and survey methods identified and quantified error risks not previously considered, offering many opportunities for error reduction. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that a leading CPOE system often facilitated medication error risks, with many reported to occur frequently. As CPOE systems are implemented, clinicians and hospitals must attend to errors that these systems cause in addition to errors that they prevent.

Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems↗
PubMed2005

Patients exposed to rofecoxib and celecoxib have different odds of nonfatal myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Studies have postulated that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitors affect cardiovascular risk through various mechanisms. Some of these mechanisms could increase risk (for example, inhibition of prostacyclin production), and some could decrease risk (for example, inhibition of inflammation). OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of COX-2 inhibitors on risk for nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: 36 hospitals in a 5-county area. PARTICIPANTS: 1718 case-patients with a first, nonfatal MI admitted to these hospitals and 6800 controls randomly selected from the same counties. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported medication use assessed through telephone interviews. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio for MI among celecoxib users, relative to persons who did not use nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.79) compared with 1.16 (CI, 0.70 to 1.93) among rofecoxib users. The use of rofecoxib was associated with a statistically significant higher odds of MI compared with the use of celecoxib (adjusted odds ratio for rofecoxib vs. celecoxib, 2.72 [CI, 1.24 to 5.95]; P = 0.01). Nonselective NSAIDs were associated with a reduced odds of nonfatal MI relative to nonusers. Comparisons of COX-2 inhibitors with nonselective NSAIDs were the following: rofecoxib versus naproxen (odds ratio, 3.39 [CI, 1.37 to 8.40]) and celecoxib versus ibuprofen or diclofenac (odds ratio, 0.77 [CI, 0.40 to 1.48]). LIMITATIONS: The possibility of recall bias and uncontrolled confounding in this observational study limit the ability to make definitive conclusions. The association of celecoxib with a lower odds of MI could have occurred by chance. Only about 50% of eligible participants completed telephone interviews. CONCLUSION: Celecoxib and rofecoxib were associated with different odds of MI. Cardiovascular effects among the COX-2 inhibitors seem different, but further studies, preferably randomized trials, are needed to fully understand the spectrum of effects of COX-2 inhibitors and potential differences among them.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Hemodynamics and survival of patients with portopulmonary hypertension.

It is not known whether patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with portal hypertension (portopulmonary hypertension (PPHTN) have different disease characteristics from those of patients with other forms of pulmonary arterial hypertension. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with PPHTN and patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension that was idiopathic, familial, or associated with anorexigen use (IPAH) to determine whether hemodynamics or survival were different between these groups. We included consecutive patients who underwent initial pulmonary artery catheterization and vasodilator testing at our center between January 1997 and May 2001 and who were followed until January 2004. Patients with PPHTN (N = 13) had a higher cardiac index and lower pulmonary vascular resistance than patients with IPAH (N = 33) (P < or = 0.001). Right atrial pressure and pulmonary artery pressure were similar between the groups. Patients with PPHTN had a higher risk of death in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: [HR] = 2.8, 95% CI 1.04-7.4; P = 0.04). These findings were not affected by adjustment for differences in laboratory values, hemodynamics, or therapy. In conclusion, patients with PPHTN have a higher risk of death than that of patients with IPAH, despite having a higher cardiac index and lower pulmonary vascular resistance. Future studies of the specific mechanisms of and therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension should focus on the distinctions between the different forms of this disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Potential limitations of electronic database studies of prescription non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NANSAIDs) and risk of myocardial infarction (MI).

PURPOSE: To determine whether specific limitations in electronic database studies may lead to biased estimates of the association between prescription, non-selective non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NANSAIDs) and myocardial infarction (MI) METHODS: Using our case-control study of NANSAIDs and first, non-fatal MI, we determined the odds ratio (OR) for prescription NANSAIDs and MI. In the 'Replicating Electronic Database Analysis,' we considered non-prescription NANSAID users to be 'non-users,' did not stratify by aspirin use, and did not adjust for confounders typically unavailable or incomplete in existing databases. In the 'Misclassification Assessment Analysis,' we removed non-prescription NANSAIDs from the 'non-user' category. In the 'Confounding Assessment Analysis #1,' we additionally adjusted for smoking, family history, and years of education. In the 'Confounding Assessment Analysis #2,' we also adjusted for body mass index (BMI) and physical activity. In the 'Interaction Assessment Analysis,' we stratified on aspirin use and repeated the latter analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of current NANSAID and aspirin use was higher in our controls than in electronic database studies, consistent with the fact that non-prescription NANSAIDs accounted for 81% of all NANSAID use. Education, physical activity, and BMI also were associated with prescription NANSAID use. When each potential source of bias was removed, the OR for NANSAIDs moved further from 1.0 (i.e., toward a protective association with MI): 'Replicating Electronic Database' analysis (OR 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78--1.28); 'Misclassification Assessment Analysis' (OR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.70--1.14); 'Confounding Assessment Analysis #1' (OR 0.85, 95%CI: 0.66--1.10); 'Confounding Assessment Analysis #2' (OR 0.78, 95%CI: 0.60--1.01); 'Interaction Assessment Analysis' (OR 0.69, 95%CI: 0.51--0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Limitations in electronic databases may be responsible for the lack of association of NANSAIDs on lower MI risk noted in these studies. Further studies-preferably randomized trials-are needed to address the risk-benefit ratio of NANSAID use.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Risk of serious upper gastrointestinal toxicity with over-the-counter nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Use of prescription nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NANSAIDs) increases the risk of serious upper gastrointestinal toxicity. Less is known about over-the-counter (OTC) NANSAIDs, which are typically used at lower doses and for shorter durations. This study assessed the risk of toxicity with OTC NANSAIDs. METHODS: A total of 359 case subjects hospitalized for upper gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation, or benign gastric outlet obstruction were recruited from 28 hospitals. A total of 1889 control subjects were recruited by random digit dialing from the same region. Data on medication use were collected via structured telephone interview. RESULTS: Use of OTC NANSAIDs on > or = 4 days during the most recent week had an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-2.95). Use of high-dose OTC NANSAIDs during the index week had an adjusted OR of 5.21 (95% CI, 2.32-11.69). In contrast, use of OTC NANSAIDs <4 times during the index week (adjusted OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43-1.06) and use of very low doses of prescription or OTC NANSAIDs during the index week (adjusted OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.49-1.12) were not significantly associated with an increased risk of serious gastrointestinal toxicity. We did not observe a significant difference between the risk of toxicity with OTC naproxen versus OTC ibuprofen (adjusted OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.26-2.70). CONCLUSIONS: Use of OTC NANSAIDs at recommended doses has a relatively good safety profile compared with prescription NANSAIDs. However, use of high-dose OTC NANSAIDs (comparable to a prescription dose) is associated with serious gastrointestinal toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The effect of cardiac troponin testing on clinical care in a veterans population: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin is more accurate than creatine kinase (CK) testing for detecting myocardial injury in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), but its effects on clinical care compared with CK testing alone is open to question. OBJECTIVE: To test the effects of troponin I on medical decisions for patients undergoing cardiac enzyme testing. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Urban academic Veterans Affairs medical center. PATIENTS: Three hundred ninety-two patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) and outpatient settings with symptoms and/or electrocardiograms suggestive but not diagnostic of ACS. INTERVENTION: Random assignment to linked CK-troponin I (CKTnI) testing or CK testing alone. MEASUREMENTS: ED discharge and cardiac catheterization incidence (primary); ED medication use, inpatient noninvasive testing, revascularization procedures, discharge medications, and 8-week ED visits, hospitalizations, and procedures (secondary). RESULTS: Groups were similar in all variables except history of heart failure (CK 26.8% vs CKTnI 17.0%). ACS comprised 12.2% of the cohort. ED discharge incidence was greater in the CKTnI arm (18% vs 9.6%; relative risk [RR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.08 to 3.31; P=.02; number needed to test=12.6; 95% CI, 4.5 to 130). Troponin testing had no significant effect on catheterization incidence (18.2% vs 14.5%; RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.92; P>.20) or other outcomes except follow-up echocardiography (13.4% vs 7.4%; RR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.69; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a veterans population undergoing cardiac enzyme testing, CKTnI testing led to more ED discharges than CK testing alone but had no effect on inpatient care and was associated with more echocardiograms in a follow-up period.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Medication safety in older adults: home-based practice patterns.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the current state of medication-taking practices of community-dwelling older adults on high-risk medications. DESIGN: Telephone survey of older adults filling prescriptions for warfarin, digoxin, or phenytoin from May 2, 2002, through June 30, 2003. SETTING: The Pennsylvania Pharmacy Assistance Contract for the Elderly (PACE) Program, a state-run program providing prescription drug coverage for poor older adults. PARTICIPANTS: PACE members. MEASUREMENTS: Patients self-reported sources of information on current medications as well as home-based practices for organizing medication regimens. RESULTS: Four thousand nine hundred fifty-five PACE members were interviewed. Thirty-two percent of the sample reported that they had not received any specific instructions about their medications, 35% reported that they received instructions from their primary care provider, and 46% indicated they received them from a pharmacist. Fifty-four percent of participants indicated that they used a pillbox for organizing their medications. Older adults prescribed warfarin were more likely to report receiving instructions than those prescribed digoxin or phenytoin. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of older adults on high-risk medications do not recall receiving instructions for the use of their medications and do not take advantage of existing systems for organizing medication regimens. Improved patient education and delivery of medication organization systems are immediate opportunities to potentially reduce the risk of medication errors in older people.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Impact of primary graft failure on outcomes following lung transplantation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Primary graft failure (PGF) is a severe acute lung injury syndrome that occurs following lung transplantation. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients who developed PGF with those who did not. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 255 consecutive lung transplant procedures. PGF was defined as (1) diffuse alveolar opacities developing within 72 h of transplantation, (2) an arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio of < 200 beyond 48 h postoperatively, and (3) no other secondary cause of graft dysfunction. PGF was tested for acceptance with 30-day and all-cause hospital mortality rates, overall survival, hospital length of stay (HLOS), duration of mechanical ventilation, and best 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance achieved within 12 months. SETTING: Academic medical center. RESULTS: The overall incidence of PGF was 11.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9 to 15.9%). The all-cause mortality rate at 30 days was 63.3% in patients with PGF and 8.8% in patients without PGF (relative risk [RR], 7.15; 95% CI, 4.34 to 11.80%; p < 0.001). A total of 73.3% of patients with PGF died during hospitalization vs 14.2% of patients without PGF (RR, 5.18%; 95% CI, 3.51 to 7.63; p < 0.001). The median HLOS in 30-day survivors was 47 days in patients with PGF vs 15 days in those without PGF (p < 0.001), and the mean duration of mechanical ventilation was 15 days in patients with PGF vs 1 day in those without PGF (p < 0.001). By 12 months, a total of 28.5% of survivors with PGF achieved a normal age-appropriate 6MWT distance vs 71.4% of survivors without PGF at 12 months (p = 0.014). The median best 6MWT distance achieved within the first 12 months was 1,196 feet in patients with PGF vs 1,546 feet in those without PGF (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: PGF has a significant impact on mortality, HLOS, and duration of mechanical ventilation following lung transplantation. Survivors of PGF have a protracted recovery with impaired physical function up to 1 year following transplantation.

Exercise Test↗
PubMed2004

Class effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on prevention of myocardial infarction.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors differ in their affinity for tissue-bound ACE. It has been hypothesized that tissue ACE affinity might be responsible for some of the beneficial cardiovascular properties of ACE inhibitors. The present study examined this question and found no correlation between tissue ACE affinity and risk of first nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients who have hypertension.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers have slightly different mechanisms of action. As such, it has been hypothesized that these 2 classes of medications differ in their ability to prevent myocardial infarction. In the present case-control study, we found no difference between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in the primary prevention of nonfatal myocardial infarction among patients with hypertension.

Adult↗