PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stephen H Miller

Publications and source records attributed to Stephen H Miller.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

ABMS' Maintenance of Certification: the challenge of continuing competence.

The American Board of Medical Specialties, since its inception in 1933 as the Advisory Board for Medical Specialties, is concerned with the education, training and certification of physician specialists. Although not perfect, the initial certification process is quite good and accomplishes its intended purpose. However, initial certification is based on a primarily knowledge-based "snapshot." The newly developed Maintenance of Certification Program will evaluate the competencies, medical knowledge, patient care, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practices believed to be necessary and sufficient for certified physicians to have and maintain throughout their entire professional career. Furthermore, the process will focus on education and assessment to encourage continuous quality improvement in clinical practice.

Advisory Committees↗
PubMed2005

American Board of Medical Specialties and repositioning for excellence in lifelong learning: maintenance of certification.

The board certification movement was founded out of a concern for the quality of care, and today, more than 85% of all physicians licensed to practice medicine in the United States have been certified by an American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) member board. There is increasing evidence of a need for continuous monitoring and promotion of quality as well as for assessment and documentation that certified medical specialists are keeping up-to-date so that their continuing competence can be documented. To help, the ABMS established a program called Maintenance of Certification, a system that includes periodic examination of knowledge and the comprehensive evaluation of practice. Maintenance of Certification includes 4 major components: professional standing, including an unrestricted license to practice medicine; lifelong learning and self-assessment; demonstrated cognitive expertise; and practice performance assessment. The efforts of the Conjoint Committee on Continuing Medical Education press continuing medical education providers to facilitate self-directed learning and directed self-learning while driving lifelong learning and assessment into the clinical practices of all physicians who seek to continuously upgrade their knowledge, skills, and behaviors to provide quality medical care.

Certification↗
PubMed2002

Effects of managed care on teaching, research, and clinical practice in academic plastic surgery.

The aim of this study was to determine: 1) if there have been changes in teaching, research, and clinical practice in academic plastic surgery in recent years; and 2) if there have been, are they associated with changes in the managed care environment? Gaining a clearer perspective on how managed care affects academic plastic surgery will enable academicians to define better the problems and opportunities they face mutually and to respond effectively to these issues. This study used a cross-sectional study design. Reference time periods were the premanaged care era (1990-1991) versus the current time (1997-1998). Data were collected by questionnaires sent to 94 academic program directors in plastic surgery. The main independent variable of managed care was measured as the difference in the percent of income from health maintenance organizations generated by each program in 1990 to 1991 versus 1997 to 1998. The dependent variables of teaching, research, and clinical practice were measured by the percentage of time spent in each category, the number of work hours per week, the number of staff personnel, the location of teaching, the number of grants and publications, and the percentage of reconstructive and cosmetic cases in 1990 to 1991 versus 1997 to 1998. Univariate analysis, paired Student's t-test, Fisher's exact test, Pearson's correlation, Spearman's correlation, and linear regression were used to establish significance (alpha = 0.05) of the effects of managed care on dependent variables. Sixty-six questionnaires were completed and returned (70% response rate). There were significant changes in the managed care environment, clinical practice (operating room and clinics), and research in academic plastic surgery from 1990 to 1997. The percentage of income generated from managed care increased from 9.8% (of total revenue) in 1990 to 23.6% in 1997 (an increase of 13.8%; p < 0.0001). Academic plastic surgeons were found to spend significantly more time in clinical practice (3% more of total time spent; 5.3 hours more per week in 1997; p < 0.016). This change correlated significantly with the increase in managed care (p < 0.015). In addition, the percentage of cosmetic cases increased from 18.0% in 1990 to 28.3% in 1997 (p < 0.001), and that of reconstructive surgery was reduced proportionately (p < 0.001). Also, a significant decrease in the time spent for research was observed (mean reduction, 2.8 hours less per week; p < 0.001). Although the trend was to a lower number, there were no significant changes in the amount of time spent in teaching (p > 0.08) and in administrative duty (p > 0.06), or in the number of personnel employed in the teaching programs (p > 0.05). In summary, these findings suggest that: 1) a greater percentage of revenue was generated from managed care in 1997 than in 1990, indicating a growing fiscal influence by managed care on academic plastic surgery; 2) furthermore, this change is associated with academic plastic surgeons devoting more time to clinical practice and less time to research endeavors; and 3) although managed care policies do affect teaching adversely, this effect has not yet reached significance for the period examined during this study.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed2002

Specialty board certification and clinical outcomes: the missing link.

PURPOSE: Specialty board certification status is often used as a standard of excellence, but no systematic review has examined the link between certification and clinical outcomes. The authors evaluated published studies tracking clinical outcomes and certification status. METHOD: Data sources consisted of studies cited between 1966 and July 1999 in OVID-Medline, psychological abstracts (PsycLit), and the Educational Research Information Clearinghouse (ERIC). Screening criteria included: only U.S. patients and physicians used as subjects; verified specialty board certification status by an American Board of Medical Specialties' (ABMS') member board using the ABMS database or derivative sources; described selection criteria for patients and physicians; selected nationally recognized standards of care for outcomes; and nested patient data by individual physician. The computerized searches that were conducted in 1999 identified 1,204 papers; one author and a research assistant selected 237 papers based on subject relevance, and reduced the list to 56 based on study quality. The authors independently applied inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify 13 of the 56 papers containing 33 separable relevant findings. RESULTS: Of the 33 findings, 16 demonstrated a significant positive association between certification status and positive clinical outcomes, three revealed worse outcomes for certified physicians, and 14 showed no association. Three negative findings and one finding of no association were identified in two papers with insufficient case-mix adjustments in the analyses. Meta-analytic statistics were not feasible due to variability in outcome measures across studies. CONCLUSIONS: Few published studies (5%) used research methods appropriate for the research question, and among the screened studies more than half support an association between board certification status and positive clinical outcomes.

Accreditation↗