PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stephen Pitts

Publications and source records attributed to Stephen Pitts.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Assessing resident skills in the use of rescue airway devices.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Airway control is a vital procedure for the specialty of emergency medicine. Although endotracheal intubation is the preferred method to obtain a definitive airway, several devices have been developed to help physicians handle a difficult or failed intubation. Using a bench model, we assessed the efficacy of an advanced airway training program. METHODS: Residents of an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited 3-year emergency medicine residency program participated in an advanced airway course. Psychomotor skills were assessed for the laryngeal mask airway, intubating laryngeal mask airway (Fastrac), and Combitube (esophageal-tracheal twin-lumen airway device). The outcome variable was the time necessary to successfully insert and ventilate an airway mannequin. The skills were assessed at 0, 6, and 12 months after training. Information including previous and interval experience with these devices was recorded. RESULTS: The airway mannequin was successfully ventilated using the laryngeal mask airway, Fastrac, and Combitube in 6.9, 51.0, and 21.5 seconds, respectively. There was a modest interval increase in mean time required to place the laryngeal mask airway and Combitube at 6 and 12 months after training. A decrease was noted in the time to place the Fastrac. Previous and interval experience did not affect performance. CONCLUSION: Airway competency is a key component of emergency medicine training. Training should include mastery of rescue devices for the failed or difficult airway. Our findings suggest that emergency medicine residents can learn and retain these airway skills.

Clinical Competence↗

Quality of health care surveillance systems: review and implementation in the Swiss setting.

Quality of health care has been a subject of attention for many years in the USA and in Europe. Since the introduction of the new federal law on insurance in 1996 it has evolved to a progressively more important issue within the Swiss health care system. In this review, some theoretical concepts of quality of health care, variations, and surveillance systems are explored. Examples of quality of health care surveillance systems that have been developed successfully in the USA, in Canada, in Australia, and in Europe are discussed. They all demonstrate the interest in creating a large range of quality indicators in the surveillance system and in evaluating hospital performance using a benchmark approach. Currently, the measurement of quality with appropriate indicators is a subject of intense debate between the Swiss Hospitals Association (H+) and the Swiss Health Insurance Consortium (Santésuisse). Examples of existing surveillance systems in Switzerland are the Outcome Verein in Zurich and the quality of care program of the Canton of Valais. The FoQual association has also contributed to the debate by reviewing six indicators, which could be used nationally for a healthcare surveillance system. In this debate it is important to stress that ideal quality indicators intended for use as measures of quality in Swiss hospitals need to be both appropriate and valid. Only indicators that fulfil these conditions should be integrated in a Swiss health care surveillance system. Priority needs to be given to quality indicators and methods with the highest level of evidence and with a solid scientific basis.

Australia↗