PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stephen Sands

Publications and source records attributed to Stephen Sands.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Project Sickle Cure: A Prospective, International Observational Study of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease.

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic and life-limiting hemoglobin and systemic vascular disease. While over 1000 people have undergone hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) over the last 40 years, long-term disease-specific and health-related quality of life data are lacking. The American Society of Hematology 2021 Guidelines for SCD emphasized the need for more detailed registry data to inform patients and providers with decision-making and practice recommendations. PROCEDURES: In January 2021, the Sickle Cell Transplant Advocacy and Research Alliance (STAR) launched Project Sickle Cure (PSC). This multi-center, prospective study of patients who have undergone HCT for SCD includes baseline demographics and SCD-specific post-HCT outcomes, serial neurocognitive testing, health-related quality of life measures, health equity evaluations, a neuroimaging bank, detailed evaluation of neurologic status pre- and post-transplant, and chronic pain evaluation. A biorepository is in the planning stage of development. RESULTS: As of November 2025, 115 participants have enrolled at 18 STAR sites with enrollment ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: PSC is a STAR prospective study which will address a major gap in our understanding of outcomes post-HCT specific to SCD. WeDecide, a larger study comparing HCT health-related quality of life outcomes to those who receive non-transplant disease modifying therapy (NT-DMT) is in development, and PSC will provide the HCT comparator data. These data will also be highly relevant as other curative and transformative therapies, such as gene therapy, become more widely used.

Humans↗

Overview of artifact reduction and removal in evoked potential and event-related potential recordings.

Artifact in one form or another needs to be contended with in all EEG and EP studies. Various methods have been employed to avoid, eliminate, or minimize artifact. This article has described the methods that have been available for some time and newer methods and their advantages. It is the authors' hope that through the use of these methods the accuracy of all EP and ERP measurements will be improved and promote the validity and general acceptance of EP and ERP recordings. Genuine and valuable data are contained in EPs and ERPs. The challenge is to extract relatively small voltage signals often occurring within a higher voltage background of artifact. The computing power required to perform the artifact removal/reduction procedures now is available with basic laptop and desktop computers, as are the software programs that provide the artifact removal/reduction capabilities. It may be of interest for a prudent researcher to integrate the currently available artifact rejection methods before subjecting the ERP and EP data for further analysis and subsequent publication.

Artifacts↗

Overview of dipole source localization.

Truly accurate dipole source localization relies on having (1) reliable, artifact-free EP/ERP (or magnetoelectroencephalogram) data to start with; (2) landmark and electrode position data obtained with a three-dimensional digitizer; (3) MRI (or CT) data from the same subject (with a means to measure the same landmarks); (4) the capability to apply different dipole and volume conductor models; and (5) the ability to coregister the functional and anatomic data to display the final source solutions. Most important is to have a thorough understanding of the fundamental principles of the localization programs and neurophysiologic processes. Localization programs are simply tools. Used incorrectly, they can yield meaningless results. Used correctly, they can provide a window into neurophysiologic functioning that is not available through any other means.

Brain↗