PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stephen W Jones

Publications and source records attributed to Stephen W Jones.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Resident neuroelectrochemical interfacing using carbon nanofiber arrays.

Carbon nanofiber electrode architectures are used to provide for long-term, neuroelectroanalytical measurements of the dynamic processes of intercellular communication between excitable cells. Individually addressed, vertically aligned carbon nanofibers are incorporated into multielement electrode arrays upon which excitable cell matrixes of both neuronal-like derived cell lines (rat pheochromocytoma, PC-12) and primary cells (dissociated cells from embryonic rat hippocampus) are cultured over extended periods (days to weeks). Electrode arrays are characterized with respect to their response to easily oxidized neurotransmitters, including dopamine, norepinephrine, and 5-hydroxytyramide. Electroanalysis at discrete electrodes following long-term cell culture demonstrates that this platform remains responsive for the detection of easily oxidized species generated by the cultured cells. Preliminary data also suggests that quantal release of easily oxidized transmitters can be observed at nanofiber electrodes following direct culture and differentiation on the arrays for periods of at least 16 days.

Animals↗

Human TRPC6 expressed in HEK 293 cells forms non-selective cation channels with limited Ca2+ permeability.

TRPC6 is thought to be a Ca(2+)-permeable cation channel activated following stimulation of G-protein-coupled membrane receptors linked to phospholipase C (PLC). TRPC6 current is also activated by exogenous application of 1-oleoyl-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG) or by inhibiting 1,2-diacylglycerol (DAG) lipase activity using RHC80267. In the present study, both OAG and RHC80267 increased whole-cell TRPC6 current in cells from a human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK 293) stably expressing TRPC6, but neither compound increased cytosolic free Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) when the cells were bathed in high-K(+) buffer to hold the membrane potential near 0 mV. These results suggested that TRPC6 channels have limited Ca(2+) permeability relative to monovalent cation permeability and/or that Ca(2+) influx via TRPC6 is greatly attenuated by depolarization. To evaluate Ca(2+) permeability, TRPC6 currents were examined in extracellular buffer in which Ca(2+) was varied from 0.02 to 20 mm. The results were consistent with a pore-permeation model in which Ca(2+) acts primarily as a blocking ion and contributes only a small percentage ( approximately 4%) to whole-cell currents in the presence of extracellular Na(+). Measurement of single-cell fura-2 fluorescence during perforated-patch recording of TRPC6 currents showed that OAG increased [Ca(2+)](i) 50-100 nm when the membrane potential was clamped at between -50 and -80 mV, but had little or no effect if the membrane potential was left uncontrolled. These results suggest that in cells exhibiting a high input resistance, the primary effect of activating TRPC6 will be membrane depolarization. However, in cells able to maintain a hyperpolarized potential (e.g. cells with a large inwardly rectifying or Ca(2+)-activated K(+) current), activation of TRPC6 will lead to a sustained increase in [Ca(2+)](i). Thus, the contribution of TRPC6 current to both the kinetics and magnitude of the Ca(2+) response will be cell specific and dependent upon the complement of other channel types.

Calcium↗

The amplitude distribution of release events through a fusion pore.

Neurotransmitters, hormones, or dyes may be released from vesicles via a fusion pore, rather than by full fusion of the vesicle with the plasma membrane. If the lifetime of the fusion pore is comparable to the time required for the substance to exit the vesicle, only a fraction of the total vesicle content may be released during a single pore opening. Assuming 1), fusion pore lifetimes are exponentially distributed (tauP), as expected for simple single channel openings, and 2), vesicle contents are lost through the fusion pore with an exponential time course (tauD), we derive an analytical expression for the probability density function of the fraction of vesicle content released (F): dP/dF=A (1-F)(A-1), where A=tauD/tauP. If A>1, the maximum of the distribution is at F=0; if A<1, the maximum is at F=1; if A=1, the distribution is perfectly flat. Thus, the distribution never has a peak in the middle (0<F<1). This should be considered when interpreting the distribution of miniature synaptic currents, or the fraction of FM dye molecules lost during a single fusion pore opening event.

Cell Membrane Permeability↗

Y3+ block demonstrates an intracellular activation gate for the alpha1G T-type Ca2+ channel.

Classical electrophysiology and contemporary crystallography suggest that the activation gate of voltage-dependent channels is on the intracellular side, but a more extracellular "pore gate" has also been proposed. We have used the voltage dependence of block by extracellular Y(3+) as a tool to locate the activation gate of the alpha1G (Ca(V)3.1) T-type calcium channel. Y(3+) block exhibited no clear voltage dependence from -40 to +40 mV (50% block at 25 nM), but block was relieved rapidly by stronger depolarization. Reblock of the open channel, reflected in accelerated tail currents, was fast and concentration dependent. Closed channels were also blocked by Y(3+) at a concentration-dependent rate, only eightfold slower than open-channel block. When extracellular Ca(2+) was replaced with Ba(2+), the rate of open block by Y(3+) was unaffected, but closed block was threefold faster than in Ca(2+), suggesting the slower closed-block rate reflects ion-ion interactions in the pore rather than an extracellularly located gate. Since an extracellular blocker can rapidly enter the closed pore, the primary activation gate must be on the intracellular side of the selectivity filter.

Animals↗

Calcium channels: unanswered questions.

Despite decades of intensive research, many questions remain unresolved regarding the structure and function of voltage-dependent calcium channels. This review considers some of those questions: Where is the activation gate? Where are the inactivation gates? How are the voltage sensors coupled to the gates? Are bacterial K+ channels good models for the Ca2+ channel pore? Are protein-protein interactions fundamental to Ca2+ channel function? Do voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels regulate basal intracellular Ca2+? Are N and P/Q channels specialized for fast neurotransmitter release?

Amino Acid Sequence↗