PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Steve Caine

Publications and source records attributed to Steve Caine.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Developing a large electronic primary care database (Doctors' Independent Network) for research.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Primary care databases form a unique source of population-based clinical information on the prevalence and management of diagnosed disorders. Historically such databases have lacked individual level socio-economic markers. We describe the development of the Doctors' Independent Network (DIN) database for epidemiological and health services research. DIN includes a socio-economic marker (ACORN) based on postcode linkage at individual patient level. The validity of DIN is assessed against the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). METHODS: External validity is assessed by comparing the demographic structure and prevalence rates for treated ischemic heart disease (IHD) and treated hay fever with those from the GPRD. We assess the utility of a socio-economic measure (ACORN) based on postcode-linkage at individual patient level by examining the trend in prevalence rates of IHD and hay fever by ACORN index. RESULTS: 142 practices providing high quality data were selected, with 1827361 fully registered patients contributing data between 1992 and 2001, representing an identical age-sex structure to that for England & Wales and GPRD. Regionally adjusted prevalence of treated IHD (7.29 and 5.37%, respectively for men and women aged 35+ in 1998) in DIN was highly comparable to GPRD (7.27 and 5.42%). In DIN, the odds ratio of IHD was 1.37 (95% CI 1.30-1.44) in subjects living in "striving" compared to "thriving" areas. The prevalence of treated hay fever prevalence was similar across databases, with inverse associations seen with ACORN in DIN (higher rates in "thriving" areas). CONCLUSIONS: DIN provides comparable period prevalence rates to GPRD for two common conditions, with social trends as expected. Primary care databases such as these have the potential to replace the decennial national morbidity surveys carried out in UK general practices, with DIN having the important advantage of including a socio-economic index.

Adolescent↗

Implications of the problem orientated medical record (POMR) for research using electronic GP databases: a comparison of the Doctors Independent Network Database (DIN) and the General Practice Research Database (GPRD).

BACKGROUND: The General Practice Research Database (GPRD) and Doctor's Independent Network Database (DIN), are large electronic primary care databases compiled in the UK during the 1990s. They provide a valuable resource for epidemiological and health services research. GPRD (based on VAMP) presents notes as a series of discrete episodes, whereas DIN is based on a system (MEDITEL) that used a Problem Orientated Medical Record (POMR) which links prescriptions to diagnostic problems. We have examined the implications for research of these different underlying philosophies. METHODS: Records of 40,183 children from 141 practices in DIN and 76,310 from 464 practices in GRPD who were followed to age 5 were used to compare the volume of recording of prescribing and diagnostic codes in the two databases. To assess the importance and additional value of the POMR within DIN, the appropriateness of diagnostic linking to skin emollient prescriptions was investigated. RESULTS: Variation between practices for both the number of days on which prescriptions were issued and diagnoses were recorded was marked in both databases. Mean number of "prescription days" during the first 5 years of life was similar in DIN (19.5) and in GPRD (19.8), but the average number of "diagnostic days" was lower in DIN (15.8) than in GPRD (22.9). Adjustment for linkage increased the average "diagnostic days" to 23.1 in DIN. 32.7% of emollient prescriptions in GPRD appeared with an eczema diagnosis on the same day compared to only 19.4% in DIN; however, 86.4% of prescriptions in DIN were linked to an earlier eczema diagnosis. More specifically 83% of emollient prescriptions appeared under a problem heading of eczema in the 121 practices that were using problem headings satisfactorily. CONCLUSION: Prescribing records in DIN and GPRD are very similar, but the usage of diagnostic codes is more parsimonious in DIN because of its POMR structure. Period prevalence rates will be underestimated in DIN unless this structure is taken into account. The advantage of the POMR is that in 121 of 141 practices using problem headings as intended, most prescriptions can be linked to a problem heading providing a specific reason for their issue.

Child, Preschool↗