HLA matching for kidney transplantation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Steve Takemoto.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: HLAMatchmaker is a computer algorithm that determines human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility at the level of polymorphic amino acid triplets in antibody-accessible sequence positions. Recent studies have shown that HLA-DR-matched kidney transplant recipients with zero to two triplet mismatches had almost identical graft survival rates as those with zero HLA-A,B,DR antigen mismatches. This report describes how HLAMatchmaker can be used to identify more compatible donors for highly sensitized patients. METHODS: The HLAMatchmaker program was used to calculate the probability of finding a donor (PFD) with zero, one, or two triplet mismatches for 54 highly sensitized patients waiting for a kidney transplant and having panel reactive antibody (PRA) values greater than 85% and 50 randomly selected nonsensitized patients with PRA values less than 3%. RESULTS: There was a wide variability for PFD values for the two patient cohorts. If only donors with zero HLA-A,B mismatches were deemed acceptable for recipients, the median PFD of a zero-antigen mismatch was 0.046% for nonsensitized patients and 0.009% for highly sensitized patients (P=0.007). Half of the highly sensitized patients had a PFD below 0.01%, or fewer than 1 in 10,000 donors would have zero antigen mismatches. Application of HLAMatchmaker identified additional HLA antigens with zero-triplet mismatches for 27 patients, resulting in a 1.8-fold increase in PFD. Considering additional antigens with one-triplet or two-triplet mismatches increased the PFD by an additional 3.8-fold and 13.7-fold, respectively. Acceptable antigen mismatches for 37 of the 54 highly sensitized patients were identified by consistently negative reactions in serum screens, and their addition resulted in a 12.7-fold increase of the PFD to a median of 0.141%. Applying these acceptable antigens to the HLAMatchmaker algorithm identified additional antigens with zero or acceptable triplet mismatches and their inclusion increased the PFD by 3.3-fold to 0.347%. CONCLUSIONS: HLAMatchmaker offers a valuable strategy for identifying more suitably HLA-matched donors and has the potential for alleviating the problem of accumulation of highly sensitized patients on the transplant waiting list.
BACKGROUND: HLAMatchmaker is a recently developed computer-based algorithm to determine donor-recipient HLA compatibility at the molecular level. Originally designed for highly alloimmunized patients, this algorithm is based on the concept that immunogenic epitopes are represented by amino acid triplets on exposed parts of protein sequences of HLA-A, -B, and -C chains accessible to alloantibodies. Donor HLA compatibility is determined by intralocus and interlocus comparisons of triplets in polymorphic sequence positions. For most patients, HLAMatchmaker can identify certain mismatched HLA antigens that are zero-triplet mismatches to the patient's HLA phenotype and should, therefore, be considered fully histocompatible. The present study was designed to determine how class I HLA matching at the triplet level affects kidney transplant outcome. METHODS: We analyzed two multicenter databases of zero-HLA-DR-mismatched kidneys transplanted from 1987 to 1999. One database consisted of 31,879 primary allografts registered by U.S. transplant centers in the United Network for Organ Sharing database and the other consisted of 15,872 transplants in the Eurotransplant program. RESULTS: HLA-A,B mismatched kidneys that were compatible at the triplet level exhibited almost identical graft survival rates as the zero-HLA-A,B antigen mismatches defined by conventional criteria. This beneficial effect of triplet matching was seen for both nonsensitized and sensitized patients and also for white and nonwhite patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the application of HLAMatchmaker will increase the number of successful transplants, at least in the HLA-DR match combinations.
BACKGROUND: Acute cellular rejection is the mechanism of most immune-related injury in cardiac transplant recipients. However, antibody-mediated humoral rejection (HR) has also been implicated as an important clinical entity following orthotopic heart transplantation. Humoral rejection has been reported to play a role in graft dysfunction in the early post-transplant period, and to be a risk factor for the development of transplant coronary artery disease. Some involved in transplantation pathology doubt the existence of clinically significant humoral rejection in cardiac allografts. Those who recognize its existence disagree on its possible role in graft dysfunction or graft coronary artery disease. In this study, we report clinical features of patients with the pathologic diagnosis of HR at our institution since July 1997, when we began systematic surveillance for humoral rejection. METHODS: We reviewed medical records of patients with the pathologic diagnosis of HR without concurrent cellular rejection between July 1997 and January 2001. Diagnosis was based on routine histology ("swollen cells" distending capillaries, interstitial edema and hemorrhage) and immunofluorescence (capillary deposition of immunoglobulin and complement with HLA-DR positivity), or immunoperoxidase staining of paraffin-embedded tissue (numerous CD68-positive macrophages and fewer swollen endothelial cells distending capillaries). RESULTS: A total of 44 patients (4 to 74 years old) showed evidence of HR without concurrent cellular rejection at autopsy or on one or more biopsies. Although females comprised only 26% of our transplant population, 23 patients (52%) with HR were female. A positive peri-operative flow cytometry T-cell crossmatch was observed in 32% of HR patients compared with 12% of controls (p = 0.02). Hemodynamic compromise consisting of shock, hypotension, decreased cardiac output/index and/or a rise in capillary wedge or pulmonary artery pressure was observed in 47% of patients at the time of diagnosis of HR. Six patients (5 females) died (14% mortality) with evidence of HR at or just before autopsy, 6 days to 16 months after transplantation. The incidence of transplant coronary artery disease was 10% greater at 1 year, and 36% greater at 5 years, in patients with HR when compared with non-HR patients. CONCLUSIONS: Humoral rejection was associated with acute hemodynamic compromise in 47% of patients, and was the direct cause of death in 6 patients (13%). Humoral rejection is a clinicopathologic entity with a high incidence in women and is associated with acute hemodynamic compromise, accelerated transplant coronary artery disease and death.