Biomedical subjects

Steven J Shichman

Publications and source records attributed to Steven J Shichman.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Survey from skills-based hands on learning courses demonstrates increased laparoscopic caseload and clinical laparoscopic suturing.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the American Urological Association Hands on Laparoscopy course on the participants' practices. Many urologists without fellowship training perform laparoscopy, but do not advance beyond hand-assisted, extirpative laparoscopy. The American Urological Association Hands on Laparoscopy course was designed to help these practitioners advance their skills. METHODS: A total of 68 urologists, aged 31 to 61 years (mean 46.6), participated in one of the four courses given between August 2002 and March 2004. The 2-day course included performing standardized tasks under videotape analysis and participating in porcine and pelvic trainer laboratory sessions. Surveys were sent by regular and electronic mail in September 2004 to assess the courses' impact. The mean follow-up was 15.2 months (range 7 to 25). RESULTS: Of the 68 surveys mailed, 54 were returned (79%). Most respondents were in private practice and had had prior experience with extirpative laparoscopy. Of the respondents, 41 (76%) reported that their laparoscopic practice had expanded after taking the course, with 34% performing at least 2 cases per month. Also, 33 respondents (61%) reported performing laparoscopic suturing after taking the course, with 35% having sutured a bleeding vessel. Of the respondents, 85% reported that the video mentoring during the course was helpful. Of those who purchased a pelvic trainer, 90% reported practicing on it regularly. CONCLUSIONS: The Hands on Laparoscopy course appeared to contribute to expansion of laparoscopic practices. Experience gained from skills-based lectures, videotape analysis of pelvic trainer performance, and a mentored porcine laboratory resulted in most (61%) participants expanding their practice to include clinical laparoscopic suturing.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Hand-assisted laparoscopy for large renal specimens: a multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVES: To present our experience with hand-assisted laparoscopy (HAL) for larger renal specimens. One of the theoretical benefits of HAL is the ability to manage large renal specimens, which we defined as tumors greater than 7 cm, and tumors in obese patients. METHODS: Between March 1998 and October 2000, 106 HAL radical nephrectomies were performed for enhancing renal masses, for which 95 patients had complete preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data. Of the 95 patients, 32 underwent HAL for large tumors (7 cm or greater) and 41 had a body mass index of 31 or greater. The demographic and outcome data of these two groups were compared with 63 patients who underwent HAL for tumors less than 7 cm and 54 patients with a body mass index of less than 31. RESULTS: When comparing cohorts by tumor size, the only statistically significant differences were in convalescence and specimen weight. Patients with lesions 7 cm or greater required 21 days to recover compared with 18 days for patients with lesions less than 7 cm. Obese patients had statistically significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications, longer operative times (214 versus 176 minutes), and longer convalescences (21 versus 17.5 days) compared with nonobese patients. The estimated blood loss and conversion rate was not different between the groups. Furthermore, no difference was noted between the groups in the incidence of positive margins, local recurrence, or metastatic recurrence at a mean follow-up of 12.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: HAL provides a safe, reproducible, and minimally invasive technique to remove large renal tumors and renal tumors in the obese.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗

PubMed2002

Laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors.

BACKGROUND: The maximum size of adrenal tumors that should be removed with a laparoscopic approach is controversial. It has been suggested that laparoscopic adrenalectomy is appropriate only for adrenal tumors < 6 cm in size. We report our experience with laparoscopic adrenalectomy in patients with adrenal tumors of > or =6 cm compared with patients with smaller tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients who had a laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Patients were considered candidates for laparoscopic adrenalectomy if their computed tomography (CT) scan showed a well-encapsulated tumor confined to the adrenal gland. RESULTS: Sixty laparoscopic adrenalectomies were performed in 53 patients. Twelve of the adrenalectomies (20%) were for tumors that were > or =6 cm (median, 8 cm; range, 6 to 12 cm). There have been no local or regional recurrences, but one patient with adrenocortical carcinoma developed pulmonary metastases. When the 12 patients with large tumors were compared with the 36 patients with tumors < 6 cm, the median operative time (190 vs. 180 minutes; P =.32), operative blood loss (100 vs. 50 mL; P =.53), and postoperative hospital stay (2 vs. 2 days; P = 1.0) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The size of an adrenal tumor should not be the primary factor in determining whether a laparoscopic adrenalectomy should be performed. Large adrenal tumors that are confined to the adrenal gland on CT can be removed with a laparoscopic approach.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗

PubMed2002

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the New York-Presbyterian Hospital experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the standard technique for the surgical removal of the adrenal gland. The advantages of the laparoscopic approach include shorter length of stay (LOS), a decrease in postoperative pain, faster return to preoperative activity level, improved cosmesis, and reduced complications. We report our experience with laparoscopic adrenalectomy via a lateral transperitoneal approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1993 and April 2001, we performed 100 lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomies in 91 patients. In 82 cases, the adrenalectomy was unilateral and in the other 9, it was bilateral. A total of 59 left-sided lesions and 41 right-sided lesions were removed. The indications for surgery were Cushing's syndrome (24), aldosteronoma (34), pheochromocytoma (17), nonfunctioning adenoma (13), Carney's syndrome (1), and a metastasis from colon cancer (1) RESULTS: The overall success rate was 98%. Complications occurred in the two patients who required open conversion. In addition, three patients suffered pneumothoraces because of direct iatrogenic injury to the diaphragm during laparoscopic dissection. One additional patient suffered a splenic laceration. Operative time, blood loss, and intraoperative complications were similar in the laparoscopic and open surgery control group (N = 32). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is technically feasible and reproducible. The lateral transperitoneal technique offers distinct advantages to the laparoscopist, including better visibility of familiar anatomic landmarks, easy access to other organ systems, the use of gravity to retract the spleen and liver, and a wide exposure, which allows removal of large adrenal lesions.

Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Expert videotape analysis and critiquing benefit laparoscopic skills training of urologists.

INTRODUCTION: Teaching laparoscopic skills has become the focus of the latest generation of hands-on laparoscopic courses. METHODS: Thirty-four practicing urologists, ages 31 to 61 years (mean, 46.6 years) with laparoscopic experience (range, 0 to 200, mean, 27.6 cases), 32 of whom had taken prior American Urological Association (AUA) laparoscopy courses, participated in an AUA-sponsored hands-on laparoscopic skills course over a 2-day period in August 2002 or March 2003. They all took a knowledge assessment examination and performed standardized tasks (rope passing, ring placement, and laparoscopic suturing and knot tying) at the beginning and the end of the course with a videotape analysis and critique. Prior to the repeat-skills assessment, each participant was individually critiqued and instructed based on a videotape review of their initial performance. The urologists also participated in a porcine laboratory and a pelvic trainer session totaling 6 hours between skills assessments. None of the participants had performed significant laparoscopic suturing prior to the course. RESULTS: Using Wilcoxon's signed rank test, the participants improved from a mean of 119.32 seconds to 98.36 seconds with the rope pass (P = 0.0001), and with the ring placement from a mean of 9.70/minute to 12.09/minute (P = 0.0001). All participants had significantly fewer false passes (mean, 9.35 compared with 5.21) during repeat skills assessments (P = 0.0001). Participants improved from 0.54 sutures/minute to 1.22 sutures/ minute following the video critique and practice (P = 0.0001). Degree of laparoscopic experience (number of cases), age of the urologist, and precourse knowledge (examination score) had no significant bearing on results in the initial skills assessment or in the improvement of task time (Spearman correlation coefficients). CONCLUSION: Urologists with some laparoscopic experience (mean 27.6 cases) can improve laparoscopic skills using mentored videotape analysis and experience gained from a 2-day hands-on course. Prior knowledge, degree of experience, and urologist age had no significant bearing on performance in this setting.

Adult↗