Biomedical subjects

Steven O Stapel

Publications and source records attributed to Steven O Stapel.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

IgE testing in capillary blood.

Serologic IgE testing is generally performed using serum, obtained by venepuncture. We tested whether paper-absorbed and eluted capillary blood, obtained by a less invasive method (finger prick) could be used for allergy testing in young children. This was performed by comparative IgE testing, using paper-absorbed blood/serum and serum. Practical applicability of the procedure was tested by assaying paper-absorbed and eluted blood, obtained from 640 children with complaints of prolonged coughing, for IgE to airborne allergens. We found that IgE testing, using paper-absorbed/eluted material and serum yields virtually identical results (mean ratio for positive samples: 1.01, 95% confidence interval: 0.58-1.75). Blood spot testing revealed that sensitization to inhalant allergens is not uncommon in preschool children (13% positive radioallergosorbent test [RAST] tests), which means that this procedure is a useful method for assaying allergic sensitization in children.

Blood Specimen Collection↗

PubMed2004

Coughing in pre-school children in general practice: when are RAST's for inhalation allergy indicated?

To identify patterns of clinical history associated with extreme (high or low) probabilities of allergic sensitization in coughing children so as to restrict allergy testing to those with an intermediate probability of sensitization. A total of 752 children, aged 1-4, visiting their GPs for coughing (>or=5 days), were tested for IgE-antibodies to house dust mite, cat and dog [RadioAllergoSorbent Test (RAST)]. Parents completed a questionnaire on family history of atopy, breastfeeding, smoking, pets, and floor covering. Data of 640 children could be analyzed, 83 (13%) were IgE-positive. In a logistic regression analysis, a scoring formula for the prediction of being IgE-positive was constructed using variables from the patient's history. Significant contributors for sensitization were: age (3-4 yr), infantile eczema, positive family history of mite-allergy, sibling(s) with pollen-allergy, and smoking by parents. If only one of these characteristics is present, the probability of sensitization is < 25%. In such cases watchful waiting may be preferred over allergy testing. In other cases, a negative RAST may help to exclude sensitization, whereas a positive RAST helps to establish the diagnosis. Thus, acting on clinical history alone may save approximately 80% of RAST's. Patient history-derived information contributes to distinguishing children who are at low risk for sensitization to house dust mite, cat, and dog. The scoring formula may help GPs to identify children with a low probability of being sensitized. This may form the basis for watchful waiting. In others, allergy testing may be useful to gain more diagnostic certainty.

Allergens↗

PubMed2002

IgE to Bet v 1 and profilin: cross-reactivity patterns and clinical relevance.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with pollen allergy often have IgE against plant-derived foods. This can be due to cross-reactive IgE against Bet v 1 and homologues, profilins, and/or cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to correlate sensitization to Bet v 1 and profilin with individual recognition patterns to plant foods and clinical relevance. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with pollen allergy and IgE against at least one plant-derived food were included in the study. Adverse reactions to plant-derived foods were documented by using standardized interviews. Skin prick tests were performed for pollen (grass, birch, and mugwort) and 14 plant-derived foods. In addition, recombinant (r) Bet v 1 and rBet v 2 (profilin) were tested intracutaneously. Specific IgE against the abovementioned allergens were determined by means of RAST. Cross-reactivity was studied by means of RAST inhibition. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of patients were sensitized to Bet v 1, and 71% were sensitized to profilin. Profilin was associated with a higher number of positive RAST results to plant-derived foods than Bet v 1. In contrast, Bet v 1 was associated with more positive skin prick test responses and more food-related symptoms. Sensitization to Bet v 1 was associated with IgE against apple, hazelnut, and peach, whereas sensitization to profilin was associated with positive RAST results to all investigated plant-derived foods except apple, peach, and melon. CONCLUSIONS: IgE antibodies against Bet v 1 have a more limited spectrum of cross-reactivity than those against profilin, but they frequently give rise to clinically relevant cross-reactivities to food. In analogy to anticarbohydrate IgE, cross-reactive IgE against food profilins have no or very limited clinical relevance.

Adolescent↗