PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Steven W Siegel

Publications and source records attributed to Steven W Siegel.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: One institution's 11-year experience.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to review our institution's 11-year experience with SNS for the treatment of refractory voiding dysfunction. Dating back to 1993, it covers a span of time which describes the evolution of SNS as it includes PNE trials, non-tined (bone-anchored or fascial-anchored) leads, percutaneous tined leads with two-staged procedures, and even percutaneous pudendal trials. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on SNS patients who received an implantable pulse generator (IPG) in our practice from 12/1993 to 12/2004. After Institutional Review Board approval, consents for chart review were obtained from 104 patients, representing 44% of this neuromodulatory patient population. RESULTS: Of our population, 87% were female and 13% were male. Average age at implant was 50 years +/- 13.4 years. Duration of symptoms before implantation was 116 months (range 9-600 months). Eighty percent were implanted for a predominant complaint of urinary urgency and frequency (U/F). Overall, 22% had U/F only, 38% had concomitant urge incontinence (UI), and 20% had concomitant mixed incontinence (MI). Twenty percent were treated for non-obstructive urinary retention (UR), with half of these associated with a neurogenic etiology. Additionally, 46.2% had pelvic pain, 58.6% had bowel complaints, and 51% reported sexual dysfunction. In patients with U/F, mean voiding parameters as described by pre-implant voiding diaries revealed the following: 12.4 (+/-5.1) voids per 24 hr; 2.3 (+/-1.8) voids per night; 5.0 (+/-4.7) leaks per 24 hr; and 2.3 (+/-2.6) pads per 24 hr. Statistically significant improvements post-implantation were noted with mean decreases in the following: 4.3 voids per 24 hr; 1.0 void per night; 4.4 leaks per 24 hr; and 2.3 pads per 24 hr (all P < 0.05). In the UR group a statistically significant improvement post-implantation was noted only in voids per night, with a mean decrease of 0.8 (P < 0.05). With a mean follow up of 22 months (range 3-162 months), sustained subjective improvement was >50%, >80%, and >90% in 69%, 50%, and 35% of patients, respectively. By quality of life survey, 60.5% of patients were satisfied and 16.1% were dissatisfied with current urinary symptoms. Only 13% (14 patients) abandoned therapy, making up a significant portion of those dissatisfied with current urinary symptoms. Good overall lead durability was seen (mean 22 months, range 1-121 months), with the first successful lead proving to be the most durable (mean 28 months, range 1.4-120 months). Lead durability decreased progressively with subsequent trials. Overall, 53% of patients experienced at least one reportable event (RE) attributable to either lead or IPG. A total of 126 REs were noted, with 97% mild-to-moderate in severity. REs included lack of efficacy, loss of efficacy, infection, hematoma/seroma, migration, pain, undesirable change in sensation, and device malfunction. In this population, 47.1% of leads were tined while 52.9% were non-tined. Tined leads had an overall lower RE rate as compared to non-tined leads: 28% and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SNS is an effective method for treating certain types of voiding dysfunction. Although 53% of patients experienced at least one RE, 97% were mild-to-moderate and did not appear to affect the continued use of this therapy. With improved technology, such as percutaneous tined leads, the RE rate is decreasing. Further analyses of subsets of this population are currently underway.

Adult↗

Selecting patients for sacral nerve stimulation.

Patient selection for SNS remains empiric. A key is to think of voiding dysfunctions in terms of voiding behaviors and pelvic floor muscle function, not organ-based labels. Patients who have intractable urinary frequency, urgency, urge incontinence, or idiopathic urinary retention should be considered as prime candidates. Evidence of high-tone pelvic floor muscle dysfunction also may be demonstrated on routine physical examination, as well as diagnostic studies such as pelvic-floor EMG. A successful trial stimulation remains the best indicator for patient selection, and should be used as a routine diagnostic test among patients who have chronic, life-altering voiding complaints that cannot be resolved adequately by medications or behavioral interventions.

Electric Stimulation Therapy↗

Treatment of stress incontinence with the SPARC sling: intraoperative and early complications of 445 patients.

OBJECTIVES: To review our series of 445 patients to obtain safety and early outcome information regarding use of the SPARC mid-urethral sling. The SPARC mid-urethral sling is commonly used to treat stress urinary incontinence. The SPARC technique involves passage of the trocars from an initial suprapubic approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all SPARC slings performed from the first procedure in August 2001 through December 2003. The Urogenital Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short-form surveys were mailed to the patients. All SPARC procedures were performed on an outpatient basis unless the patient was undergoing a concurrent procedure. RESULTS: The average patient age was 60 years. Concurrent prolapse repair and/or hysterectomy were performed in 97 patients (22%). The mean time from surgery to questionnaire response was 15 months. Ninety-one percent would undergo the procedure again, and 84% would recommend the SPARC to a friend. One patient was admitted postoperatively for a rectus hematoma. Another presented after 3 days with abdominal pain resulting from a small bowel perforation. Sling release was performed in 19 patients (4.3%) because of large postvoid residual urine volume or obstructive voiding symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The SPARC mid-urethral sling is an effective outpatient surgical procedure to treat stress urinary incontinence.

Female↗