PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stuart A Grant

Publications and source records attributed to Stuart A Grant.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Regional anesthesia in hip surgery.

UNLABELLED: Historically, general anesthesia has been the "gold standard" for surgeons and patients when major hip surgery is being done. The recent introductions of improved techniques and catheters for continuous peripheral nerve blocks have made regional anesthesia more attractive to patients and surgeons. We focus on current trends and future directions in perioperative pain management for major orthopaedic procedures done on the hip. The use of epidural or spinal anesthesia during major hip surgery has been linked to a reduced risk of perioperative complications like deep venous thrombosis, less deterioration of cerebral and pulmonary functions in patients who are at high risk for complications, and overall reduced blood loss. In addition, continuous peripheral nerve blocks showed effective and safe postoperative pain control, allowing for lower opioids consumption, improved and earlier rehabilitation, and high patient satisfaction. Accurate patient selection and patient education are fundamental for the success of any regional anesthesia technique. Modern regional anesthesia for major hip surgery includes the use of a single shot and continuous epidural injections, single-shot and continuous spinal injection, continuous lumbar plexus blockade, and continuous peripheral blockade of the femoral and sciatic nerves. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks represent an adjunctive, effective, and safe technique for postoperative pain control after total hip arthroplasty. Future directions in postoperative pain control include the creation of a comprehensive system that supervises the use of continuous peripheral nerve blocks outside the acute inpatient setting for few days following the surgical procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level V (expert opinion). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗
PubMed2004

Dexmedetomidine infusion for sedation during fiberoptic intubation: a report of three cases.

We report three patients undergoing cervical spine surgery who required awake fiberoptic intubation, and in whom sedation was provided using a dexmedetomidine infusion. Dexmedetomidine was used to provide a moderate level of sedation without causing respiratory distress or hemodynamic instability during fiberoptic intubation. Conditions for intubation were acceptable in all three patients after co-administration of topical anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine may serve as a useful adjunct for this procedure. The anesthetic management and anesthetic implications of using dexmedetomidine infusions for awake fiberoptic intubation are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

The Holy Grail: long-acting local anaesthetics and liposomes.

The ability to provide an extended duration of analgesia of days following a single injection without the need for catheters, pumps and infusion systems would be a great benefit in acute and chronic pain. Exciting progress is being made in our ability to combine local anaesthetics with liposomes and polymer microspheres. These interesting formulations in animal models have allowed up to 4 days of analgesia. Their use clinically will be a great advance which could possibly occur in the near future.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Development of a standardized peripheral nerve block procedure note form.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the tremendous growth of peripheral nerve blocks, no standard format exists to document their performance. Our objective was to create a peripheral nerve block form based on key elements of literature evidence and on our own group consensus. RESULTS: We describe the process and results of our multi-institutional effort to construct a standardized peripheral nerve block procedure form. CONCLUSION: A form was developed to help meet the medical, legal, and billing requirements of documentation consistent with the performance of peripheral nerve block.

Humans↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Continuous versus single-injection lumbar plexus blocks: comparison of the effects on morphine use and early recovery after total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Continuous lumbar plexus infusion of local anesthetic after total knee arthroplasty has been shown to improve analgesia and early recovery as compared with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine. Any benefit of an infusion over a single-injection lumbar plexus block has not been directly shown however. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, 32 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: 0.1% levobupivacaine infusion or saline infusion. Preoperatively, all patients received a lumbar plexus block with 25 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine using a posterior approach with a catheter left in situ, a sciatic nerve block with 15 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine, and a spinal anesthetic. At the end of surgery, 0.1% levobupivacaine or saline was infused into the catheter at 10 mL/h for 48 hours. All patients also received PCA morphine. The primary endpoint was morphine use from the PCA machine. Secondary endpoints included pain scores, day of first postoperative mobilization, and nausea. RESULTS: Patients receiving the levobupivacaine infusion used significantly less morphine than those receiving saline (19 mg [interquartile range (IQR) 8.5-29.5] vs 32 mg [IQR 23.5-53.0], P = .04) and also mobilized earlier postoperatively (day 1 or 2 [levobupivacaine] vs day 2 or 3 [saline], P = .001). Pain scores were similar. CONCLUSION: Postoperative infusion of local anesthetic around the lumbar plexus reduces morphine requirement and improves early recovery after total knee arthroplasty as compared with a single-injection block.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Severe phantom leg pain in an amputee after lumbar plexus block.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the onset of phantom leg pain in an amputee with the performance of a lumbar plexus block and the subsequent alleviation after the performance of a sciatic nerve block. CASE REPORT: A 72-year-old American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status III woman presented for left total hip arthroplasty. Her history was significant for a left below the knee amputation. Since the amputation she had suffered from intermittent phantom leg pain. A lumbar plexus block was performed for postoperative pain management. After the lumbar plexus block, the patient experienced severe pain radiating to the left phantom foot. Because of the severity of the phantom pain, a sciatic nerve block was performed. The phantom leg pain resolved within 5 minutes. The intraoperative care under general anesthesia was uneventful. After surgery the patient had continued blockade in both nerve distributions with excellent analgesia. Full recovery of the lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve function was present on the first postoperative day. CONCLUSION: The temporal relationship between the onset of the phantom leg pain and the lumbar plexus block suggests a causal relationship. In this case, it appears that ongoing peripheral input from the lumbar plexus may have been sufficient for the tonic inhibition of phantom pain in the sciatic distribution. The immediate reactivation of the phantom pain and its subsequent relief suggests dynamic processing of peripheral inputs by central neurons, which apparently is rapid and reversible in some cases of phantom pain.

Adrenergic Agonists↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Central nervous system toxicity following the administration of levobupivacaine for lumbar plexus block: A report of two cases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Central nervous system and cardiac toxicity following the administration of local anesthetics is a recognized complication of regional anesthesia. Levobupivacaine, the pure S(-) enantiomer of bupivacaine, was developed to improve the cardiac safety profile of bupivacaine. We describe 2 cases of grand mal seizures following accidental intravascular injection of levobupivacaine. CASE REPORT: Two patients presenting for elective orthopedic surgery of the lower limb underwent blockade of the lumbar plexus via the posterior approach. Immediately after the administration of levobupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 2.5 microgram/mL, the patients developed grand mal seizures, despite negative aspiration for blood and no clinical signs of intravenous epinephrine administration. The seizures were successfully treated with sodium thiopental in addition to succinylcholine in 1 patient. Neither patient developed signs of cardiovascular toxicity. Both patients were treated preoperatively with beta-adrenergic antagonist medications, which may have masked the cardiovascular signs of the unintentional intravascular administration of levobupivacaine with epinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: Although levobupivacaine may have a safer cardiac toxicity profile than racemic bupivacaine, if adequate amounts of levobupivacaine reach the circulation, it will result in convulsions. Plasma concentrations sufficient to result in central nervous system toxicity did not produce manifestations of cardiac toxicity in these 2 patients.

Aged↗