PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Stuart C Mangel

Publications and source records attributed to Stuart C Mangel.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Dendritic compartmentalization of chloride cotransporters underlies directional responses of starburst amacrine cells in retina.

The mechanisms in the retina that generate light responses selective for the direction of image motion remain unresolved. Recent evidence indicates that directionally selective light responses occur first in the retina in the dendrites of an interneuron, i.e., the starburst amacrine cell, and that these responses are highly sensitive to the activity of Na-K-2Cl (NKCC) and K-Cl (KCC), two types of chloride cotransporter that determine whether the neurotransmitter GABA depolarizes or hyperpolarizes neurons, respectively. We show here that selective blockade of the NKCC2 and KCC2 cotransporters located on starburst dendrites consistently hyperpolarized and depolarized the starburst cells, respectively, and greatly reduced or eliminated their directionally selective light responses. By mapping NKCC2 and KCC2 antibody staining on these dendrites, we further show that NKCC2 and KCC2 are preferentially located in the proximal and distal dendritic compartments, respectively. Finally, measurements of the GABA reversal potential in different starburst dendritic compartments indicate that the GABA reversal potential at the distal dendrite is more hyperpolarized than at the proximal dendrite due to KCC2 activity. These results thus demonstrate that the differential distribution of NKCC2 on the proximal dendrites and KCC2 on the distal dendrites of starburst cells results in a GABA-evoked depolarization and hyperpolarization at the NKCC2 and KCC2 compartments, respectively, and underlies the directionally selective light responses of the dendrites. The functional compartmentalization of interneuron dendrites may be an important means by which the nervous system encodes complex information at the subcellular level.

Amacrine Cells↗

Electrical feedback in the cone pedicle: a computational analysis.

One of the fundamental principles of neuroscience is that direct electrical interactions between neurons are not possible without specialized electrical contacts, gap junctions, because the transmembrane resistance of neurons is typically much higher than the resistance of the adjacent extracellular space. However it has been proposed that in the retina direct electrical interactions between cones and second-order neurons occur due to the specific morphology of the cone synaptic terminal. This electrical mechanism could potentially explain the phenomenon of "negative feedback" from horizontal cells to cones and the recent finding that the tips of horizontal cell dendrites contain hemichannels has rekindled interest in the idea. We quantitatively evaluated the possibility that hemichannels and/or glutamate channels mediate electrical feedback from horizontal cells to cones. The calculations show that it is unlikely that an electrical mechanism plays a significant functional role because 1) the necessity of preserving adequate cone-to-horizontal-cell synaptic transmission limits the extracellular space resistance and the horizontal-cell dendritic transmembrane resistances to values at which the effectiveness of electrical feedback is very low and its electrical effect on the cone presynaptic membrane is negligible, 2) electrical feedback is most effective in the dark and weaker during light adaptation, which contradicts the experimental data, and 3) electrical negative feedback is associated with much stronger electrical positive feedback from horizontal cells to cones, a phenomenon that has never been reported. Therefore it is likely that negative feedback from horizontal cells to cones is chemical in nature.

Animals↗

A circadian clock and light/dark adaptation differentially regulate adenosine in the mammalian retina.

Although the purine adenosine acts as an extracellular neuromodulator in the mammalian CNS in both normal and pathological conditions and regulates sleep, the regulation of extracellular adenosine in the day and night is incompletely understood. To determine how extracellular adenosine is regulated, rabbit neural retinas were maintained by superfusion at different times of the regular light/dark and circadian cycles. The adenosine level in the superfusate, representing adenosine overflow from the retinas, and the adenosine level in retinal homogenates, representing adenosine content, were measured using HPLC with fluorescence detection in the absence or presence of blockers of adenosine transport and/or extracellular adenosine synthesis. We report that darkness, compared with illumination, increases the level of extracellular adenosine, and that a circadian clock also increases extracellular adenosine at night. In addition, we show that the darkness-evoked increase in the level of extracellular adenosine results primarily from an increase in the conversion of extracellular ATP into adenosine, but that the clock-induced increase at night results primarily from an increase in the accumulation of intracellular adenosine. We also show that a slightly hypoxic state increases adenosine content and overflow to an extent similar to that of the clock. Our findings demonstrate that the extracellular level of adenosine in the mammalian retina is differentially regulated by a circadian clock and the lighting conditions and is maximal at night under dark-adapted conditions. We conclude that adenosine is a neuromodulator involved in both circadian clock and dark-adaptive processes in the vertebrate retina.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Retinal pH reflects retinal energy metabolism in the day and night.

The extracellular pH of living tissue in the retina and elsewhere in the brain is lower than the pH of the surrounding milieu. We have shown that the pH gradient between the in vitro retina and the superfusion solution is regulated by a circadian (24-h) clock so that it is smaller in the subjective day than in the subjective night. We show here that the circadian changes in retinal pH result from a clock-mediated change in the generation of H+ that accompanies energy production. To demonstrate this, we suppressed energy metabolism and recorded the resultant reduction in the pH difference between the retina and superfusate. The magnitude of the reduction in the pH gradient correlated with the extent of energy metabolism suppression. We also examined whether the circadian-induced increase in acid production during the subjective night results from an increase in energy metabolism or from the selective activation of glycolysis compared with oxidative phosphorylation. We found that the selective suppression of either oxidative phosphorylation or glycolysis had almost identical effects on the dynamics and extent of H+ production during the subjective day and night. Thus the proportion of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation is maintained the same regardless of circadian time, and the pH difference between the tissue and superfusion solution can therefore be used to evaluate total energy production. We conclude that circadian clock regulation of retinal pH reflects circadian regulation of retinal energy metabolism.

Animals↗

Cation--chloride cotransporters mediate neural computation in the retina.

The ability of directionally selective (DS) retinal ganglion cells to respond selectively to stimulus motion in one direction is a classic unresolved example of computation in a local neural circuit. Recent evidence indicates that DS responses occur first in the retina in the dendrites of starburst amacrine cells (interneurons presynaptic to the ganglion cells). We report that the directional responses of starburst-cell dendrites and DS ganglion cells are highly sensitive to the polarity of the transmembrane chloride gradient. Reducing the transmembrane chloride gradient by ion substitution or by blocking the K-Cl cotransporter resulted in the starburst cells responding equally to light moving in opposite directions. Conversely, increasing the chloride gradient by blocking the Na-K-Cl cotransporter eliminated responses to light moving in either direction. Moreover, in each case, blocking the chloride cotransporters or reducing the transmembrane chloride gradient eliminated the directional responses of DS ganglion cells in a manner opposite that of the starburst cells. These results indicate that chloride cotransporters play a key role in the generation of direction selectivity and that the directional responses of starburst cells and DS ganglion cells are exquisitely sensitive to the chloride equilibrium potential. The findings further suggest that the directional responses of DS ganglion cells are mediated in part by the directional release of gamma-aminobutyric acid from starburst dendrites and that the asymmetric distribution of the two cotransporters along starburst-cell dendrites mediates direction selectivity. A model of direction selectivity in the retina that incorporates these and other findings is discussed.

Animals↗

Absence of circadian clock regulation of horizontal cell gap junctional coupling reveals two dopamine systems in the goldfish retina.

In fish and other vertebrate retinas, although dopamine release is regulated by both light and an endogenous circadian (24-hour) clock, light increases dopamine release to a greater extent than the clock. The clock increases dopamine release during the subjective day so that D2-like receptors are activated. It is not known, however, whether the retinal clock also activates D1 receptors, which display a much lower sensitivity to dopamine in intact tissue. Because activation of the D1 receptors on fish cone horizontal (H1) cells uncouples the gap junctions between the cells, we studied whether the clock regulates the extent of biocytin tracer coupling in the goldfish retina. Tracer coupling between H1 cells was extensive under dark-adapted conditions (low scotopic range) and similar in the subjective day, subjective night, day, and night. An average of approximately 180 cells were coupled in each dark-adapted condition. However, bright light stimulation or application of the D1 agonist SKF38393 (10 microM) dramatically reduced H1 cell coupling. The D2 agonist quinpirole (1 microM) or application of the D1 antagonist SCH23390 (10 microM) and/or the D2 antagonist spiperone (10 microM) had no effect on H1 cell coupling in dark-adapted retinas. These observations demonstrate that H1 cell gap junctional coupling and thus D1 receptor activity are not affected by endogenous dopamine under dark-adapted conditions. The results suggest that two different dopamine systems are present in the goldfish retina. One system is controlled by an endogenous clock that activates low threshold D2-like receptors in the day, whereas the second system is controlled by light and involves activation of higher threshold D1 receptors.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

A circadian clock in the fish retina regulates dopamine release via activation of melatonin receptors.

Although many biochemical, morphological and physiological processes in the vertebrate retina are controlled by a circadian (24 h) clock, the location of the clock and how the clock alters retinal function are unclear. For instance, several observations have suggested that dopamine, a retinal neuromodulator, may play an important role in retinal rhythmicity but the link between dopamine and a clock located within or outside the retina remains to be established. We found that endogenous dopamine release from isolated goldfish retinae cultured in continuous darkness for 56 h clearly exhibited a circadian rhythm with high values during the subjective day. The continuous presence of melatonin (1 nM) in the culture medium abolished the circadian rhythm of dopamine release and kept values constantly low and equal to the night-time values. The selective melatonin antagonist luzindole (1 microM) also abolished the dopamine rhythm but the values were high and equal to the daytime values. Melatonin application during the late subjective day introduced rod input and reduced cone input to fish cone horizontal cells, a state usually observed during the subjective night. In contrast, luzindole application during the subjective night decreased rod input and increased cone input. Prior application of dopamine or spiperone, a selective dopamine D(2)-like antagonist, blocked the above effects of melatonin and luzindole, respectively. These findings indicate that a circadian clock in the vertebrate retina regulates dopamine release by the activation of melatonin receptors and that endogenous melatonin modulates rod and cone pathways through dopamine-mediated D(2)-like receptor activation.

Animals↗

Dopamine mediates circadian clock regulation of rod and cone input to fish retinal horizontal cells.

A circadian (24-hour) clock regulates the light responses of fish cone horizontal cells, second order neurones in the retina that receive synaptic contact from cones and not from rods. Due to the action of the clock, cone horizontal cells are driven by cones in the day, but primarily driven by rods at night. We show here that dopamine, a retinal neurotransmitter, acts as a clock signal for the day by increasing cone input and decreasing rod input to cone horizontal cells. The amount of endogenous dopamine released from in vitro retinae was greater during the subjective day than the subjective night. Application of dopamine or quinpirole, a dopamine D(2)-like agonist, during the subjective night increased cone input and eliminated rod input to the cells, a state usually observed during the subjective day. In contrast, application of spiperone, a D(2)-like antagonist, or forskolin, an activator of adenylyl cyclase, during the subjective day reduced cone input and increased rod input. SCH23390, a D(1) antagonist, had no effect. Application of R(p)-cAMPS, an inhibitor of cAMP-dependent protein kinase, or octanol, an alcohol that uncouples gap junctions, during the night increased cone input and decreased rod input. Because D(2)-like receptors are on photoreceptor cells, but not horizontal cells, the results suggest that the clock-induced increase in dopamine release during the day activates D(2)-like receptors on photoreceptor cells. The resultant decrease in intracellular cyclic AMP and protein kinase A activation then mediates the increase in cone input and decrease in rod input.

Animals↗

Suppression by zinc of AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission in the retina.

Zinc is strikingly co-localized with glutamate-containing vesicles in the synaptic terminals of retinal photoreceptors, and it is thought to be co-released with glutamate onto postsynaptic neurons such as horizontal cells and bipolar cells. Here we examined exogenous zinc modulation of glutamate receptors on cultured retinal horizontal cells using patch-clamp recording and endogenous zinc effect on intact horizontal cells using intracellular recording techniques. Application of 3, 30, and 300 microM zinc reduced the whole cell peak current of response to 200 microM glutamate by 2, 30, and 56%, respectively. Zinc suppression of glutamate response persisted in the presence of 10 microM cyclothiazide (CTZ). Glutamate responses of outside-out patches were completely abolished by 30 microM 1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine (GYKI 52466), and the receptor desensitization was blocked by 30 microM CTZ, indicating that receptor target for the zinc action on horizontal cells is alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazoleproponic acid (AMPA) receptors. Zinc decreased the amplitude of outside-out patch peak current without an effect on either its 10-90% rise time or the rate of receptor desensitization. Dose-response curves for glutamate show that zinc reduced the maximal current evoked by glutamate and increased EC(50) from 50 +/- 3 to 70 +/- 6 microM without changing the Hill coefficient. Chelation of endogenous zinc with 1 mM Ca-EDTA depolarized horizontal cells in the intact retina by 3 mV, consistent with relief of the partial glutamate receptor inhibition by zinc. Overall, the results describe a unimodal form of zinc modulation of AMPA-type glutamate receptor responses not previously described in native neuronal preparations and a novel role for endogenous zinc in modulating neurotransmission.

Animals↗