Biomedical subjects

Sue Jordan

Publications and source records attributed to Sue Jordan.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Introducing a nutrition screening tool: an exploratory study in a district general hospital.

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised that patients' nutrition is a neglected aspect of care. Accordingly, 'nutrition screening tools' have been devised to ensure that all patients are assessed by nurses and, where appropriate, referred to dieticians. The tool adopted in our hospital was the 'Nursing Nutritional Screening Tool'. AIM: To investigate the impact of this screening tool on: nutrition-related nursing documentation; patient care at mealtimes; dietician referral. METHODS: This study was conducted on two similar general medical wards in a United Kingdom (UK) district general hospital, with the help of staff and patients (n = 175) admitted during two study periods, May 1999 and January 2000. Data were collected over 28 days before and after introduction of the screening tool on one of the wards. For both wards, in each stage of the study, data were collected b: review of patients' notes, non-participant observations of mealtimes. Frequencies of dietician referral and documentation of weight were compared by cross-tabulations and chi2 tests. Nine months later, the findings were discussed with ward sisters in a group interview. FINDINGS: Introduction of the screening tool impacted on the process but not the outcomes of screening. Use of the screening tool increased the frequency of nutrition-related documentation: the proportion of patients with weights recorded increased on the intervention ward (P < 0.001), and decreased on the comparator ward. Frequency of dietician referral decreased on both wards, but differences were statistically insignificant. There was no observable change in patient care at mealtimes. The nurses in charge of the wards felt that introduction of the screening tool had raised awareness of nutrition-related care. CONCLUSIONS: Meeting patients' nutritional needs is a complex aspect of care which may benefit from introduction of structured guidelines. However, the potential of screening tools to improve care is limited by diverse factors, which warrant further exploration.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Minimizing side-effects: the clinical impact of nurse-administered 'side-effect' checklists.

BACKGROUND: For those with chronic illness, the adverse effects of medication are important causes of morbidity and distress which may not always receive due attention. Guidelines and checklists may be one strategy to focus professionals' attention on long-term problems. Therefore, client-centred 'side-effect' evaluation checklists were developed to be administered and actioned by nurses. AIM: The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical impact of these checklists on long-term users of antipsychotic medication. METHODS: This study was undertaken with clients with enduring mental illness, in Community Mental Health Teams. In the first phase, 40 nurse-client interactions were observed. Following introduction of the evaluation checklists, 20 nurse-client interactions were observed with the checklists and 20 nurse-client interactions were observed for comparison. In addition, the views of professionals, service users and user groups on the value of the checklists were sought. FINDINGS: Amongst the 20 clients in the intervention group, the checklists highlighted several problems, two of which were urgent. In the intervention group, the mean number of problems actioned per client increased from 0.35 (range=0-4) with no checklists to 3 (range=0-6) with the checklists. The majority (51 of 59) of actions taken to alleviate adverse effects of medication concerned physical health problems. Nurses offered appropriate advice or encouraged clients to contact the relevant agencies. No such changes were observed in the comparator group. There were no differences between groups in the number of referrals to prescribers. IMPLICATIONS: The usefulness of the evaluation checklists for detecting unattended problems, in conjunction with the responses of service users, suggests that it may be clinically effective to establish procedures to systematically monitor people with serious mental illness for adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, larger studies are needed to confirm this.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Managing adverse drug reactions: an orphan task.

BACKGROUND: Nurse prescribing initiatives have potential to impact on medication management for long-term conditions. Over time, the adverse effects of medications become increasingly onerous. This 'side-effect burden' is particularly heavy for users of antipsychotic medication. Although consensus exists that strategies are needed to alleviate these problems, currently, they are not clearly the responsibility of any one professional group. AIM: This paper explores the introduction of nurse-administered evaluation checklists, in relation to nurse prescribing initiatives and division of professional responsibilities for medication management. METHODS: This was an observation study, with a quasi-experimental comparator group design, undertaken with clients receiving long-term antipsychotic medication. In both intervention and comparator groups, before and after introduction of evaluation checklists in the intervention group, 20 nurse-client interactions were observed. Problems actioned by the nurses, with and without the checklists, were compared. Stakeholders' views were sought concurrently. FINDINGS: Implementation of evaluation checklists increased the numbers of adverse effects detected and actioned by nurses. They also served to apportion aspects of medication management between nurses and medical prescribers. Most actions taken by nurses to alleviate adverse effects concerned clients' physical health and advice on health-promotion. However, the nurses' interventions would have been more effective had they been able to supply clients with certain medicines either by prescribing from the Nurse Prescribers' Formulary or issuing under Patient Group Directions. For some clients, ameliorating the adverse effects of medication would have involved changes to prescribed antipsychotic medication; here decisions were more equivocal. IMPLICATIONS: The identification of previously unattended problems, together with the views of service users, suggests that empowering nurses to address the 'care gaps' in medication management may benefit service users. The 'checklist evaluation' approach warrants further investigation, ideally in conjunction with nurse prescribing initiatives.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

The impact of part-time post-registration degrees on practice.

AIM: This study aimed to identify how graduates from part-time, post-registration degree courses in nursing and midwifery perceived that their practice had changed as a result of the knowledge and skills acquired on their courses. BACKGROUND: Despite increasing investment in continuing professional education and expansion of nursing roles, little work has been undertaken to assess the impact of graduates' skills on nursing care and clinical outcomes. METHOD: Postal questionnaires were used to survey all graduates of post-registration Bachelor's and Master's courses in nursing and midwifery from one institution in the United Kingdom (UK) (n=60). Respondents were asked to describe how they felt their graduate skills were used in practice and if this was influenced by any factors in the workplace. Data were analysed descriptively, and by content analysis. FINDINGS: Forty-three of 58 graduates contacted responded (74%). The majority (33/43, 77%) of respondents felt that their graduate skills were used in practice. Although most felt that their clinical practice had changed as a result of their degree studies, no practical examples of this were given, despite specific questioning. Many examples of academic and research skills acquired on the course were cited, which raises the question of whether the degree courses provided graduates with academic rather than clinical knowledge. There was ambivalence as to their perceptions of barriers in the workplace, which may have impeded the application of knowledge acquired on the courses. IMPLICATIONS: The clinical effectiveness of education initiatives depends on the learners, the course and the workplace. To maximize the benefits accruing to patients from continuing professional education and role expansion, further exploration of the contribution of higher education programmes to clinical practice is required.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Corticosteroids: implications for nursing practice.

Corticosteroids are essential in the management of various inflammatory conditions, but their adverse effects can be a problem. The authors describe the uses and effects of corticosteroids, and discuss the nursing role in minimising problems associated with their use.

Administration, Inhalation↗