PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sukanya Subramanian

Publications and source records attributed to Sukanya Subramanian.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Preprocedure patient values regarding sedation for colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Adherence rates for screening colonoscopy remain low. There are little data describing pre-colonoscopy patient concepts, values, and preferences for sedation during colonoscopy. In this study, we sought to investigate preprocedure patient values regarding sedation use for colonoscopy. METHODS: Questionnaires were administered to 210 consecutive outpatients presenting for colonoscopy. An unscaled visual analog scale was used to value each of eight statements relating to sedation. RESULTS: The statement receiving the highest valuation was "I don't want to feel any pain" (mean score, 82 +/- 21), followed by "I want to go to sleep and not wake up until the procedure is over" (mean score, 71 +/- 31), and "I want to be alert as soon as possible after the procedure" (mean score, 65 +/- 30). The statement receiving the lowest value was "I'd like to watch as much of the procedure as I can" (22 +/- 29). Patients who preferred to undergo colonoscopy without sedation were more likely to be men (P = 0.001) and more likely to have graduate or professional educational degrees (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that, on average, American patients place the highest valuation on experiencing no pain during colonoscopy, waking up promptly after the procedure, and for going to sleep and not waking up until the procedure is over. However, unsedated colonoscopy does appeal to a small minority of patients, primarily men with graduate educations.

Colonoscopy↗

Variable stiffness colonoscopes: do they offer a better examination?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review evaluates the most recent literature pertaining to variable stiffness colonoscopes in the context of previously published data. A total of 12 papers and abstracts were identified, 5 of which had appeared since April 2002, including 2 in abstract form. RECENT FINDINGS: The data on the impact of variable stiffness colonoscopes has been mixed with regard to cecal intubation rate, cecal insertion time, need for ancillary maneuvers, and patient acceptance. The literature suggests that variable stiffness may improve cecal intubation times among inexperienced examiners and patient acceptance during unsedated or mildly sedated colonoscopy. The only consistent finding appears to be a reduction in the need for ancillary maneuvers. SUMMARY: There is not yet any compelling evidence to support a dramatic improvement in technical performance of colonoscopy using variable stiffness colonoscopes.

Journal Article↗