Biomedical subjects

Sumit K Shah

Publications and source records attributed to Sumit K Shah.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Pulmonary nodule characterization: a comparison of conventional with quantitative and visual semi-quantitative analyses using contrast enhancement maps.

PURPOSE: To determine whether conventional nodule densitometry or analysis based on contrast enhancement maps of indeterminate lung nodules imaged with contrast-enhanced CT can distinguish benign from malignant lung nodules. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Thin section, contrast-enhanced CT (baseline, and post-contrast series acquired at 45, 90,180, and 360 s) was performed on 29 patients with indeterminate lung nodules (14 benign, 15 malignant). A thoracic radiologist identified the boundary of each nodule using semi-automated contouring to form a 3D region-of-interest (ROI) on each image series. The post-contrast series having the maximum mean enhancement was then volumetrically registered to the baseline series. The two series were subtracted volumetrically and the subtracted voxels were quantized into seven color-coded bins, forming a contrast enhancement map (CEM). Conventional nodule densitometry was performed to obtain the maximum difference in mean enhancement values for each nodule from a circular ROI. Three thoracic radiologists performed visual semi-quantitative analysis of each nodule, scoring each map for: (a) magnitude and (b) heterogeneity of enhancement throughout the entire volume of the nodule on a five-point scale. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted on these features to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy. Finally, 14 quantitative texture features were calculated for each map. A statistical analysis was performed to combine the 14 texture features to a single factor. ROC analysis of the derived aggregate factor was done as an indicator of malignancy. All features were analyzed for differences between benign and malignant nodules. RESULTS: Using 15 HU as a threshold, 93% (14/15) of malignant and 79% (11/14) of benign nodules demonstrated enhancement. The ROC curve when higher values of enhancement indicate malignancy was generated and area under the curve (AUC) was 0.76. The visually scored magnitude of enhancement was found to be less effective in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions, with an average AUC of 0.62. The visually scored pattern of enhancement was found to be more effective with an average AUC of 0.79. From the statistical analysis performed to combine the texture features to a single factor, the area under the ROC curve was 0.84. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that visual semi-quantitative and quantitative characterization of contrast enhancement patterns may potentially enhance the discrimination between benign and malignant nodules. Further studies and correlation with pathologic material will be important to better understand the potential interplay between CT enhancement features, host stromal elements, and neovascularity that may contribute to these patterns.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Solitary pulmonary nodule diagnosis on CT: results of an observer study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the performance of observers with different levels of experience in distinguishing between benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) on CT, and to determine the effects on interpretation of three different conditions: image data alone, the addition of clinical data, and the addition of output from a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 28 thin-section CT datasets of SPNs with proven diagnoses (15 malignant and 13 benign) were used to measure observer performance. Readers were categorized according to their experience and read the cases in random order. For each case readers were asked to assign a level of confidence on a scale from 0.0-1.0 (0.0 benign, 1.0 malignant) for the diagnosis of the nodule. Each reader scored the cases based on review of image data alone (phase 1), then with limited clinical data (phase 2), and finally with CAD output (phase 3). To assess performance, multiple reader multiple case (MRMC) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used. RESULTS: 2 thoracic radiologists, 1 thoracic radiology fellow, 2 nonthoracic radiologists, and 3 radiology residents read the cases. The average area under the ROC curve for all readers (A(z)) at each stage was 0.68, 0.75, and 0.81, for image data alone, with clinical data, and with CAD output respectively. The difference in performance between phases (2 and 3) and (1 and 3) was significantly different (P = 0.018 and P = 0.020). However, the difference between phases (1 and 2) was not significantly different (P = 0.155). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic performance increased significantly with the addition of CAD output. With further validation CAD output may play a significant role in SPN management.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗

PubMed2005

Computer-aided diagnosis of the solitary pulmonary nodule.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the utility of a computer-aided diagnosis in the task of differentiating malignant nodules from benign nodules based on single thin-section computed tomography image data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one thin-section computed tomography data sets of solitary pulmonary nodules with proven diagnoses (48 malignant and 33 benign) were contoured manually on a single representative slice by a thoracic radiologist (>10 years of experience). Two separate contours were created for each nodule, one including only the solid portion of the nodule and one including any ground-glass components. For each contour 75 features were calculated that measured the attenuation, shape, and texture of the nodule. These features were than input into a feature selection step and four different classifiers to determine if the diagnosis could be predicted from the feature vector. Training and testing was conducted in a resubstitution and leave-one-out fashion and performance was evaluated using ROC techniques. RESULTS: In a leave-one-out testing methodology the classifiers resulted with areas under the ROC curve (A(Z)) that ranged from 0.68 to 0.92. When evaluating with resubstitution the A(Z) ranged from 0.93 to 1.00. CONCLUSION: Computer-aided diagnosis has the potential to assist radiologists in the task of differentiating solitary pulmonary nodules and in the management of these patients.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

PubMed2005

Computer-aided lung nodule detection in CT: results of large-scale observer test.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The objective is to study the incremental effects of using a computer-aided lung nodule detection (CAD) system on the performance of a large pool of observers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A set of eight thin-section computed tomographic data sets with limited longitudinal coverage, containing a total of 22 lung nodules, was analyzed by using the automated nodule detection system. When applied to all eight cases, the CAD system alone achieved a detection rate of 86.4%, with 2.64 false-positive results per case. This study included 202 observers at a national radiology meeting: 39 thoracic radiologists, 95 non-thoracic radiologists, and 68 non-radiologists. Each participant read from one to eight cases in random order, first without and then with CAD system output available. Observer performance in nodule detection was measured before and after CAD was made available. Differences in performance of groups of observers before and after CAD were tabulated by mean, median, and SD in detection rate and number of false-positive results and tested by using nonparametric methods. RESULTS: In an analysis involving only the first randomly selected case read by all 202 participants, there were statistically significant increases in nodule detection rates and numbers of false-positive results for all types of observers. There was a significant difference in detection rates between radiologists and non-radiologists before CAD, but after CAD, there was no significant difference in detection rates between these observer types. In a second analysis involving 13 participants who read all eight cases, mean detection rates were 64.0% before CAD and 81.9% after CAD. Mean numbers of false-positive results were 0.144 per case before CAD and 0.173 after CAD. CONCLUSION: In a large observer study, use of a CAD system for nodule detection resulted in an incremental increase in detection rate, but also led to an increase in number of false-positive results. Also, CAD appears to be an equalizer of detection rates between observers of different levels of experience.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2005

Computer aided characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule using volumetric and contrast enhancement features.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the utility of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the task of differentiating malignant nodules from benign nodules based on quantitative features extracted from volumetric thin section CT image data acquired before and after the injection of contrast media. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 35 volumetric CT datasets of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) with proven diagnoses (19 malignant/16 benign) were contoured by a thoracic radiologist. All studies had at least a baseline series obtained without contrast media and at least one series following an intravenous contrast injection at 45, 90, 180, and 360 seconds. Two separate contours were created for each nodule: one including only the solid portion and another including the ground-glass component, if any, of the nodule. For each contour 31 features were calculated that measured the attenuation, shape, and enhancement of the nodule due to the injection of contrast. These features were input into a feature selection step and three different classifiers to determine if the diagnosis could be predicted from the resulting feature vector. In addition, observer input was introduced to two of the classifiers as an a priori probability of malignancy and the resulting performance was compared. Training and testing was conducted in a resubstitution and leave-one-out fashion and performance was evaluated using ROC analysis. RESULTS: In a leave-one-out testing methodology, the classifiers achieved areas under the ROC curves AZ that ranged from 0.69 to 0.92. A classifier based on logistic regression performed the best with an AZ of 0.92 while a classifier based on quadratic discriminant analysis performed the poorest (AZ, 0.69). The AZ increased when using a priori observer input in most cases reaching a maximum of 0.95. CONCLUSION: Based on this initial work with a limited number of nodules in our dataset, it appears that CAD using volumetric and contrast-enhanced data has the potential to assist radiologists in the task of differentiating solitary pulmonary nodules and in the management of these patients. Further studies with an increased number of patients are required to validate these results.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Database design and implementation for quantitative image analysis research.

Quantitative image analysis (QIA) goes beyond subjective visual assessment to provide computer measurements of the image content, typically following image segmentation to identify anatomical regions of interest (ROIs). Commercially available picture archiving and communication systems focus on storage of image data. They are not well suited to efficient storage and mining of new types of quantitative data. In this paper, we present a system that integrates image segmentation, quantitation, and characterization with database and data mining facilities. The paper includes generic process and data models for QIA in medicine and describes their practical use. The data model is based upon the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data hierarchy, which is augmented with tables to store segmentation results (ROIs) and quantitative data from multiple experiments. Data mining for statistical analysis of the quantitative data is described along with example queries. The database is implemented in PostgreSQL on a UNIX server. Database requirements and capabilities are illustrated through two quantitative imaging experiments related to lung cancer screening and assessment of emphysema lung disease. The system can manage the large amounts of quantitative data necessary for research, development, and deployment of computer-aided diagnosis tools.

Algorithms↗