PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sundip J Patel

Publications and source records attributed to Sundip J Patel.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Evaluation of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: influence of timing algorithm and heart rate.

Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), a measure of arterial stiffness, is determined from the time taken for the arterial pulse to propagate from the carotid to the femoral artery. Propagation time is measured variously from the foot of the waveform or point of maximum upslope. We investigated whether these methods give comparable values of PWV at rest, during beta-adrenergic stimulation, and pacing-induced tachycardia. In subjects at rest (n=43), values obtained using the foot-to-foot method (SphygmoCor system) were 1.7+/-0.75 m/s (mean+/-SD) greater than those obtained using the maximum slope (Complior system) at a mean value of 12 m/s. Isoprotenerol (0.5 to 1.5 microg/min; n=10), and pacing (in subjects with permanent pacemakers; n=11) increased heart rate but had differential effects on systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure. The increase in heart rate produced by isoprotenerol (18+/-3 bpm) and pacing (40 bpm) was associated with an increase in PWV measured using both systems (increases of 0.7+/-0.2 m/s and 0.9+/-0.2 m/s for SphygmoCor and Complior, respectively, during isoprotenerol and increases of 2.1+/-0.5 m/s and 1.1+/-0.2 m/s for SphygmoCor and Complior, respectively, during pacing, each P<0.001). Reanalysis of waveforms recorded from the Complior system using the foot-to-foot method produced similar values of PWV to those obtained with the SphygmoCor, confirming that the difference between these systems was attributable to the timing algorithm rather than other aspects of signal acquisition. Carotid-femoral PWV is critically dependent on the method used to determine propagation time, but this does not account for variation of PWV with heart rate.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed2003

Pressure wave reflection assessed from the peripheral pulse: is a transfer function necessary?

Synthesis of the aortic pressure waveform by application of a transfer function to the radial pulse allows the estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure and aortic augmentation index, an index of pressure wave reflection derived from the early systolic component of the waveform. The accuracy of this approach for determining the aortic augmentation index has been questioned, however, and it may be possible to derive similar information without using a transfer function. We compared aortic systolic blood pressure and the aortic augmentation index obtained from carotid and radial arteries with the use of transfer functions. We examined the correlation between the aortic augmentation index and a radial augmentation index obtained without use of a transfer function. Arterial tonometry (Sphygmocor) was performed in 84 subjects including healthy volunteers (n=30), subjects with essential hypertension (n=30), and patients with coronary artery disease (n=24). Effects of nitroglycerine and norepinephrine on aortic and radial augmentation index were examined in 12 healthy volunteers. Values of aortic systolic pressure obtained from radial and carotid arteries by using transfer functions were in acceptable agreement (R=0.98, difference=-0.9+/-4.6 mm Hg; mean+/-SD, n=84), but those of aortic augmentation index differed especially in control subjects (R=0.47, difference=-3.8+/-12.4%). Aortic augmentation index was, however, closely correlated with radial augmentation index (R=0.96, n=84). Nitroglycerine and norepinephrine produced parallel changes in the aortic and radial augmentation index. Our findings question the use of a transfer function to obtain the aortic augmentation index but suggest that similar information on central pressure wave reflection can be obtained directly from the radial pulse.

Adult↗