PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sunil Puria

Publications and source records attributed to Sunil Puria.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

The discordant eardrum.

At frequencies above 3 kHz, the tympanic membrane vibrates chaotically. By having many resonances, the eardrum can transmit the broadest possible bandwidth of sound with optimal sensitivity. In essence, the eardrum works best through discord. The eardrum's success as an instrument of hearing can be directly explained through a combination of its shape, angular placement, and composition. The eardrum has a conical asymmetrical shape, lies at a steep angle with respect to the ear canal, and has organized radial and circumferential collagen fiber layers that provide the scaffolding. Understanding the role of each feature in hearing transduction will help direct future surgical reconstructions, lead to improved microphone and loudspeaker designs, and provide a basis for understanding the different tympanic membrane structures across species. To analyze the significance of each anatomical feature, a computer simulation of the ear canal, eardrum, and ossicles was developed. It is shown that a cone-shaped eardrum can transfer more force to the ossicles than a flat eardrum, especially at high frequencies. The tilted eardrum within the ear canal allows it to have a larger area for the same canal size, which increases sound transmission to the cochlea. The asymmetric eardrum with collagen fibers achieves optimal transmission at high frequencies by creating a multitude of deliberately mistuned resonances. The resonances are summed at the malleus attachment to produce a smooth transfer of pressure across all frequencies. In each case, the peculiar properties of the eardrum are directly responsible for the optimal sensitivity of this discordant drum.

Animals↗

Intracochlear pressure and organ of corti impedance from a linear active three-dimensional model.

Intracochlear pressure and basilar membrane (BM) velocity are calculated from a physiologically based chinchilla cochlea model . The model includes three-dimensional viscous fluid and the pectinate zone of the elastic BM with dimensional and material property variation along its length. The passive response shows excellent agreement with measurement at high sound pressure levels. The active process is represented by adding the motility of the outer hair cells (OHCs) to the passive model with the feed-forward approximation of the organ of Corti (OC), as was done previously. The current model explains recent observations including: (1) agreement with characteristic frequency (CF)-to-place map, (2) CF shift in the active model, (3) BM displacement gain from OHC motility, (4) lower intracochlear pressure gain than BM displacement gain, and (5) OC impedance (Z(OC)).

Animals↗

Developing a physical model of the human cochlea using micro-fabrication methods.

Advances in micro-machining technology have provided the opportunity to explore possibilities of creating life-sized physical models of the cochlea. The physical model of the cochlea consists of two fluid-filled channels separated by an elastic partition. The partition is micro-machined from silicon and uses a 36-mm linearly tapered polyimide plate with a width of 100 microm at the basal end and 500 microm at the apex to represent the basilar membrane. Thicknesses from 1 to 5 microm have been fabricated. Discrete aluminum fibers (1.5 microm in width) are machined to create direction-dependent properties. A 0.5 x 0.5 mm opening represents the helicotrema. The fluid channels are machined from plexiglas using conventional machining methods. A magnet-coil system excites the fluid channel. Measurements on a model with thickness 4.75 microm show a velocity gain of 4 and phase of 3.5 pi radians at a location 23 mm from the base. Mathematical modeling using a 3-D formulation confirm the general characteristics of the measured response.

Auditory Perception↗

Middle ear cavity and ear canal pressure-driven stapes velocity responses in human cadaveric temporal bones.

Drive pressure to stapes velocity (V(st)) transfer function measurements are collected and compared for human cadaveric temporal bones with the drive pressure alternately on the ear canal (EC) and middle ear cavity (MEC) sides of the tympanic membrane (TM), in order to predict the performance of proposed middle-ear implantable acoustic hearing aids, as well as provide additional data for examining human middle ear mechanics. The chief finding is that, in terms of the V(st) response, MEC stimulation performs at least as well as EC stimulation below 8 kHz, provided that the EC is unplugged. Plugging the EC causes a reduced response for MEC drive below 2 kHz, due to a corresponding reduction of the pressure difference between the two sides of the TM. Between 8 and 11 kHz, the MEC drive transfer functions feature an approximately 17 dB drop in magnitude below the EC drive case, the cause of which remains unknown. The EC drive transfer functions reported here feature significantly less magnitude roll-off above 1 kHz than previous studies [with a slope of -2.3 vs -6.7 dB/octave for Aibara et al., Hear. Res. 152, 100-109 (2001)], and significantly more phase group delay (134 vs 62 micros for Aibara et al.).

Artifacts↗

Three approaches for estimating the elastic modulus of the tympanic membrane.

The function of the middle ear is to resolve the acoustic impedance mismatch between the air in the ear canal and the fluid of the inner ear. Without this impedance matching, very little acoustic energy would be absorbed into the cochlea. The first step in this process is the tympanic membrane (TM) converting sound in the ear canal into vibrations of the middle ear bones. Understanding how the TM manages its task so successfully over such a broad frequency range should lead to more satisfactory and less variable TM repairs (myringoplasty). In addition, understanding the mechanics of the TM is necessary to improve the coupling between ossicular prostheses and the TM. Mathematical models have played a central role in helping the research community understand the mechanics of the eardrum. However, all models require parameters as inputs. Unfortunately, most of the parameters needed for modeling the TM are not well known. In this work, several approaches for inferring the material properties of the TM are explored. First, constitutive modeling is used to estimate an elastic modulus based on the elastic modulus of collagen and experimentally observed fiber densities. Second, experimental tension and bending test results from the literature are re-interpreted using composite laminate theory. Lastly, dynamic measurements of the cat TM are used in conjunction with a composite shell model to bound the material parameters. Values from the literature, both measurement and modeling efforts, and from the present analysis are brought together to form a coherent picture of the TM's material properties. In the human, the data bound the elastic modulus between 0.1 and 0.3 GPa. In the cat, the data suggest a range of 0.1-0.4 GPa. These values are significantly higher than previous estimates.

Animals↗

Malleus-to-footplate ossicular reconstruction prosthesis positioning: cochleovestibular pressure optimization.

AIMS: To determine 1) the best position for hydroxylapatite malleus-to-footplate (MFP), ossicular replacement prosthesis (ORP) in reconstructed ears, and 2) whether preserving the stapes superstructure (SS), when present, has acoustic advantages. BACKGROUND: Positioning of the MFP-ORP head beneath the neck of the malleus may produce maximal force, whereas positioning beneath the manubrium of the malleus may produce the greatest displacement. It is not clear which is the optimal placement position. In addition, we look at the effect of the SS on sound transmission to the inner ear in ossicular reconstruction. METHODS: The ear-canal air pressure and vestibular hydro-pressure were measured in human cadaver temporal bones with incus intact, removed, and replaced with the MFP-ORP; the ORP head was placed at three different positions on the malleus (head, mid-manubrium, and umbo) while keeping its base at the center of stapes footplate with intact or removed stapes SS. The vestibular pressure ratio between the ear with intact incus and MFP-ORP reconstructed ear is defined as Lmfp, the loss caused by the prosthesis in relation to the normal ossicular chain. RESULTS: The mean magnitude of Lmfp, averaged in the important speech frequency region of 0.5 to 3 kHz, is approximately 7.8 dB at the neck with stapes SS. In comparison, mean magnitude of Lmfp for mid-manubrium without stapes SS is 15 dB (p = 0.04), and with the stapes SS it is 16 dB (p = 0.05), whereas at the umbo without SS it is 15 dB (p = 0.03). In the 8 kHz region, the mean magnitude of Lmfp is approximately 1 dB with the stapes SS intact and approximately 8.5 dB when it was removed (p < 0.09). CONCLUSION: There are significant physiologic advantages to placing the hydroxylapatite MFP-ORP beneath the neck of the malleus and preserving the SS.

Aged↗

Malleus-to-footplate versus malleus-to-stapes-head ossicular reconstruction prostheses: temporal bone pressure gain measurements and clinical audiological data.

HYPOTHESIS: Several clinical reports suggest that if the stapes superstructure is intact, ossicular reconstruction should be made to the stapes head rather than the footplate to achieve a better hearing outcome. To test this hypothesis, we compared the in situ mechanical performance of hydroxylapatite (HA) malleus-to-stapes-head (MSH) ossicular reconstruction prosthesis (ORP) with malleus-to-footplate (MFP) ORP, both manufactured by Project HEAR. BACKGROUND: ORPs are commonly used to replace a missing or deficient incus. However, hearing outcomes are highly variable, depending on the ORP material, design, surgical technique, and ORP positioning. METHODS: Cochleo-vestibular pressure measurements in human cadaveric temporal bones for the HA MFP ORP have been reported by Puria et al. (2005). In the present study, the ear canal pressure Pe and cochleovestibular pressure Pv were measured in cadaveric temporal bones with intact incus, removed incus, and MSH ORP reconstruction. The relative loss in gain, Lmsh, is defined as the ratio of Pv with reconstructed MSH ORP to intact incus and compared with Lmfp. A retrospective clinical audit of the pre- and postoperative audiologic results of patients who had undergone ossiculoplasty with either MSH or MFP ORP was conducted for comparison. RESULTS: For the 0.5 to 3 kHz frequency range, Lmsh magnitude is 6.2 dB lower than the Lmfp magnitude (p = 0.05). The retrospective audit of audiologic results after ossiculoplasty with either MSH or MFP ORP revealed a similar difference in gain between the two ORP designs with air-bone gap differences of 7.6 dB (p = 0.04) and air conduction threshold differences of 8.0 dB (p = 0.13) for these patients. CONCLUSION: The MFP ORP showed better average pressure gain compared with the MSH ORP across the speech frequencies. Surgeons performing ossiculoplasty with designs similar to Project HEAR HA ORPs, where there is direct columella-like connection between the malleus and stapes, should consider using the MFP ORP design to achieve a better postoperative audiologic result, even when the stapes superstructure is intact.

Aged↗

Basilar membrane and osseous spiral lamina motion in human cadavers with air and bone conduction stimuli.

It is generally accepted that bone conduction (BC) stimuli yield a traveling wave on the basilar membrane (BM) and hence stimulate the cochlea by the same mechanisms as normal air conduction (AC). The basis for this is the ability to cancel or mask a BC tone with an AC tone and the ability to generate two tone distortion products with a BC tone and an AC tone. The hypothesis is proposed that BC stimulates the BM not only through the hydrodynamics of the scala vestibuli and scala tympani, but also through osseous spiral lamina (OSL) vibrations. To test this hypothesis the BM and OSL response with AC as well as BC stimulation was measured with a laser Doppler vibrometer. Human temporal bones mounted on a shaker were used to record the velocities of the bone per se, the BM and the OSL. The measurements were then converted to relative BM and OSL velocities. The results from the basal turn of the cochlea show similar behavior with AC and BC stimulation. The motion of the OSL at the edge where it connects to the BM is in phase and is typically 6 dB lower than the BM motion. With BC stimulation, there is less phase accumulation in the OSL after the cochlea is drained; the OSL moves due to inertial forces and resonates at approximately 7 kHz. Inertial vibration of the OSL may partially contribute to the total response of BC sound, especially at the high frequencies, although current models of the cochlea assume a rigid OSL. The measurements reported here can be used to include a flexible OSL in cochlear models.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions.

Middle and inner ears from human cadaver temporal bones were stimulated in the forward direction by an ear-canal sound source, and in the reverse direction by an inner-ear sound source. For each stimulus type, three variables were measured: (a) Pec--ear-canal pressure with a probe-tube microphone within 3 mm of the eardrum, (b) Vst--stapes velocity with a laser interferometer, and (c) Pv--vestibule pressure with a hydrophone. From these variables, the forward middle-ear pressure gain (M1), the cochlear input impedance (Zc), the reverse middle-ear pressure gain (M2), and the reverse middle-ear impedance (M3) are directly obtained for the first time from the same preparation. These measurements can be used to fully characterize the middle ear as a two-port system. Presently, the effect of the middle ear on otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) is quantified by calculating the roundtrip middle-ear pressure gain Gme(RT) as the product of M1 and M2. In the 2-6.8 kHz region, absolute value(Gme(RT)) decreases with a slope of -22 dB/oct, while OAEs (both click evoked and distortion products) tend to be independent of frequency; this suggests a steep slope in vestibule pressure from 2 kHz to at least 4 kHz for click evoked OAEs and to at least 6.8 kHz for distortion product OAEs. Contrary to common assumptions, measurements indicate that the emission generator mechanism is frequency dependent. Measurements are also used to estimate the reflectance of basally traveling waves at the stapes, and apically generated nonlinear reflections within the vestibule.

Acoustics↗