PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Susan A Lagerstedt

Publications and source records attributed to Susan A Lagerstedt.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Measurement of plasma free metanephrine and normetanephrine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.

BACKGROUND: Quantification of plasma free metanephrines is usually accomplished by HPLC with electrochemical detection, but sample preparation is labor-intensive and time-consuming, run times are long, and interfering substances sometimes obscure the relevant peaks. The aim of this study was to develop a sensitive and specific LC-MS/MS method for plasma free metanephrines. METHODS: After solid-phase extraction, chromatographic separation of normetanephrine (NMN) and metanephrine (MN) was accomplished by use of a cyano analytical column. NMN, MN, d(3)-NMN, and d(3)-MN positive ions were detected in the multiple-reaction monitoring mode using the specific transitions m/z 166-->134, 180-->148, 169-->137, and 183-->151, respectively, with an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization source. RESULTS: Multiple calibration curves exhibited consistent linearity and reproducibility. Interassay imprecision values (CV; n = 20) for NMN at 0.64, 1.9, and 2.7 nmol/L were 6.6%, 7.8%, and 13%, respectively. Interassay CV for MN at 0.60, 1.2, and 2.1 nmol/L (n = 20) were 9.2%, 6.8%, and 9.8%, respectively. The mean recoveries of NMN and MN relative to the internal standard were 100% and 96%, respectively. The assays were linear between 0.20 and 10.0 nmol/L. Deming regression of HPLC and LC-MS/MS results yielded slopes of 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.98) and 0.89 (0.85-0.93) and y-intercepts of -0.16 and 0.03 nmol/L for NMN (n = 132) and MN (n = 92), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This novel LC-MS/MS approach provides a precise, rapid, and specific alternative method to HPLC for the quantification of the low nanomolar concentrations of free metanephrines in plasma.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗

Gender differences in C-reactive protein concentrations-confirmation with two sensitive methods.

Two new automated, highly sensitive methods for the measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) were compared using blood samples from active and retired health care workers (116 males, 114 females). The regression equation was y=1.115x-0.0267 forthe Kamiya K assay immunoturbidimetric method (x) vs. the Behring BNII nephelometric method (y) with medians (IQR) of 0.156 (0.081 to 0.276) and 0.150 (0.060 to 0.240) mg/dl, respectively. Significant differences in hsCRP values between males and females were observed (p=0.013 and p=0.0018 for Behring and Kamiya methods, respectively). This gender difference in CRP levels was confirmed by analysis of serum samples from 1,114 individuals (639 males and 475 females) obtained through Mayo Medical Laboratories reference services, which represents participants from across the United States. The gender difference, which was confirmed (p<0.0001), was independent of age differences as assessed by multiple regression analysis. The observed gender differences have important implications for the establishment of cut-off points for cardiovascular risk stratification.

Adult↗