Biomedical subjects

Susan C Moore

Publications and source records attributed to Susan C Moore.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Structural characterization of macroH2A containing chromatin.

MacroH2A (mH2A) is one of the most recently identified members of the heteromorphous histone variant family. It is unique among the members of this group because it contains an unusually large non-histone C-terminal end, from where its name derives, and appears to be restricted to subphylum vertebrata. Although a concerted effort has been carried out in order to characterize the physiological relevance of mH2A, little is known in comparison about the structural importance of the molecule. Elucidating the biophysical and conformational proprieties of mH2A in chromatin may provide clues into the links between this histone variant and its unique function(s). In this paper, we look first at the heterogeneous tissue-specific distribution of this protein in different vertebrate classes. This is followed by a structural comparison between mH2A and H2A protein and by the characterization of the nucleosome core particles with which these histone subtypes are associated. We find that the highly alpha-helical C-terminus of mH2A confers an asymmetric conformation to nucleosomes and that this variant is tightly bound to chromatin fragments in a way that does not depend on the overall extent of acetylation of the other core histones.

Acetylation↗

PubMed2002

Histone ubiquitination: a tagging tail unfolds?

Despite the fact that histone H2A ubiquitination affects about 10-15% of this histone in most eukaryotic cells, histone ubiquitination is among one of the less-well-characterized post-translational histone modifications. Nevertheless, some important observations have been made in recent years. Whilst several enzymes had been known to ubiquitinate histones in vitro, recent studies in yeast have led to the unequivocal identification of the enzyme responsible for this post-translational modification in this organism. A strong functional co-relation to meiosis and spermiogenesis has also now been well documented, although its participation in other functional aspects of chromatin metabolism, such as transcription or DNA repair, still remains rather speculative and controversial. Because of its nature, histone ubiquitination represents the most bulky structural change to histones and as such it would be expected to exert an important effect on chromatin structure. Past and recent structural studies, however, indicate a surprising lack of effect of (H2A/H2B) ubiquitination on nucleosome architecture and of uH2A on chromatin folding. These results suggest that this modification may serve as a signal for recognition by functionally relevant trans-acting factors and/or operate synergistically in conjunction with other post-translational modifications such as for instance acetylation.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

The elusive structural role of ubiquitinated histones.

It is increasingly apparent that histone posttranslational modifications are important in chromatin structure and dynamics. However, histone ubiquitination has received little attention. Histones H1, H3, H2A, and H2B can be ubiquitinated in vivo, but the most prevalent are uH2A and uH2B. The size of this modification suggests some sort of structural impact. Physiological observations suggest that ubiquitinated histones may have multiple functions and structural effects. Ubiquitinated histones have been correlated with transcriptionally active DNA, implying that it may prevent chromatin folding or help maintain an open conformation. Also, in some organisms during spermiogenesis, a process involving extensive chromatin remodeling, uH2A levels increase just prior to histone replacement by protamines. Determination of chromatin's structural changes resulting from histone ubiquitination is therefore important. Recent work using reconstituted nucleosomes and chromatin fibers containing uH2A indicate that in the absence of linker histones, ubiquitination has little structural impact. DNase I digests and analytical ultracentrifugation of reconstituted ubiquitinated nucleosomes show no structural differences. Solubility assays using reconstituted chromatin fibers in the presence of divalent ions demonstrate that uH2A fibers are slightly more prone to aggregation than controls, and analytical ultracentrifugation results with different MgCl2 and NaCl concentrations determined that chromatin folding is not affected by this modification. Additional work to assess possible synergistic affects with histone acetylation also precludes any structural implications. Protamine displacement experiments concluded that the presence of uH2A does not significantly affect the ability of the protamines to displace histones. In addition, uH2A does not interfere with histone H1 binding to the nucleosome. While work with uH2B remains insufficient to come to any definitive conclusions about its structural impact, current work with uH-2A indicates that, contrary to predictions, this histone modification does not affect either nucleosome or chromatin structure. Consequently, the search for a structural role for ubiquitinated histones continues and their effect on and importance in chromatin dynamics remains elusive.

Animals↗