Biomedical subjects

Susan E Fisher

Publications and source records attributed to Susan E Fisher.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Obtaining self-report data from cognitively impaired elders: methodological issues and clinical implications for nursing home pain assessment.

PURPOSE: We developed and evaluated an explicit procedure for obtaining self-report pain data from nursing home residents across a broad range of cognitive status, and we evaluated the consistency, stability, and concurrent validity of resident responses. DESIGN AND METHODS: Using a modification of the Geriatric Pain Measure (GPM-M2), we interviewed 61 residents from two nursing homes (Mini-Mental State Examination score, M = 15 +/- 7) once a week for 4 consecutive weeks. We collected additional data by means of chart review, cognitive status assessments, and surveys of certified nursing assistants. We used descriptive and correlational analyses to address our primary aims. RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of residents completed all four scheduled interviews. Cognitive status was not significantly correlated with number of nonresponses and prompts for yes-no questions, but it was significantly correlated with nonresponses and prompts for Likert-scale questions (r = -.48, p <.001 and r = -.59, p <.001, respectively). Completion time for the 17-item pain measure (M = 13 min) was not predicted by cognitive status. Residents' scores on the GPM-M2 were significantly correlated with number of chronic pain-associated diagnoses, r =.37, p <.01, and internal consistency was excellent, alpha = 0.87 - 0.91. Residents' GPM-M2 scores were stable over time, r =.74-.80, p <.0001, for all comparisons. IMPLICATIONS: Using explicit protocols and reporting procedural data allows researchers and clinicians to better understand and apply results of self-report studies with cognitively impaired elders. Results suggest that many nursing home residents can provide consistent and reliable self-report pain data, given appropriate time and assistance.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Behavioral characteristics of agitated nursing home residents with dementia at the end of life.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine group differences in verbal agitation, verbal interaction, bed restraint, pain, analgesic and neuroleptic medication use, and medical comorbidity among agitated nursing home residents who died during a 6-month clinical trial compared with residents of the same gender and similar initial cognitive status who did not die during the trial. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a two-group secondary data analysis of prospective observational data from 10 nursing homes in Birmingham, Alabama. By means of chart review, resident assessments, surveys of certified nursing assistants, and direct observation of residents' daily behaviors and environment, 32 residents (87.34 +/- 7.29 years) with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score = 4.31 (+/-5.54) who died were compared with 32 residents (84 +/- 6.96 years) with a mean MMSE score = 4.28 (+/-5.49) who did not die during the clinical trial. RESULTS: Residents who died displayed more verbal agitation, less time in verbal interaction with staff, and almost twice as much time restrained in bed during observation time in comparison with residents who did not die during the clinical trial. However, groups did not differ significantly in severity of comorbid illness, functional status, number of painful diagnoses, certified nursing assistants' reports of residents' pain, or opioid or nonopioid analgesic prescription or dosage. Surviving residents were more likely to receive neuroleptic medication than residents who died. IMPLICATIONS: Results suggest that agitated nursing home residents may exhibit a heightened level of verbal agitation, decreased verbal interaction with staff, and increased bed restraint up to 3 months prior to death. Prospective observational studies are needed to identify markers for imminent mortality among nursing home residents.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2004

Quality of care in the nursing home: effects of staff assignment and work shift.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare a variety of resident and staff outcomes across two types of staffing patterns, permanent and rotating assignment, and work shift. Although studies have examined these staffing patterns as part of multicomponent intervention packages, few studies have examined the isolated effects of staffing pattern by using an experimental design. DESIGN AND METHODS: A between-groups comparison design was used to compare residents and certified nursing assistants (CNAs) from four nursing homes; two self-identified as using permanent assignment (PA) staffing and two as using rotating assignment (RA) staffing. Measures yielded data on verbal interaction among residents and staff, resident disruptive behavior, and specific aspects of resident-staff behavior during care routines. Other assessments included resident personal appearance and hygiene, expressed affect, and CNAs' job satisfaction, burnout, absenteeism, and turnover rates. A treatment fidelity check was conducted to confirm PA and RA staffing patterns. RESULTS: Staffing patterns were significantly different between self-identified PA and RA nursing homes. Residents in PA nursing homes and on morning shifts received significantly higher ratings of personal appearance and hygiene. Rates of expressed sadness and interest among residents differed by staffing patterns and shift. However, these differences do not appear to be clinically significant. Although absenteeism was higher in PA nursing homes, these CNAs reported greater job satisfaction than CNAs from RA nursing homes. As expected, evening shifts across nursing homes had significantly higher turnover rates and significantly more resident disruptive behavior. IMPLICATIONS: Quality-of-care outcomes were similar among the two types of nursing homes, despite significantly different staffing patterns. Though staff permanency rates in PA nursing homes (50%) were twice that of RA nursing homes (26%), more research is needed to determine feasibility of higher rates of staff permanency (i.e., > 50%) and effects on resident and CNA outcomes.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Prescription and dosage of analgesic medication in relation to resident behaviors in the nursing home.

OBJECTIVES: To examine correlates of analgesic medication prescription and administration in communicative, cognitively impaired nursing home residents. Residents' behaviors were assessed using computer-assisted real-time observations as potential adjunctive indicators of pain. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study over a 4-week period. SETTING: Five nursing homes in the greater Birmingham, Alabama, area. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-two residents (mean age +/- standard deviation = 83.86 +/- 8.55) with a mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 13.81 +/- 6.34. MEASUREMENTS: Data were obtained via chart review, resident assessments, questionnaire completion by certified nursing assistants familiar with residents' care, and direct observation of residents' daily behaviors. RESULTS: Receipt of analgesic medication was related to self-report of pain (F2,89 = 9.89, P =.0001), MMSE (F2,88 = 3.98, P =.022), and time spent inactive (F2,89 = 3.04, P =.053). Residents who received analgesic medication reported greater intensity of pain than other residents. Residents who received analgesics had higher MMSE scores than those who did not receive analgesics. Residents who received analgesics spent less time being inactive than those not prescribed analgesics. Receipt of higher dosage of opioid analgesic medication was associated with more time spent with others in verbal interaction (r =.22, P =.03). CONCLUSION: This study refines the methodology of measuring analgesic medication dosage and its effect on resident behavior. Analgesic prescription and administration patterns are related to time residents spend being inactive. Results suggest that opioid analgesics may hold particular promise in alleviating pain, as indicated by resident behaviors.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Pain assessment and management in cognitively impaired nursing home residents: association of certified nursing assistant pain report, Minimum Data Set pain report, and analgesic medication use.

OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of this preliminary study was to investigate the associations between certified nursing assistant (CNA) report of pain, Minimum Data Set (MDS) report of pain, and analgesic medication use in cognitively impaired nursing home residents. DESIGN: Correlational study. SETTING: Three nursing homes in the greater Birmingham, Alabama area. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-seven cognitively impaired nursing home residents with a mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 11.1. MEASUREMENTS: Pain was assessed using a three-item proxy pain questionnaire (PPQ), developed by the researchers and administered to the residents' primary CNA. MDS and analgesic medication data corresponding with the time of PPQ data collection were gathered from medical records. Cognitive status was measured with the MMSE. RESULTS: The PPQ elicited substantially higher estimates of pain prevalence than the MDS (48% versus 20%), and the PPQ and the MDS were not well correlated (pain frequency: r=.19, P=.18; pain intensity: r=.22, P=.11). The PPQ was also more strongly associated with analgesic medication use than the MDS. Cognitive status was significantly associated with pain report on the PPQ but not on the MDS. Test-retest reliability coefficients for the three items of the PPQ were excellent, ranging from.84 to.87 (P </=.01). CONCLUSIONS: The CNA-generated PPQ was a more sensitive measure of pain than the MDS for this sample. Although the MDS represents an important step toward systematic and standardized assessment of pain, more emphasis should be placed on multimodal assessment, including CNAs' perceptions and observations about pain experienced by cognitively impaired nursing home residents.

Aged↗