Biomedical subjects

Susan E Hall

Publications and source records attributed to Susan E Hall.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

The effects of lateralized adaptors on lateral position judgements of tones within and across frequency channels.

Two experiments examined the effect of highly lateralized adaptor tone pulses on the perceived intracranial location of subsequent test tones. In Experiment 1, adaptor tones of each of two frequencies, highly lateralized to opposite sides by a quarter-period interaural time difference (ITD), were found to shift the perceived intracranial location of test tones of each adaptor frequency away from the side of the adaptor. The shift in perceived location was seen for all test tone ITDs with the same sign as the adaptor tone, and sometimes extended to include test tones with small ITDs favoring the opposite ear. The generality of the effect across test tone ITDs of the same sign as the adaptor suggests that the human auditory lateralization system is built of two (left, right) hemifield-tuned azimuthal channels, and that perceived lateral location depends on the relative outputs of those two channels. In Experiment 2, the perceived location of test tones lateralized by ITD was studied in the same listeners at each of the same two frequencies, but after selective adaptation with tone pulses of only one frequency and laterality. The perceived lateral position of test tones with the same frequency as that of the adaptor underwent the same changes as seen in Experiment 1. The perceived lateral position of test tones of the nonadapted frequency usually shifted weakly in the opposite direction, i.e., in the direction expected if the second adaptor from Experiment 1 had actually been present. These data have implications both for the processes mediating selective adaptation using contingent stimuli, and for the azimuthal tuning of auditory spatial channels in man.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2006

Development of perceptual correlates of reading performance.

Performance on perceptual tasks requiring the discrimination of brief, temporally proximate or temporally varying sensory stimuli (temporal processing tasks) is impaired in some individuals with developmental language disorder and/or dyslexia. Little is known about how these temporal processes in perception develop and how they relate to language and reading performance in the normal population. The present study examined performance on 8 temporal processing tasks and 5 language/reading tasks in 120 unselected readers who varied in age over a range in which reading and phonological awareness were developing. Performance on all temporal processing tasks except coherent motion detection improved over ages 7 years to adulthood (p<0.01), especially between ages 7 and 13 years. Independent of these age effects, performance on all 8 temporal processing tasks predicted phonological awareness and reading performance (p<0.05), and three auditory temporal processing tasks predicted receptive language function (p<0.05). Furthermore, all temporal processing measures except within-channel gap detection and coherent motion detection predicted unique variance in phonological scores within subjects, whereas only within-channel gap detection performance explained unique variance in orthographic reading performance. These findings partially support the (Farmer, M.E., Klein, R.M., 1995. The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2, 460-493) notion of there being separable auditory and visual perceptual contributions to phonological and orthographic reading development. The data also are compatible with the view that the umbrella term "temporal processing" encompasses fundamentally different sensory or cognitive processes that may contribute differentially to language and reading performance, which may have different developmental trajectories and be differentially susceptible to pathology.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Interaction in the perceptual processing of interaural time and level differences.

Phillips and Hall [Psychophysical evidence for adaptation of central auditory processors for interaural differences in time and level, Hear. Res., 202 (2005) 188-199.] recently described the frequency-specific, selective adaptation of perceptual channels for interaural differences in level (ILD) and time (ITD). Psychometric functions for laterality based on ITD or ILD were obtained before and after exposure to adaptor tones of two frequencies presented alternately and highly lateralized to opposite sides. Following adaptation, points of perceived centrality (PPCs) were displaced towards the sides of the adaptor tones, and in opposite directions for the two frequencies. That is, laterality judgements showed a shift away from the adapted side, particularly for test cue values near the middle of the range. These data were congruent with a two-channel, opponent-process model of sound laterality coding. The present study used the same general paradigm to explore the independence of perceptual ITD and ILD processing. Psychometric functions for laterality based on ITD or ILD were obtained for each of two frequencies concurrently, before and after exposure to adaptor tones lateralized using the complementary cue. Once again, PPCs derived from the psychometric functions were displaced towards the sides of the adaptor tones, consistent with an opponent-process account of sound laterality coding. The size of the adaptation effect was at least as great as that described in the earlier study. Thus, a quarter cycle ITD adapting stimulus effected a 3 dB shift in the mean ILD-based PPC, and a 12 dB ILD adapting stimulus effected a 100 micros shift in the mean ITD-based PPC. These data offer new evidence concerning interaction in the processing of ITDs and ILDs.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2005

Psychophysical evidence for adaptation of central auditory processors for interaural differences in time and level.

Human listeners were studied for their ability to lateralize single target tones of each of two frequencies relative to midline clicks. They did so before and after exposure to adaptor tones of the same frequencies. The adaptor tones were strongly lateralized, and in opposite directions for each frequency, by either an interaural time difference (ITD, Experiment 1) or interaural level difference (ILD, Experiment 2). Following adaptation, psychometric functions for ITD (Exp. 1) and ILD (Exp. 2) were obtained for target tones for the two frequencies separately. These were found to be shifted in the direction of the fatigued side. In the case of ILD, this was in the absence of a shift in monaural sensitivity sufficient to account for the effect. For both ITD and ILD studies, shifts in perceived laterality were induced in opposite directions at two frequencies concurrently. This effect was induced with only seconds of intermittent exposure to the adaptor tones. The fact that it could be induced at two frequencies in opposite directions at the same time, suggests (a), that these data constitute new psychophysical evidence for the frequency specificity of ITD and ILD coding in the human brain, and (b), that the effect was not due to the introduction of some response bias at the decision level of perceptual judgement. The data are interpreted in terms of a two- or three-channel opponent process model.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Spatial stimulus cue information supplying auditory saltation.

Auditory saltation is a misperception of the spatial location of repetitive, transient stimuli. It arises when clicks at one location are followed in perfect temporal cadence by identical clicks at a second location. This report describes two psychophysical experiments designed to examine the sensitivity of auditory saltation to different stimulus cues for auditory spatial perception. Experiment 1 was a dichotic study in which six different six-click train stimuli were used to generate the saltation effect. Clicks lateralised by using interaural time differences and clicks lateralised by using interaural level differences produced equivalent saltation effects, confirming an earlier finding. Switching the stimulus cue from an interaural time difference to an interaural level difference (or the reverse) in mid train was inconsequential to the saltation illusion. Experiment 2 was a free-field study in which subjects rated the illusory motion generated by clicks emitted from two sound sources symmetrically disposed around the interaural axis, ie on the same cone of confusion in the auditory hemifield opposite one ear. Stimuli in such positions produce spatial location judgments that are based more heavily on monaural spectral information than on binaural computations. The free-field stimuli produced robust saltation. The data from both experiments are consistent with the view that auditory saltation can emerge from spatial processing, irrespective of the stimulus cue information used to determine click laterality or location.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Detection of static and dynamic changes in interaural correlation.

This study examines the relation between a static and a dynamic measure of interaural correlation discrimination: (1) the just noticeable difference (JND) in interaural correlation and (2) the minimum detectable duration of a fixed interaural correlation change embedded within a single noise-burst of a given reference correlation. For the first task, JNDs were obtained from reference interaural correlations of + 1, -1, and from 0 interaural correlation in either the positive or negative direction. For the dynamic task, duration thresholds were obtained for a brief target noise of +1, -1, and 0 interaural correlation embedded in reference marker noise of +1, -1, and 0 interaural correlation. Performance with a reference interaural correlation of +1 was significantly better than with a reference correlation of -1. Similarly, when the reference noise was interaurally uncorrelated, discrimination was significantly better for a target correlation change towards +1 than towards -1. Thus, for both static and dynamic tasks, interaural correlation discrimination in the positive range was significantly better than in the negative range. Using the two measures, the length of a binaural temporal window was estimated. Its equivalent rectangular duration (ERD) was approximately 86 ms and independent of the interaural correlation configuration.

Adult↗