Biomedical subjects

Susan Fairchild

Publications and source records attributed to Susan Fairchild.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Neglect assessment in urban emergency departments and confirmation by an expert clinical team.

BACKGROUND: Elder neglect accounts for over 70% of all adult protective services reports in the nation annually, and it has been estimated that there are over 70,000 new cases each year. The purpose of this study was to conduct elder neglect research in the emergency department (ED), using a dyadic vulnerability/risk-profiling framework for elder neglect. METHODS: Patients were recruited through four EDs in New York and Tampa from the beginning of February 2001 through the end of September 2003. Demographics, a Mini-Mental Status Examination score, and an initial elder assessment screen were collected. The diagnosis of neglect was then made by a Neglect Assessment Team (NAT) comprising a nurse, physician, and social worker, with extensive clinical experience in elder neglect. RESULTS: Of the 3664 ED screens of adults 70 years and older, 405 (11%) met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate. Neglect was diagnosed by the NAT in 86 of the 405 cases reviewed. Demographic differences between neglect versus no neglect cases were examined using Fisher's exact test, and differences emerged between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: This study documents the underreporting of cases of neglect as evidenced by differences in diagnoses by screeners versus experts. The research assistants screened positive for neglect in 5% (N=22) of the 405 cases. The NAT made the diagnosis of neglect in 22% (86/389) of the cases. This markedly different rate of neglect may mean that ED screens are important but may underestimate the true number of cases. Conversely, an NAT may make the diagnosis of neglect in an older adult more often given a higher sensitivity and a more robust knowledge base of the problem.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Dyadic vulnerability and risk profiling for elder neglect.

PURPOSE: Neglect of older adults accounts for 60% to 70% of all elder-mistreatment reports made to adult protective services. The purpose of this article is to report data from research, using a risk-and-vulnerability model, that captures the independent contributions of both the elder and the caregiver as they relate to the outcome of neglect. METHODS: Between February 2001 and September 2003, older adults were screened and recruited through four emergency departments in New York and Tampa. The diagnosis of neglect was made by an expert neglect-assessment team. Elders and their caregivers were then scheduled for separate face-to-face interviews after discharge. RESULTS: Constructs within the risk-and-vulnerability model were examined for scale-score significance based on the outcome diagnosis of neglect. In the risk domain, caregivers' functional status, childhood trauma, and personality were statistically significant. In the vulnerability domain, the elders' cognitive status, functional status, depression, social support, childhood trauma, and personality were significant. IMPLICATIONS: Findings from this study underscore the value of interdisciplinary assessment teams in emergency departments for screening elder neglect, with attention given to risk factors related to the caregiver and elder vulnerability factors, including reports of childhood trauma. The risk-and-vulnerability model may provide a link between the caregiving and neglect research. Data should be collected independently from both members of the elder-caregiver dyad in order for clinicians to understand factors related to elders who receive the diagnosis of neglect from interdisciplinary teams.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Attitudes toward working on interdisciplinary healthcare teams: a comparison by discipline.

Interdisciplinary teams are important in providing care for older patients, but interdisciplinary teamwork is rarely a teaching focus, and little is known about trainees' attitudes towards it. To determine the attitudes of second-year post-graduate (PGY-2) internal medicine or family practice residents, advanced practice nursing (NP), and masters-level social work (MSW) students toward the value and efficiency of interdisciplinary teamwork and the physician's role on the team, a baseline survey was administered to 591 Geriatrics Interdisciplinary Team Training participants at eight U.S. academic medical centers from January 1997 to July 1999. Most students in each profession agreed that the interdisciplinary team approach benefits patients and is a productive use of time, but PGY-2s consistently rated their agreement lower than NP or MSW students. Interprofessional differences were greatest for beliefs about the physician's role; 73% of PGY-2s but only 44% to 47% of MSW and NP trainees agreed that a team's primary purpose was to assist physicians in achieving treatment goals for patients. Approximately 80% of PGY-2s but only 35% to 40% of MSW or NP trainees agreed that physicians have the right to alter patient care plans developed by the team. Although students from all three disciplines were positively inclined toward medical interdisciplinary teamwork, medical residents were the least so. Exposure to interdisciplinary teamwork may need to occur at an earlier point in medical training than residency. The question of who is ultimately responsible for the decisions of the team may be an "Achilles heel," interfering with shared decision-making.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Geriatric competencies for RNs in hospitals.

Nurses in staff development are responsible for assuring nurses' competence in the delivery of care. Older patients are the predominant population in hospitals, yet there are no instruments that specifically assess the competency of nurses to deliver care to older patients. This article reports on the development and testing of an instrument, Geriatric Competencies for RNs in Hospitals, and makes recommendations as to how staff development educators can use the geriatric competency instrument with staff nurses.

Adult↗