PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Susan H Babey

Publications and source records attributed to Susan H Babey.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A population-based survey of prostate-specific antigen testing among California men at higher risk for prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Despite the lack of evidence demonstrating a survival benefit from prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, its use has become widespread, organizations have encouraged physicians to discuss early detection of prostate carcinoma, and two higher risk groups have been recognized. In the current study, the authors examined whether African-American men and men who had a family history of prostate carcinoma underwent PSA testing preferentially, and patterns of test use were examined according to age, race, and other factors. METHODS: Data regarding self-reported PSA test use in the past year among men age 50 years and older without a history of prostate carcinoma (n = 8713 men) were analyzed from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. RESULTS: The overall rate of PSA use was 43.0%. Older age, higher socioeconomic status, having a usual source of healthcare, and a family history of prostate carcinoma were the strongest predictors of testing. Higher risk African-American men age 50 years and older were no more likely to be tested than white men. Men at higher risk who had a family history of prostate carcinoma were more likely to have been tested than men who had no such family history. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of PSA use among higher risk men who had a family history of prostate carcinoma were higher compared with the rates among men without such a family history. However, PSA testing rates among higher risk African-American men were no different than the rates among lower risk white men, suggesting that some risk factors for prostate carcinoma (but not others) are associated with preferential testing. Testing in all groups was associated with access to care variables, highlighting the importance of removing barriers to preventive healthcare services.

Black or African American↗
PubMed2006

Emergency department visits for asthma: the role of frequent symptoms and delay in care.

BACKGROUND: Use of the emergency department (ED) for asthma care is a costly form of health care that is largely preventable. However, little is known about how to reduce the number of people using the ED for asthma care. OBJECTIVE: To identify modifiable factors related to ED visits for asthma among a diverse nonelderly adult population. METHODS: This study used cross-sectional data from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. A total of 4,359 adult respondents ages 18 to 64 years who reported being diagnosed as having asthma and experiencing symptoms in the past year were included. Any ED visits due to asthma in the previous 12 months among all nonelderly respondents with asthma, with stratification by those with daily or weekly symptoms and with less frequent symptoms, were examined. RESULTS: Adults with daily or weekly asthma symptoms, with fair or poor health status, and who delayed care for asthma because of cost or insurance issues were more likely to visit the ED for asthma. Stratification of the study population into those with daily or weekly symptoms and those with less frequent symptoms revealed that delay in care due to cost or insurance issues and fair or poor health status remained significant for both groups. Latinos and women were more likely to visit the ED in the severe asthma group, whereas Asian, African American, and uninsured adults were more likely to visit the ED in the group with less severe asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that to prevent ED visits for asthma, it is important to control asthma symptoms. However, it is equally if not more important to reduce delays in receiving asthma care.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Is there a language divide in pap test use?

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether primary language use, measured by language of interview, is associated with disparities in cervical cancer screening. DATA SOURCES: We undertook a secondary data analysis of a pooled sample of the 2001 and 2003 California Health Interview Surveys. The surveys were conducted in English, Spanish, Cantonese, Mandarin, Korean, and Vietnamese. STUDY DESIGN: The study was a cross-sectional analysis of 3-year Pap test use among women ages 18 to 64, with no reported cervical cancer diagnosis or hysterectomy (n = 38,931). In addition to language of interview, other factors studied included race/ethnicity, marital status, income, educational attainment, years lived in the United States, insurance status, usual source of care, smoking status, area of residence, and self-rated health status. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We fit weighted multivariate logit models predicting 3-year Pap test use as a function of language of interview, adjusting for the effects of specified covariates. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Compared with the referent English interview group, women who interviewed in Spanish were 1.65 times more likely to receive a Pap test in the past 3 years. In contrast, we observed a significantly reduced risk of screening among women who interviewed in Vietnamese (odds ratio [OR] 0.67; confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.93), Cantonese (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.30-0.66), Mandarin (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.33-0.72), and Korean (OR 0.62; 0.40-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Improved language access could reduce cancer screening disparities, especially in the Asian immigrant community.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Less than one-quarter of California adults walk regularly.

This policy brief presents information about the walking habits of California adults based on data from the 2003 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS 2003). We examine the prevalence of regular walking and no walking by socio-demographic and neighborhood characteristics. Regular walking is defined as walking on at least five separate occasions for a combined total of at least 150 minutes in the previous seven days. This definition is based on the recommendation that adults engage in moderate physical activity for at least 30 minutes on five or more days of the week. Occasional walking is defined as walking at least once for 10 or more minutes in the previous seven days. No walking is defined as not walking at least once for 10 or more minutes in the previous seven days.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Nearly six million Californians suffer from asthma symptoms or asthma-like breathing problems.

In California, 4.5 million adults, adolescents and children had been diagnosed with asthma (13% of all Californians) in 2003, up from four million (12%) in 2001. This increase is consistent in younger children, adolescents and adults (Exhibit 1). Nationally, 10% of the population has been diagnosed with asthma. Among the 4.5 million Californians diagnosed with asthma, more than 2.5 million suffered from an asthma attack or other asthma symptoms in 2003 (56% of those diagnosed). An additional 3.4 million Californians who have not been diagnosed with asthma-10% of all Californians-suffer from asthma-like breathing problems. Some of these respondents might have other respiratory conditions, while others are likely to have asthma that has not been diagnosed. Based on data from the 2003 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS 2003), this policy brief examines the prevalence of lifetime asthma diagnoses and asthma symptoms, as well as the prevalence of asthma-like breathing problems in the absence of an asthma diagnosis. Where possible, it also describes how prevalence has changed since 2001, based on data from CHIS 2001. Lifetime prevalence refers to people who have ever been diagnosed with asthma by a doctor. The prevalence of asthma symptoms refers to people who report having been diagnosed with asthma and who also reported experiencing an asthma attack or other asthma symptoms in the past year. The prevalence of asthma-like symptoms refers to people who have not been diagnosed with asthma but who experienced breathing problems, such as wheezing or whistling in the chest in the past year.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

A population-based study of colorectal cancer test use: results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey.

BACKGROUND: Recent research has supported the use of colorectal cancer (CRC) tests to reduce disease incidence, morbidity, and mortality. A new health survey has provided an opportunity to examine the use of these tests in California's ethnically diverse population. The authors used the 2001 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS 2001) to evaluate 1) rates of CRC test use, 2) predictors of the receipt of tests, and 3) reasons for nonuse of CRC tests. METHODS: The CHIS 2001 is a random-digit dial telephone survey that was conducted in California. Responses were analyzed from 22,343 adults age >/= 50 years. CRC test use was defined as receipt of a fecal occult blood test in the past year and/or receipt of an endoscopic examination in the past 5 years. RESULTS: Nearly 54% of California adults reported receipt of a recent CRC test. Insurance coverage and having a usual source of care were the most important predictors of CRC testing. Latinos age < 65 years were less likely to be tested than whites (relative risk [RR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.77-0.92). Men were more likely to be tested than women, an effect that was greater among individuals age 50-64 years (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.23-1.32) than among individuals age >/= 65 years (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.15-1.23). Women were more likely than men to say that their physician did not inform them the test was needed and that CRC tests were painful or embarrassing. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current study indicate a need for physicians to recommend CRC testing to their patients. Assuring that all individuals have both health insurance and a usual source of care would help address gaps in the receipt of CRC tests.

Aged↗