Biomedical subjects

Susan J Cunningham

Publications and source records attributed to Susan J Cunningham.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Reproducibility of soft tissue landmarks on three-dimensional facial scans.

This study evaluated the reproducibility of 24 soft tissue landmarks on six three-dimensional (3D) facial scans. The scans were taken on a DSP400 facial scanner and were viewed using a customized software program. Intraoperator data were obtained by one researcher placing the 24 landmarks on all six scans a total of 30 times. Thirty different orthodontists of varying experience were then asked to place all 24 landmarks on each of the six facial scans in order to establish interoperator reproducibility. The standard deviations (SDs) from the mean were calculated from the data for each individual landmark in the x-, y-, and z-axes. For the intraoperator data, 12 of the 24 landmarks were found to be reproducible to within a 1 mm SD for each plane of space. The interoperator data showed lower reproducibility with just two landmarks showing less than a 1 mm SD in all three planes of space. Familiarity with 3D facial scans and associated software programs is important in improving reproducibility. In addition, the landmarks investigated in this study included those not often used. It is suggested that landmarks showing poor reproducibility for both inter- and intraoperator data should be avoided, if at all possible, or at least used with caution.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Patient- and clinician-perceived need for orthognathic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: To better understand why patients believe they need orthognathic treatment, a study was undertaken to examine perceived need for treatment by patients and clinicians. This questionnaire-based study was undertaken at The John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty patients were recruited from combined orthodontic-surgical clinics. They were asked to rate their perceived need for treatment based on facial appearance, dental appearance, function, and overall need. Twenty orthodontists and 20 maxillofacial surgeons were asked to rate perceived need for treatment based on the same parameters, using study models and clinical photographs. Ratings were marked on visual analog scales. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between patients and clinicians in perceived need for treatment based on facial appearance (orthodontists compared with patients, P = .023; surgeons compared with patients, P = .001). In addition, maxillofacial surgeons rated a significantly greater overall need for treatment than patients (P = .027), and they rated treatment need based on facial appearance (P = .005) and function (P < .001) significantly higher than orthodontists. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians rated greater need for orthognathic treatment based on facial appearance than did patients. Surgeons also rated greater overall need for treatment than patients. In addition, surgeons rated treatment need based on facial appearance and function significantly higher than orthodontists, but large variations existed in both clinician groups.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

How predictable is orthognathic surgery?

There are a number of increasingly sophisticated techniques available for orthognathic treatment planning. All are based on the determination of the skeletal pattern and the position of the dentition. However, they all suffer from difficulties associated with predicting the soft tissue profile. The aim of this retrospective cephalometric investigation was, therefore, to compare the ability to predict accurately the outcome of orthognathic treatment using the 'hand planning' technique and the orthognathic planning and analysis (OPAL) computer program, with an emphasis on the soft tissue profile. Seventy adult subjects were divided into two groups not specific for gender or age: the Class III patients had undergone bimaxillary surgery and the Class II patients sagittal split mandibular advancement. In each group, the pre-treatment and post-debond lateral cephalograms were utilized to calculate the actual orthodontic and surgical movements. These values were then used to produce a prediction using both the hand planning technique and the OPAL program. The resultant predictions were digitized using a customized computer program and compared with the actual outcome. The results show that there was marked individual variation when planning by hand and using the OPAL program. In the mandibular surgery group, hand planning and OPAL were of similar accuracy and few points differed significantly between prediction and outcome. However, for the bimaxillary group, a number of points showed bias and the hand planning technique appeared to be more accurate than the OPAL program, particularly in the region of the lips. Although the usefulness of predictions is acknowledged, these results suggest that they should be used with a certain amount of caution.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Development of a condition-specific quality of life measure for patients with dentofacial deformity: II. Validity and responsiveness testing.

UNLABELLED: The assessment of quality of life is becoming increasingly important in dentistry. This may be measured using two groups of instruments: generic and condition-specific. OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the processes of validity and responsiveness testing of a condition-specific quality of life measure for patients who present with severe dentofacial deformity requesting orthognathic treatment (the so-called Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire). The development of the instrument is described in a previous paper. METHOD: The OQLQ was tested for validity using a visual analogue scale and also the Short-Form 36 health survey questionnaire. Responsiveness was tested using longitudinal data obtained before, during and after orthognathic treatment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The OQLQ shows good evidence of validity and responsiveness. This, together with previous evidence of good reliability, suggests that the instrument may prove useful in both clinical trials and in quality assurance.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Advances in orthodontics.

There has been tremendous progress in orthodontics since Edward Angle first popularised the fixed orthodontic appliance at the turn of the century. Recent years have seen an increased demand for orthodontic treatment from both adolescents and adults and, in addition, patient and clinician expectations of treatment outcomes continue to rise. A desire for more aesthetic materials has resulted in both smaller and 'tooth-coloured' appliances. Improvements in technology, often outside orthodontics, have also led to the development of new materials. The best example of this was the development of nickel titanium alloy by the NASA space programme, which was subsequently adapted for use in nickel titanium archwires. Other technological advances adopted for use in orthodontics include magnets, computerised imaging systems and distraction osteogenesis. This review paper looks at some of the innovations in the fields of materials as well as in techniques and appliance systems.

Adolescent↗