PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Susan J Skledar

Publications and source records attributed to Susan J Skledar.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Evaluation of conflicting literature and application to formulary decisions.

PURPOSE: Guidelines were developed for grading the quality, quantity, and consistency of drug literature in support of formulary recommendations. METHODS: Four developmental steps were taken to create a comprehensive literature evaluation system. The first step identified the attributes of a body of literature that were most reflective of its applicability to patient care. The next step defined each domain (quality, quantity, consistency), as determined by the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), in terms of the specific qualities to be assessed; a value was assigned to those qualities. Also, a literature search was conducted to identify strategies for evaluating bodies of literature employed in published assessment tools. Following the analysis of previously published systems, which were evaluated with respect to their inclusion of the AHRQ-identified domains, the next step was the development of specific domains and definitions to get a composite grade (with "better" evidence earning more points) for formulary recommendations. The final step was the creation of a system that aggregated the final score for the recommendation. The recommendation was categorized according to quality, quantity, and consistency of supporting evidence, and the total number of points was calculated and the recommendation given letter and numerical grades. RESULTS: The guidelines that were developed allow the user to accurately, consistently, and easily determine the strength of recommendations for a body of literature that may be conflicting. The addition of criteria for quantity and consistency to previously-published grading systems has made the guidelines more objective. CONCLUSION: A system that accounts for the quality, quantity, and consistency of drug literature was developed to assist in making formulary decisions.

Contrast Media↗
PubMed2006

Advanced practice internship: experiential learning in a drug use and disease state management program.

OBJECTIVE: Establish a 3-year hospital internship within a drug use and disease state management program that would provide doctor of pharmacy students with experiential learning while still completing their classroom studies. DESIGN: As paid interns, students engaged in group and individual activities that assessed clinical practice guidelines. Patient monitoring and clinical intervention techniques were learned through prospective evaluation of drug therapy. Students designed evidence-based treatment guidelines and participated in all phases of development, including multidisciplinary approval, implementation, and evaluation stages. ASSESSMENT: Student competency was continually monitored through direct observation by a preceptor and written examinations. Patient case studies, group discussions, and poster presentations allowed assessment of student growth in knowledge and communication skills. CONCLUSION: The comprehensive structure of this internship provides a broad perspective for understanding the role of the hospital pharmacist in providing pharmaceutical care. Close supervision maximizes student learning potential and fosters a mentoring relationship for both personal and professional growth.

Accreditation↗
PubMed2006

Assessing and monitoring override medications in automated dispensing devices.

BACKGROUND: Medication override is not without risk because the absence of pharmacist review may increase the potential for a medication error. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics assessed the safety of the automated dispensing device (ADD) override process to reduce the number of override medications stored in the ADD. METHODS: A representative expert panel developed criteria for override access and revised the override medication list; an override monitoring tool was used to perform random audits and determine nursing compliance; and changes in override practices for use of opioids, a high-alert medication class, were measured. RESULTS: The expert panel reduced the number of medications and dosage forms on the override list by 42%, from 119 different medications (in 244 different dosage forms) in 2001 to 92 different medications (in 163 different dosage forms) by December 2003. By May 2004 the opioid override rates were significantly decreased; although slight increases in rates occurred by December 2004, possibly reflecting the lack of formal override monitoring by nursing and pharmacy, the rates were still significantly lower than the baseline in October 2003. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists, in collaboration with the medical and nursing staffs, developed a sustainable process for preventing unauthorized and inappropriate override medication dispensing from ADDs.

Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over↗
PubMed2005

Promethazine adverse events after implementation of a medication shortage interchange.

BACKGROUND: Prochlorperazine and droperidol were commonly used antiemetics at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian Hospital until a shortage of prochlorperazine occurred and a black box warning was added to droperidol prescribing information. Subsequently, promethazine was selected as the approved intravenous antiemetic for therapeutic interchange in December 2001. Promethazine use and adverse drug events (ADEs) were investigated following review of a serious ADE that identified promethazine use as a probable contributing factor. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate ADEs associated with promethazine and characterize high-risk patients. METHODS: An ADE database analysis identified promethazine ADEs reported from 2000 to 2003. Promethazine utilization and ADEs were compared with those of other antiemetics during the pre- and post-interchange periods. RESULTS: Promethazine utilization increased significantly during the post-interchange period compared with all other antiemetics (p < 0.001). Promethazine ADEs increased from one event during the pre-interchange period to 13 events during the post-interchange period. Causality assessment using the Naranjo algorithm ranged from possible to probable. The promethazine ADE rate per 10 000 doses was significantly higher than the combined ADE rate for all other antiemetics (p < 0.001; incident rate ratio [IRR] 4.32). Elderly patients (aged > or =65 y) experienced more promethazine ADEs than younger patients (p = 0.005; IRR 4.68). Concurrent use of opioids and/or sedating drugs contributed to promethazine ADEs in 11 of 14 (78.6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric status is a significant risk factor for promethazine ADEs. Concomitant use of sedating drugs may further increase the risk for ADEs. Therapeutic interchange programs should be monitored for both ADEs and utilization.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Overcoming barriers to establishing an inpatient vaccination program for pneumococcus using standing orders.

OBJECTIVES: To identify and classify barriers to establishing a standing orders program (SOP) for adult pneumococcal vaccination in acute care inpatient facilities and to provide recommendations for overcoming these roadblocks. Vaccination rates in hospitals with SOPs are generally higher than those in hospitals that require individual physician orders. The array of solutions drawn from our experience in different hospital settings should permit many types of facilities to anticipate and overcome barriers, allowing a smoother transition from initiation to successful implementation of an inpatient pneumococcal vaccination SOP. DESIGN: Descriptive study of barriers and solutions encountered during implementation of a pneumococcal vaccination SOP in three hospitals of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System (UPMC) and in the scientific literature. SETTING: As of 2004, two UPMC tertiary-care hospitals and one UPMC community hospital had incorporated SOPs into existing physician order-driven programs for inpatient vaccination with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. RESULTS: Barriers were identified at each step of implementation and categorized as patient related, provider related, or institutional. Based on a process of continual review and revision of our programs in response to encountered barriers, steps were taken to overcome these impediments. CONCLUSIONS: A strong commitment by key individuals in the facility's administration including a physician champion; ongoing, persistent efforts to educate and train staff; and close monitoring of the vaccination rate were essential for successful implementation of a SOP for pneumococcal vaccination of eligible inpatients. Legal statutes and evaluations of external hospital-rating associations regarding the effectiveness of the vaccination program were major motivating factors in its success.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Low-dose granisetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of low-dose granisetron in postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. DATA SOURCES: Clinical trials available through PubMed and OVID (1966-July 2003), as well as information supplied by the drug manufacturer, were accessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Safety concerns associated with droperidol and limited availability of other agents have created a need to restructure prophylaxis guidelines for postoperative nausea and vomiting. It has recently been proposed that granisetron may be effective at a dose that is one-tenth of the Food and Drug Administration-approved dose. Conflicting evidence for this regimen is evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the scarcity of supporting data, this regimen is not recommended for prophylaxis in patients at risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed2003

Increasing pneumococcal vaccination rates among hospitalized patients.

OBJECTIVE: To increase the proportion of inpatients vaccinated against pneumococcal infection. DESIGN: Pre- and post-intervention study. SETTING: University medical center-affiliated, suburban community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Unvaccinated inpatients 65 years and older and those 2 to 64 years old who had chronic medical conditions predisposing them to invasive pneumococcal infection. INTERVENTION: The nursing staff screened newly admitted patients for eligibility based on age, diagnosis, or medications from a computer-generated admissions list and placed a pre-printed order form for the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) on the charts of eligible patients. Following the physician's order, the nursing staff administered the PPV and recorded it Ongoing quality improvements including admission vaccination screening and computer-based record keeping were initiated to identify unvaccinated eligible patients and track vaccination status. RESULTS: Efforts resulted in rates of in-hospital vaccination ranging from 3.1% to 7.9% (mean, 5.2% +/- 1.7% [standard deviation]) and significant improvements in the assessment of previous vaccination status, reaching 54% of eligible patients after 1 year. Ascertainment of a previous vaccination increased significantly following the initiation of the use of admission forms that specifically assessed vaccination status and a system to permanently record vaccination status in an electronic medical record (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Concerted efforts using electronic medical records significantly improved the assessment and documentation of inpatient vaccination status. Greater improvement of the rates of in-hospital vaccination will require healthcare system-wide efforts such as a standing order policy for vaccinating all eligible patients. Standing orders for inpatient immunization supported by effective assessment and tracking systems have the potential to raise vaccination rates to the goals of Healthy People 2010.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Impact of intensive care unit (ICU) drug use on hospital costs: a descriptive analysis, with recommendations for optimizing ICU pharmacotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost impact of intensive care unit (ICU) drug use on a hospital's total drug expense and to compare ICU pharmacy resource utilization with resource utilization of other hospital departments that provided services to the ICU. Additionally, to suggest strategies, based on these methods and results, to optimize ICU drug use. METHODS: Financial transactions for all ICU patients (n = 23,107) treated during fiscal years 1999-2002 were retrieved from the hospital's data repository. ICU drug costs were calculated both as the percentage of total drug costs for each fiscal year and adjusted for hospital volume (ICU patient days). ICU department charges were calculated as a percentage of total ICU charges and analyzed by simple descriptive statistics (mean +/- sd). Drug utilization was retrieved for those patients accounting for the highest percentage of ICU pharmacy charges. MAIN RESULTS: ICU drug costs accounted for 38.4% (+/-4.1% sd) of the total drug costs and have increased at a rate greater than non-ICU drug costs (12% vs. 6%). ICU pharmacy charges accounted for an average of 11.1% (+/-9.2% sd) of the total ICU charges, ranking as the fourth most costly of ICU charges. Both costly and highly used ICU therapies were identified for focus on cost-effectiveness analyses or application of an evidence-based drug use and disease state management program model to ICU pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: ICU drug therapies have a significant impact on hospital costs, and effective clinical informatics services and multidisciplinary collaboration programs are necessary to optimize ICU pharmacotherapy.

Academic Medical Centers↗