Biomedical subjects

Susan L Greenspan

Publications and source records attributed to Susan L Greenspan.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover are associated with long-term changes in bone mineral density in elderly women on alendronate, hormone replacement therapy, or combination therapy: a three-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.

Elderly women on combination therapy with alendronate and hormone replacement for osteoporosis have greater gains in bone mass than those on monotherapy. It is not known whether early changes in markers can predict the long-term changes in bone density with therapy. We assessed bone density and biochemical markers of bone turnover [urine N-telopeptide cross-linked collagen type 1 (NTx), serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin] every 6 months for 3 yr in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. After a 3-month run-in phase, 373 community-dwelling, elderly women were randomized to 1) alendronate, 2) hormone replacement therapy, 3) combination therapy with alendronate and hormone replacement therapy, or 4) placebo. Women on active treatment with the greatest decrease in markers of bone turnover at 6 months had the greatest increases in spine and hip bone density at 3 yr. The response to alendronate was generally associated with greater reductions in markers than the response to hormone replacement and was associated with greater increases in bone density at the spine and hip. Those in the tertile with the greatest decrease in urinary NTx had a 10.1% increase in spine bone density and a 6.1% increase in hip bone density compared with those in the lowest tertile, who had a 5.9% increase in spine bone density and a 2.1% increase in hip bone density. In women on active treatment, the area under the receiver operator curve for a 6-month change in markers to predict a response in bone mineral density at 3 yr was highest for urine NTx (range, 75-78%) and lowest for osteocalcin (range, 60-66%). We conclude that short-term changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover at 6 months predict bone density changes at the spine and hip at 3 yr in elderly women on alendronate, hormone replacement therapy, or combination therapy.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Altered bone mass in children at diagnosis of Crohn disease: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have indicated that bone mineral density is reduced in children with inflammatory bowel disease. The exact cause of this reduction is unclear, but it is often attributed to corticosteroid use. This study examined the prevalence of reduced bone mass in otherwise healthy children newly diagnosed with Crohn disease without previous corticosteroid exposure. METHODS: Eighteen steroid-naive children newly diagnosed with Crohn disease underwent dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Disease activity, growth and pubertal development, nutritional assessment and bone mass measurements were recorded. z scores were adjusted for bone age. RESULTS: Five of the 18 patients (28%) had a total bone mineral density z score less than -1 (one had a z score less than -2). Ten (56%) subjects had lumbar spine bone mineral density z scores less than -1 (two had z score less than -2). The subjects had significantly reduced mean lumbar spine bone mineral density z scores (P = 0.002). Delayed pubertal development correlated with whole body bone mineral density z scores (r = 0.64; P = 0.004). Most subjects were not meeting United States recommended dietary allowances for daily intake of calcium, vitamin D and total calories. The majority of subjects were not participating in weight-bearing physical activity. CONCLUSION: Decreased bone mass is common in steroid naive children newly diagnosed with Crohn disease. Crohn disease appears to contribute to impaired bone mass independent of corticosteroid therapy.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2004

Skeletal integrity in patients with nail patella syndrome.

Nail patella syndrome (NPS) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder resulting from a heterogeneous loss of function in the LMX1B gene. It is associated with multiple skeletal deformities, yet it is unknown whether this is associated with osteoporosis. To examine bone mass and the prevalence of fragility fractures, we assessed bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip in 31 adults and 12 children with mutation-confirmed NPS and 60 healthy age- and gender-matched adult controls. For the adults with NPS, BMD was 11-20% lower at the hip sites (P < or = 0.001) and 8% lower at the spine (P < 0.05) than that of controls. Even when adjusted for body mass index, the BMD remained significantly lower in patients with NPS in all hip regions but not in the spine. Adults with NPS also had a significantly lower Z-score (sd values from normal) at all hip sites (all P < 0.05), compared with age- and gender-matched controls in the manufacturer's database. However, children had significantly lower Z-scores only at the femoral neck and trochanter. Participants with NPS also had a higher prevalence of fractures (odds ratio 30.9, 95% confidence interval 6.4-149.6, P < 0.001) and scoliosis (odds ratio 16.0, 95% confidence interval 3.3-78.2, P < 0.001). The majority of these fractures occurred in women before puberty and in long bones, especially the clavicle. We conclude that adults with NPS have a BMD that is 8-20% lower than controls, which is associated with an increase in the prevalence of fractures and scoliosis. Future studies are needed to determine whether bone quality, geometry, or turnover could account for these findings.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity leads to an increase in bone turnover and a decrease in bone mass.

Little is known about the effects on the skeleton of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRGB) surgery for morbid obesity and subsequent weight loss. We compared 25 patients who had undergone LRGB 11 +/- 3 months previously with 30 obese controls matched for age, gender, and menopausal status. Compared with obese controls, patients post LRGB had significantly lower weight (92 +/- 16 vs. 133 +/- 20 kg; P < 0.001) and body mass index (31 +/- 5 vs. 48 +/- 7 kg/m(2); P < 0.001). Markers of bone turnover were significantly elevated in patients post LRGB compared with controls (urinary N-telopeptide cross-linked collagen type 1, 93 +/- 38 vs. 24 +/- 11 nmol bone collagen equivalents per mmol creatinine; and osteocalcin, 11.6 +/- 3.4 vs. 7.6 +/- 3.6 ng/ml; both P < 0.001). Fifteen patients were studied prospectively for an average of 9 months after LRGB. They lost 37 +/- 9 kg and had a 29 +/- 8% fall in body mass index (both P < 0.001). Urinary N-telopeptide cross-linked collagen type 1 increased by 174 +/- 168% at 3 months (P < 0.01) and 319 +/- 187% at 9 months (P < 0.01). Bone mineral density decreased significantly at the total hip (7.8 +/- 4.8%; P < 0.001), trochanter (9.3 +/- 5.7%; P < 0.001), and total body (1.6 +/- 2.0%; P < 0.05), with significant decreases in bone mineral content at these sites. In summary, within 3 to 9 months after LRGB, morbidly obese patients have an increase in bone resorption associated with a decrease in bone mass. Additional studies are needed to examine these findings over the longer term.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Vignettes in osteoporosis: a road map to successful therapeutics.

UNLABELLED: The diagnosis and management of osteoporosis have become increasingly more complex as new drugs enter the marketplace and meta-analyses of randomized trials with "other" agents become more prolific. We describe five common clinical scenarios encountered in the practice of osteoporosis medicine and various road maps that could lead to successful therapy. INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis have changed dramatically in the last decade. Advances in diagnostic technologies and a range of newer treatment options have provided the clinician with a wide array of choices for treating this chronic disease. Despite the issuance of several "guidelines" and practice recommendations, there still remains confusion among clinicians about basic approaches to the management of osteoporosis. This paper should be used as a case-based approach to define optimal therapeutic choices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five representative cases were selected from two very large clinical practices (Bangor, ME; Pittsburgh, PA). Diagnostic modalities and treatment options used in these cases were selected on an evidence-based analysis of respective clinical trials. Subsequent to narrative choices by two metabolic bone disease specialists (SG and CR), calculation of future fracture risk and selection of potential alternative therapeutic regimens were reviewed and critiqued by an epidemiologist (DB). RESULTS: A narrative about each case and possible management choices for each of the five cases are presented with references to justify selection of the various therapeutic options. Alternatives are considered and discussed based on literature and references through July 2003. The disposition of the individual patient is noted at the end of each case. CONCLUSIONS: A case-based approach to the management of osteoporosis provides a useful interface between guidelines, evidence-based meta-analyses, and clinical practice dilemmas.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

The management of osteoporosis following hip fracture: have we improved our care?

To determine if physicians have improved the recognition and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with an acute hip fracture, we performed a retrospective analysis of discharge data from 1995 and 2000 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, a large tertiary care, academic institution. We examined patients admitted with an acute hip fracture in 1995 and 2000 and age- and sex-matched patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia in 2000. Outcomes included age, gender, race, discharge diagnoses (from ICD-9 codes) and discharge medications (from discharge summaries) in all patients. There were 136 acute hip fracture patients (mean age 73+/-18 years) in 1995, 117 acute hip fracture patients (mean age 76+/-16 years) in 2000 and 116 patients with community-acquired pneumonia (mean age 78+/-7 years). Patients admitted in 2000 with an acute hip fracture were more likely to be diagnosed with osteoporosis (18% vs. 4%, P<0.02), more likely to be discharged on calcium (17% vs. 7%, P<0.02) and more likely to be discharged on antiresorptive therapy (15% vs. 2%, P<0.001) than those admitted in 1995. Moreover, patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia were just as likely to receive calcium, vitamin D or antiresorptive agents at the time of discharge as those with an acute hip fracture in 2000. Patients with a diagnosis of osteoporosis in 2000 were older and more likely to receive antiresorptive agents than those without a diagnosis (29% vs. 11%, P<0.05). None of the patients received a bone mineral density examination while in the hospital. Although there was an improvement in the management of osteoporosis after an acute hip fracture from 1995 to 2000, there was no difference in management of patients with hip fracture versus pneumonia in the year 2000. However, patients with a "diagnosis" of osteoporosis in 2000 were more likely to be discharged on appropriate therapeutic options. We conclude that although we have improved our care of osteoporosis for elderly in general from 1995 to 2000, patients with an acute hip fracture are not receiving any additional treatment unless they have a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Further studies are needed to determine which factors are needed to target patients for appropriate diagnosis and treatment.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

The effects of parathyroid hormone and alendronate alone or in combination in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Parathyroid hormone increases bone strength primarily by stimulating bone formation, whereas antiresorptive drugs reduce bone resorption. We conducted a randomized, double-blind clinical study of parathyroid hormone and alendronate to test the hypothesis that the concurrent administration of the two agents would increase bone density more than the use of either one alone. METHODS: A total of 238 postmenopausal women (who were not using bisphosphonates) with low bone mineral density at the hip or spine (a T score of less than -2.5, or a T score of less than -2.0 with an additional risk factor for osteoporosis) were randomly assigned to daily treatment with parathyroid hormone (1-84) (100 microg; 119 women), alendronate (10 mg; 60 women), or both (59 women) and were followed for 12 months. Bone mineral density at the spine and hip was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography. Markers of bone turnover were measured in fasting blood samples. RESULTS: The bone mineral density at the spine increased in all the treatment groups, and there was no significant difference in the increase between the parathyroid hormone group and the combination-therapy group. The volumetric density of the trabecular bone at the spine increased substantially in all groups, but the increase in the parathyroid hormone group was about twice that found in either of the other groups. Bone formation increased markedly in the parathyroid hormone group but not in the combination-therapy group. Bone resorption decreased in the combination-therapy group and the alendronate group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of synergy between parathyroid hormone and alendronate. Changes in the volumetric density of trabecular bone, the cortical volume at the hip, and levels of markers of bone turnover suggest that the concurrent use of alendronate may reduce the anabolic effects of parathyroid hormone. Longer-term studies of fractures are needed to determine whether and how antiresorptive drugs can be optimally used in conjunction with parathyroid hormone therapy.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2003

Combination therapy with hormone replacement and alendronate for prevention of bone loss in elderly women: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Therapy with individual antiresorptive agents has been shown to be effective for prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but whether combination antiresorptive therapy with hormones and bisphosphonates is safe or efficacious or how these agents compare in elderly women is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hormone replacement and the bisphosphonate alendronate sodium in combination are efficacious and safe, and how they compare with monotherapy in community-dwelling elderly women. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred seventy-three community-dwelling women age 65 years or older were screened: 485 completed screening and 373 (aged 65 to 90 years) were randomized following a 3-month, open-label, run-in phase with hormone replacement and alendronate placebo. The trial was conducted at a single academic US medical center from January 1996 to May 2001. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned in a 2 x 2 factorial design to receive hormone replacement (conjugated equine estrogen, 0.625 mg/d, with or without medroxyprogesterone, 2.5 mg/d) and alendronate, 10 mg daily, both agents, or neither. All participants received calcium and vitamin D supplements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annualized change in bone mineral density of the hip and spine and occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: Bone mineral density at 3 years was significantly greater at all femoral and vertebral sites in women treated with combination therapy than with monotherapy, with mean (SD) increases of 5.9% (3.8) at the total hip, 10.4% (5.4) at the posteroanterior lumbar spine, and 11.8% (6.8) at the lateral lumbar spine. Mean (SD) increases in bone mass at the hip in women treated with alendronate alone were significantly greater than in those treated with hormone replacement therapy alone (4.2% [3.8] vs 3.0% [4.9]; P<.05, respectively), and alendronate resulted in more responders to therapy. All therapies were well tolerated and participant retention was 90% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with hormone replacement and alendronate was efficacious and well tolerated in this cohort. Alendronate was superior to hormone replacement, and combination therapy was superior to either therapy alone. Combination therapy may represent an option for women with more severe disease or for those who have failed to achieve an adequate response to monotherapy.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Does bone mineral density and knowledge influence health-related behaviors of elderly men at risk for osteoporosis?

To determine if bone mineral density (BMD) substantially influences health-related behaviors in men at risk for osteoporosis, we surveyed 102 men who were participating in a study of prostate cancer and bone loss. Subjects included 68 men with prostate cancer, 44 of whom were hypogonadal on androgen deprivation therapy, and 34 healthy age-matched controls without prostate cancer. At least 6 mo after an initial evaluation, assessment of BMD, and osteoporosis information session, men were administered a questionnaire regarding their healthrelated behaviors. We found that men with osteopenia were 4 times as likely (13%) and men with osteoporosis were more than 10 times as likely (41%) to start taking bisphosphonates compared to men with a normal bone mass (3%, p < 0.0001). Men with low bone mass were more likely to begin taking calcium (p < 0.05) and vitamin D supplements (p < 0.05). Hypogonadal men were 10 times as likely to begin using bisphosphonates (34%) compared to the control group (3%, p < 0.0001) and twice as likely to begin using calcium supplements (57% vs 24%, p < 0.05). Caffeine consumption, alcohol consumption, dietary calcium intake, exercise, and smoking habits were not different in men with osteoporosis or those who were hypogonadal compared to controls. We conclude that men with low bone mass and hypogonadism were more likely to start using bisphosphonates, calcium supplements, and vitamin D supplements after having a bone density test. However, they were not more likely to make significant health-related lifestyle changes after obtaining the results of their bone mass.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Significant differential effects of alendronate, estrogen, or combination therapy on the rate of bone loss after discontinuation of treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with alendronate and estrogen for 2 years increases bone mineral density at the spine and hip more than does therapy with either agent alone. Changes in bone mineral density after discontinuation of therapy have not been compared directly. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of bone loss when therapy with alendronate, estrogen, or both agents is discontinued. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled discontinuation trial. SETTING: 18 U.S. centers. PATIENTS: 244 postmenopausal, hysterectomized women 44 to 77 years of age. INTERVENTION: 2 years of therapy with alendronate, 10 mg/d (n = 92); conjugated estrogen, 0.625 mg/d (n = 143); alendronate and conjugated estrogen (n = 140); or placebo (n = 50). At year 3, women were allocated into five groups: Twenty-eight women continued to take placebo and 44 women continued to take combination therapy, but 50 women taking alendronate, 81 taking conjugated estrogen, and 41 taking combination therapy were switched to placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover. RESULTS: Women taking alendronate or combination therapy who were switched to placebo for year 3 of the study maintained bone mass. Bone mineral density in these women was 4.1% (CI, 2.6% to 5.7%) and 6.6% (CI, 5.0% to 8.2%) higher, respectively, at the spine (P < 0.001 for both treatment comparisons) and 3.5% (CI, 2.3% to 4.6%) and 3.0% (CI, 1.8% to 4.2%) higher, respectively, at the trochanter (P < 0.001 for both treatment comparisons) than that in women previously taking estrogen who were switched to placebo. In contrast, women who were taking estrogen and were switched to placebo during year 3 experienced a 4.5% decrease at the spine (95% CI, -5.0% to -4.0%) and a 2.4% decrease at the trochanter (CI, -2.7% to -2.1%) (P < 0.001 for both changes). Compared with women who took placebo for 3 years, women who took estrogen for 2 years and were then switched to placebo had a bone mineral density that was 2.9% higher (CI, 1.2% to 4.6%) at the spine (P < 0.05) and 2.9% higher (CI, 1.6% to 4.2%) at the trochanter (P < 0.001). Changes in biochemical markers during year 3 did not differ among the groups that discontinued active treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated bone loss is seen after withdrawal of estrogen therapy but not after withdrawal of alendronate or combination therapy. The differential effects after withdrawal of therapy should be considered in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Alendronate improves bone mineral density in elderly women with osteoporosis residing in long-term care facilities. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Many elderly female residents of long-term care facilities have osteoporosis and could benefit from intervention to increase bone density. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of alendronate for treatment of osteoporosis in elderly female residents of long-term care facilities. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2-year study. SETTING: 25 long-term care facilities. PATIENTS: 327 elderly women with osteoporosis. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive alendronate, 10 mg/d, or placebo. All patients also received vitamin D, 400 IU/d, and some patients received supplemental calcium (total intake, approximately 1500 mg/d). MEASUREMENTS: Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip and biochemical markers of bone turnover. RESULTS: Alendronate produced significantly greater increases in BMD than did placebo (24-month differences: spine, 4.4% [95% CI, 3.3% to 5.5%]; femoral neck, 3.4% [CI, 2.3% to 4.4%]). Alendronate produced greater decreases from baseline in biochemical markers of bone turnover than did placebo (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Alendronate increased BMD at both the spine and hip in elderly female residents of long-term care facilities.

Aged↗